Evaluation and Analysis of Logistic Network Resilience With Application to Aircraft Servicing

To analyze the resilience of logistic networks, it is proposed to use a quantificational resilience evaluation approach. Firstly, the node resilience in a network is evaluated by its redundant resources, distributed suppliers and reachable deliveries. Then, an index of the total resilience of logistic network is calculated with the weighted sum of the node resilience. Based on the evaluation approach of resilience, the reasonable structure of the logistic networks is analyzed. A model is then studied to optimize the allocation of resources with connections, distribution centers or warehouses. Our approach has been used to study the resilience of logistic networks for aircraft maintenance and service and to guarantee the security and service quality of aeronautical systems. To monitor the operation of the logistic networks and enhance resilience, the architecture of a synthesized aircraft maintenance information management system and service logistic network is designed and being developed, which is called resilience information management system for aircraft service (RIMAS). The research results have been provided to the decision makers of the aviation management sector in the Chu Chiang Delta of China. Good comments have been achieved, which shows that the approach has potential for application in practice.

[1]  W. H. Ip,et al.  An aircraft service scheduling model using genetic algorithms , 2005 .

[2]  D. Newth,et al.  Optimizing complex networks for resilience against cascading failure , 2007 .

[3]  Stephan M. Wagner,et al.  An empirical investigation into supply chain vulnerability , 2006 .

[4]  Dingwei Wang,et al.  A heuristic genetic algorithm for subcontractor selection in a global manufacturing environment , 2001, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst..

[5]  Mitsuo Gen,et al.  Genetic algorithms and engineering design , 1997 .

[6]  Dingwei Wang,et al.  A branch and bound algorithm for sub-contractor selection in agile manufacturing environment , 2004 .

[7]  Anne Miller,et al.  Multi-level strategies to achieve resilience for an organisation operating at capacity: a case study at a trauma centre , 2007, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[8]  D. Delaitre,et al.  Contribution of Resilience to the Analysis of Flight Crew Decision-Making: Example of a Near-CFIT in Public Transport , 2007 .

[9]  Robert L. Wears,et al.  Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts , 2006, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[10]  Sanjay Goel,et al.  Structure-Based Resilience Metrics for Service-Oriented Networks , 2005, EDCC.

[11]  Thomas J. Kull,et al.  The risk of second-tier supplier failures in serial supply chains: Implications for order policies and distributor autonomy , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  W. H. Ip,et al.  Expert system for aircraft maintenance services industry , 2005 .

[13]  Jean Goubault-Larrecq,et al.  A Logical Framework for Evaluating Network Resilience Against Faults and Attacks , 2007, ASIAN.

[14]  Robert G. Prinz,et al.  Optimal multi-topology routing for IP resilience , 2006 .

[15]  Peter Brooker,et al.  AIRBORNE SEPARATION ASSURANCE SYSTEMS: TOWARDS A WORK PROGRAMME TO PROVE SAFETY , 2004 .

[16]  Chris Reed,et al.  Theoretical Steps Towards Modelling Resilience in Complex Systems , 2006, ICCSA.

[17]  Helmut Simonis,et al.  Constraint Based Resilience Analysis , 2006, CP.

[18]  P. Nunes,et al.  Analysis and evaluation of ecosystem resilience: an economic perspective with an application to the Venice lagoon , 2007, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[19]  Richard L. Church,et al.  A bilevel mixed-integer program for critical infrastructure protection planning , 2008, Comput. Oper. Res..

[20]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Resilience: An Evolutionary Approach to Spatial Economic Systems , 2001 .

[21]  Emily S. Patterson,et al.  Collaborative cross-checking to enhance resilience , 2005, Cognition, Technology & Work.