Practical considerations for image-based PSF and blobs reconstruction in PET

Iterative reconstructions in positron emission tomography (PET) need a model relating the recorded data to the object/patient being imaged, called the system matrix (SM). The more realistic this model, the better the spatial resolution in the reconstructed images. However, a serious concern when using a SM that accurately models the resolution properties of the PET system is the undesirable edge artefact, visible through oscillations near sharp discontinuities in the reconstructed images. This artefact is a natural consequence of solving an ill-conditioned inverse problem, where the recorded data are band-limited. In this paper, we focus on practical aspects when considering image-based point-spread function (PSF) reconstructions. To remove the edge artefact, we propose to use a particular case of the method of sieves (Grenander 1981 Abstract Inference New York: Wiley), which simply consists in performing a standard PSF reconstruction, followed by a post-smoothing using the PSF as the convolution kernel. Using analytical simulations, we investigate the impact of different reconstruction and PSF modelling parameters on the edge artefact and its suppression, in the case of noise-free data and an exactly known PSF. Using Monte-Carlo simulations, we assess the proposed method of sieves with respect to the choice of the geometric projector and the PSF model used in the reconstruction. When the PSF model is accurately known, we show that the proposed method of sieves succeeds in completely suppressing the edge artefact, though after a number of iterations higher than typically used in practice. When applying the method to realistic data (i.e. unknown true SM and noisy data), we show that the choice of the geometric projector and the PSF model does not impact the results in terms of noise and contrast recovery, as long as the PSF has a width close to the true PSF one. Equivalent results were obtained using either blobs or voxels in the same conditions (i.e. the blob's density function being the same as the voxel-based PSF). From a practical point-of-view, the method can be used to perform fast reconstructions based on very simple models (compared to sinogram-based PSF modelling), producing artefact-free images with a better compromise between noise and spatial resolution than images reconstructed without or with under-estimated PSF. Besides, the method inherently limits the spatial resolution in the reconstructed images to the intrinsic one of the PET system.

[1]  E. Veklerov,et al.  MLE reconstruction of a brain phantom using a Monte Carlo transition matrix and a statistical stopping rule , 1988 .

[2]  S. Ross,et al.  Properties and Mitigation of Edge Artifacts in PSF-Based PET Reconstruction , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[3]  C. Comtat,et al.  Monte Carlo Simulation for the ECAT EXACT HR+ system using GATE , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[4]  Kris Thielemans,et al.  Trade-off between contrast recovery, image noise and edge artifacts in PET image reconstruction using detector blurring models , 2011, 2011 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[5]  Andrew J. Reader,et al.  Impact of Image-Space Resolution Modeling for Studies with the High-Resolution Research Tomograph , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  M Defrise,et al.  Non-Gaussian space-variant resolution modelling for list-mode reconstruction , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  S Stute,et al.  GATE V6: a major enhancement of the GATE simulation platform enabling modelling of CT and radiotherapy , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  R. Lewitt Alternatives to voxels for image representation in iterative reconstruction algorithms , 1992, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  A. Rahmim,et al.  Space-variant and anisotropic resolution modeling in list-mode EM reconstruction , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[10]  L. J. Thomas,et al.  Noise and Edge Artifacts in Maximum-Likelihood Reconstructions for Emission Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Johan Nuyts,et al.  Image properties of various ML-based reconstructions of very noisy HRRT data , 2011, 2011 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[12]  Peter D. Esser,et al.  The effect of edge artifacts on quantification of Positron Emission Tomography , 2010, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposuim & Medical Imaging Conference.

[13]  V. Bettinardi,et al.  Evaluation of a New Regularization Prior for 3-D PET Reconstruction Including PSF Modeling , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[14]  Jack Bresenham,et al.  Algorithm for computer control of a digital plotter , 1965, IBM Syst. J..

[15]  Yuchen Yan,et al.  A system for the 3D reconstruction of retracted-septa PET data using the EM algorithm , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium - NSS'94.

[16]  Vladimir Y. Panin,et al.  Fully 3-D PET reconstruction with system matrix derived from point source measurements , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Noise and signal properties in PSF-based fully 3D PET image reconstruction: an experimental evaluation , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  Arman Rahmim,et al.  Analytic system matrix resolution modeling in PET: An application to Rb-82 cardiac imaging , 2008, ISBI.

[19]  Andrew J. Reader,et al.  EM algorithm system modeling by image-space techniques for PET reconstruction , 2003 .

[20]  K Thielemans,et al.  Image-based point spread function implementation in a fully 3D OSEM reconstruction algorithm for PET , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Claude Comtat,et al.  Normalization of Monte Carlo PET data using GATE , 2011, 2011 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[22]  A. Martineau,et al.  A method for accurate modelling of the crystal response function at a crystal sub-level applied to PET reconstruction , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  L.M. Popescu,et al.  Ray tracing through a grid of blobs , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[24]  Gabor T. Herman,et al.  Image reconstruction from projections : the fundamentals of computerized tomography , 1980 .

[25]  C. Byrne Iterative algorithms for deblurring and deconvolution with constraints , 1998 .

[26]  Johan Nuyts,et al.  Maximum-likelihood reconstruction based on a modified Poisson distribution to reduce bias in PET , 2011, 2011 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[27]  R. Leahy,et al.  High-resolution 3D Bayesian image reconstruction using the microPET small-animal scanner. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  Klaus Wienhard,et al.  The ECAT HRRT: performance and first clinical application of the new high resolution research tomograph , 2000 .

[29]  M. Rafecas,et al.  Use of a Monte Carlo-based probability matrix for 3-D iterative reconstruction of MADPET-II data , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[30]  P. Joseph An Improved Algorithm for Reprojecting Rays through Pixel Images , 1982 .

[31]  K Thielemans,et al.  Impact of PSF modelling on the convergence rate and edge behaviour of EM images in PET , 2010, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposuim & Medical Imaging Conference.

[32]  Andrew J. Reader,et al.  One-pass list-mode EM algorithm for high-resolution 3-D PET image reconstruction into large arrays , 2002 .

[33]  Michael E Casey,et al.  PET performance measurements using the NEMA NU 2-2001 standard. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[34]  H. Malcolm Hudson,et al.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[35]  D. Snyder,et al.  Corrections for accidental coincidences and attenuation in maximum-likelihood image reconstruction for positron-emission tomography. , 1991, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[36]  R M Lewitt,et al.  Multidimensional digital image representations using generalized Kaiser-Bessel window functions. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[37]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[38]  Jinyi Qi,et al.  Iterative reconstruction techniques in emission computed tomography , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[39]  P. Joseph An Improved Algorithm for Reprojecting Rays through Pixel Images , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[40]  Samuel Matej,et al.  Efficient 3D grids for image reconstruction using spherically-symmetric volume elements , 1995 .

[41]  R. Siddon Fast calculation of the exact radiological path for a three-dimensional CT array. , 1985, Medical physics.

[42]  B. De Man,et al.  Distance-driven projection and backprojection in three dimensions. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[43]  Pablo Aguiar,et al.  Geometrical and Monte Carlo projectors in 3D PET reconstruction. , 2010, Medical physics.

[44]  Gengsheng L Zeng Gibbs Artifact Reduction by Nonnegativity Constraint , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

[45]  Jürgen Scheins,et al.  Analytical calculation of volumes-of-intersection for iterative, fully 3-D PET reconstruction , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.