Fractional Flow Reserve Derived From Computed Tomographic Angiography in Patients With Multivessel CAD.

[1]  Evidence based decision making between PCI and CABG , 2019, Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia.

[2]  D. Dey,et al.  Carotid plaque composition by CT angiography in asymptomatic subjects: a head-to-head comparison to ultrasound , 2019, European Radiology.

[3]  G. Stone,et al.  The year in cardiology 2018: coronary interventions , 2019, European heart journal.

[4]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Interpreting results of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve in clinical practice. , 2017, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[5]  P. Serruys,et al.  Clinical outcomes of state-of-the-art percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with de novo three vessel disease: 1-year results of the SYNTAX II study , 2017, European heart journal.

[6]  Jamil Mayet,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Computed Tomography–Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: A Systematic Review , 2017, JAMA cardiology.

[7]  C. Terkelsen,et al.  Clinical Use of Coronary CTA-Derived FFR for Decision-Making in Stable CAD. , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[8]  C. Roobottom,et al.  National Institute for Health and Care Excellence updates the stable chest pain guideline with radical changes to the diagnostic paradigm , 2017, Heart.

[9]  D. Newby,et al.  The Updated NICE Guidelines: Cardiac CT as the First-Line Test for Coronary Artery Disease , 2017, Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports.

[10]  P. Serruys,et al.  Non-invasive Heart Team assessment of multivessel coronary disease with coronary computed tomography angiography based on SYNTAX score II treatment recommendations: design and rationale of the randomised SYNTAX III Revolution trial. , 2017, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[11]  A. Jeremias,et al.  Use of the Instantaneous Wave‐free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  Thomas M Maddox,et al.  ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/STS 2017 Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization in Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  I. Kronzon,et al.  GIANT RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY ANEURYSM ASSOCIATED WITH A CORONARY CAMERAL FISTULA TO THE RIGHT ATRIUM , 2017 .

[14]  T. Maddox,et al.  ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/STS 2016 Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, Ameri , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  P. Serruys,et al.  Integration of non-invasive functional assessments with anatomical risk stratification in complex coronary artery disease: the non-invasive functional SYNTAX score. , 2017, Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy.

[16]  S. Pocock,et al.  Everolimus-Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  P. Serruys,et al.  Rationale and design of the SYNTAX II trial evaluating the short to long-term outcomes of state-of-the-art percutaneous coronary revascularisation in patients with de novo three-vessel disease. , 2016, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[18]  P. Stella,et al.  Deferral vs. performance of percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally non-significant coronary stenosis: 15-year follow-up of the DEFER trial. , 2015, European heart journal.

[19]  V. Fuster,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of coronary ct for the quantification of the syntax score in patients with left main and/or 3-vessel coronary disease. Comparison with invasive angiography. , 2015, International journal of cardiology.

[20]  P. Kolh,et al.  2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. , 2015, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[21]  M. Pencina,et al.  What to expect from net reclassification improvement with three categories , 2014, Statistics in medicine.

[22]  Hiroshi Ito,et al.  Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps). , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  M. Mack,et al.  Consideration of a new definition of clinically relevant myocardial infarction after coronary revascularization: an expert consensus document from the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI). , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  P. Serruys,et al.  CT-SYNTAX score: a feasibility and reproducibility Study. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[25]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Anatomical and clinical characteristics to guide decision making between coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for individual patients: development and validation of SYNTAX score II , 2013, The Lancet.

[26]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial , 2013, The Lancet.

[27]  Michael J Pencina,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography. , 2012, JAMA.

[28]  Nikola Jagic,et al.  Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  Helmut Baumgartner,et al.  ESC / EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization , 2014 .

[30]  G. Stone,et al.  SYNTAX Score Reproducibility and Variability Between Interventional Cardiologists, Core Laboratory Technicians, and Quantitative Coronary Measurements , 2011, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[31]  J. Lima,et al.  Coronary artery stenoses: accuracy of 64-detector row CT angiography in segments with mild, moderate, or severe calcification--a subanalysis of the CORE-64 trial. , 2011, Radiology.

[32]  B. De Bruyne,et al.  Functional SYNTAX score for risk assessment in multivessel coronary artery disease. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[33]  N. Wolfe.  Coronary artery stenoses:accuracy of 64-detector row CT angiography in segments with mild,moderate,or severe calcification——a subanalysis of the CORE-64 trial , 2011 .

[34]  N. Paul,et al.  Perioperative β-Blockers : Use With Caution Perioperative β Blockers in Patients Having Non-Cardiac Surgery : A Meta-Analysis , 2010 .

[35]  P. Serruys,et al.  The SYNTAX Score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. , 2005, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[36]  B. B. Roe.  The American Association for Thoracic Surgery , 1975 .