The Use Of ICT In Public Decision-Making Participation

This paper investigates social representations in processes of public decision-making participation where information and communication technologies (ICT) have played a role. The City Hall of Belo Horizonte, a Brazilian municipality, decided to use web-based technologies for the first time in 2006, creating a project called digital participative budget (DPB), whose purpose was to allow citizens to participate in prioritizing public works to be implemented in the next two years. The project was repeated in 2008 and 2011, but, intriguingly, citizen participation decreased. This study seeks to understand why popular participation has decreased over time despite the use of ICT to help connect citizens to the process. The theoretical approach is based on social representations theory (STR) and the methodology on critical discourse analysis (CDA) of 101 texts – 60 selected from the press and 41 signed by public organizations or governmental representatives. The results suggest that current political strategies, like those deployed in the Brazilian case, are not fully exploiting the potential for social interaction and collective construction offered by the Internet. The prevalence of processes of anchoring new practices in voting results mainly in its trivialization and reification, helping to outline reasons for the decrease in citizens’ participation.

[1]  BILL DOOLIN,et al.  Information technology as disciplinary technology: being critical in interpretive research on information systems , 1998, J. Inf. Technol..

[2]  B. Eden.  The Rise of the Network Society. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Vol. 1, 2nd ed. , 2001 .

[3]  Luc K. Audebrand,et al.  Avoiding Potential Traps in Fair Trade Marketing: A Social Representation Perspective , 2008 .

[4]  Ann Macintosh,et al.  E-participation and Governance: Widening the net , 2005 .

[5]  M. Thompson.  ICT, Power, and Developmental Discourse: A Critical Analysis , 2004, Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries..

[6]  Nicholas Berente,et al.  A social representations perspective on information systems implementation: Rethinking the concept of "frames" , 2008, Inf. Technol. People.

[7]  Bruce Bimber,et al.  The Internet and Political Transformation: Populism, Community, and Accelerated Pluralism , 1998, Polity.

[8]  C. Hardy,et al.  Online Consultation , 2005 .

[9]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  Danger is in the eye of the beholders: Social representations of Information Systems security in healthcare , 2007, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Marlei Pozzebon,et al.  The Implementation of Configurable Technology: Negotiations Between Global Principles and Local Contexts , 2004 .

[11]  L. Winner.  Myth Information: Romantic Politics in the Computer Revolution , 1986 .

[12]  M. Ruffin.  On being digital. , 1995, Physician executive.

[13]  Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama,et al.  Communication Richness in Electronic Mail: Critical Social Theory and the Contextuality of Meaning , 1997, MIS Q..

[14]  S. Moscovici.  Social Representations: Explorations in Social Psychology , 2000 .

[15]  Rob Kling,et al.  Hopes and Horrors: Technological Utopianism and Anti-Utopianism in Narratives of Computerization , 1995, Computerization and Controversy, 2nd Ed..

[16]  N. Fairclough.  A reply to Henry Widdowson's 'Discourse analysis: a critical view' , 1996 .

[17]  Åke Grönlund,et al.  eParticipation research: Systematizing the field , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[18]  S. Moscovici.  La psychanalyse, son image et son public , 2004 .

[19]  José Antonio Gomes de Pinho.  Sociedade da informação, capitalismo e sociedade civil: reflexões sobre política, internet e democracia na realidade Brasileira , 2011 .

[20]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area , 2008, Gov. Inf. Q..

[21]  Chrisanthi Avgerou,et al.  Information systems in developing countries: a critical research review , 2008, J. Inf. Technol..

[22]  Åke Grönlund,et al.  Introducing e-Gov: History, Definitions, and Issues , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  Responding to the (almost) unknown: Social representations and corporate policies of social media , 2010, ICIS.

[24]  Suzanne D. Pawlowski,et al.  Focusing the research agenda on burnout in IT: social representations of burnout in the profession , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Åke Grönlund,et al.  Democracy in an IT-framed society , 2001 .

[26]  M. Castells.  The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture , 1999 .

[27]  N. Fairclough,et al.  Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language , 1995 .

[28]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Representations and actions: the transformation of work practices with IT use , 2005, Inf. Organ..

[29]  Wendy L. Cukier,et al.  A critical analysis of media discourse on information technology: preliminary results of a proposed method for critical discourse analysis , 2009, Inf. Syst. J..