Assessment of functional parameters and comfort of a new computer mouse as compared with other types of input devices

Background. This study was conducted to assess functional parameters and comfort of a new computer mouse (Ergomice) as compared with three other input devices. Materials and methods. Functional parameters (i.e., task completion time and error rate) of each device were assessed by 10 participants using standardized software based on Standard No. ISO 9241-9:2000. Comfort evaluation was also undertaken for each device using the visual analogue scale technique. Statistical analysis including the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and the Friedman test was performed using SPSS version 16. Results. The functional parameters of the standard mouse were better than those of the other devices. However, no significant difference was observed between this mouse and Ergomice. Overall comfort evaluation showed that the standard mouse and Ergomice were more comfortable to work with. The comfort level of hand/wrist posture in the Ergomice was higher than that of the other three devices. Conclusion. The design features of Ergomice could improve its functional properties. Hand/wrist posture comfort of Ergomice was judged to be high compared with that of the other devices.

[1]  Jack T Dennerlein,et al.  Observed finger behaviour during computer mouse use. , 2008, Applied ergonomics.

[2]  Waldemar Karwowski,et al.  The occupational ergonomics handbook , 2006 .

[3]  Yung-Hui Lee,et al.  Design and validation of a desk-free and posture-independent input device. , 2008, Applied ergonomics.

[4]  M Fogleman,et al.  Computer mouse use and cumulative trauma disorders of the upper extremities. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[5]  N. Capener.  The hand in surgery. , 1956, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[6]  L Finsen,et al.  Job demands, muscle activity and musculoskeletal symptoms in relation to work with the computer mouse. , 1998, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[7]  L M Schleifer,et al.  Work Posture, Workstation Design, and Musculoskeletal Discomfort in a VDT Data Entry Task , 1991, Human factors.

[8]  Stuart K. Card,et al.  Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys, for text selection on a CRT , 1987 .

[9]  L. Straker.  Body Discomfort Assessment Tools , 2003 .

[10]  Allan Toomingas,et al.  Self-reported working conditions of VDU operators and associations with musculoskeletal symptoms : a cross-sectional study focussing on gender differences , 2002 .

[11]  Jacob O. Wobbrock,et al.  The effects of task dimensionality, endpoint deviation, throughput calculation, and experiment design on pointing measures and models , 2011, CHI.

[12]  Xuan Zhang,et al.  Evaluating Eye Tracking with ISO 9241 - Part 9 , 2007, HCI.

[13]  Thomas Läubli,et al.  Muscular load and performance compared between a pen and a computer mouse as input devices , 2010 .

[14]  Alireza Choobineh,et al.  Designing a new computer mouse and evaluating some of its functional parameters. , 2014, Journal of research in health sciences.

[15]  I. MacKenzie,et al.  A note on the information-theoretic basis of Fitts' law. , 1989, Journal of motor behavior.

[16]  MacKenzie Is.  A Note on the Information-Theoretic Basis for Fitts’ Law , 1989 .

[17]  Barbara S. Chaparro,et al.  Ergonomic Mice: Comparison of Performance and Perceived Exertion , 2008 .

[18]  Brian W. Epps.  Comparison of Six Cursor Control Devices Based on Fitts' Law Models , 1986 .

[19]  R G BJORNSON.  Developmental anomaly of the lateral malleolus simulating fracture. , 1956, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.