Failures of the reduction principle in an Ellsberg-type problem

Segal (1987) suggested that the Ellsberg paradox might be explained in terms of individuals mentally representing the decision problem as a two-stage lottery which they evaluated according to a non-expected utility model. This paper describes an experiment involving an explicitly two-stage analogue to an Ellsberg-type problem. This design substantially reduces the frequency of classic Ellsberg behaviour, but reveals other systematic violations of conventional theory. The paper discusses the particular patterns of choice and raises the more general problem of modelling individual decisions when the reduction principle does not hold.

[1]  R. Sugden,et al.  Some implications of a more general form of regret theory , 1987 .

[2]  R. Abrams,et al.  Psychological sources of ambiguity avoidance , 1986 .

[3]  Jean-Yves Jaffray,et al.  Individual behavior under risk and under uncertainty: An experimental study , 1985 .

[4]  J. Knetsch,et al.  Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded: Experimental Evidence of an Unexpected Disparity in Measures of Value , 1984 .

[5]  Colin F. Camerer,et al.  Recent developments in modelling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguitiy , 1991 .

[6]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Decision Making under Ambiguity , 1986 .

[7]  William D. Schulze,et al.  The Disparity Between Willingness to Accept and Willingness to Pay Measures of Value , 1987 .

[8]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  Risk, ambiguity, and insurance , 1989 .

[9]  A. Tversky,et al.  Rational choice and the framing of decisions , 1990 .

[10]  M. Machina Choice under Uncertainty: Problems Solved and Unsolved , 1987 .

[11]  K. MacCrimmon,et al.  Utility Theory: Axioms Versus ‘Paradoxes’ , 1979 .

[12]  J. Quiggin A theory of anticipated utility , 1982 .

[13]  A. Tversky,et al.  Who accepts Savage's axiom? , 1974 .

[14]  D. Ellsberg Decision, probability, and utility: Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms , 1961 .

[15]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[16]  J. Knetsch The Endowment Effect and Evidence of Nonreversible Indifference Curves. , 1989 .

[17]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[18]  S. Becker,et al.  What Price Ambiguity? or the Role of Ambiguity in Decision-Making , 1964, Journal of Political Economy.

[19]  F. Knight The economic nature of the firm: From Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit , 2009 .

[20]  A. Tversky,et al.  The Psychology of Preferences , 1982 .

[21]  R. Sugden,et al.  Regret Theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty Review of Economic Studies , 1982 .

[22]  R. Thaler Toward a positive theory of consumer choice , 1980 .

[23]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Ambiguity and Uncertainty in Probabilistic Inference. , 1985 .

[24]  C. S. Hong,et al.  Risk aversion in the theory of expected utility with rank dependent probabilities , 1987 .

[25]  Uzi Segal,et al.  The Ellsberg Paradox and Risk Aversion: An Anticipated Utility Approach , 1987 .

[26]  William Samuelson,et al.  Status quo bias in decision making , 1988 .

[27]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Venture Theory: A Model of Decision Weights , 1990 .

[28]  D. G. Rees,et al.  Foundations of Statistics , 1989 .

[29]  R. Sherman The Psychological Difference Between Ambiguity and Risk , 1974 .

[30]  David E. Bell,et al.  Regret in Decision Making under Uncertainty , 1982, Oper. Res..