A novel noninvasive technology for treatment planning using virtual coronary stenting and computed tomography-derived computed fractional flow reserve.

OBJECTIVES This study sought to determine whether computational modeling can be used to predict the functional outcome of coronary stenting by virtual stenting of ischemia-causing stenoses identified on the pre-treatment model. BACKGROUND Computed tomography (CT)-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) is a novel noninvasive technology that can provide computed (FFRct) using standard coronary CT angiography protocols. METHODS We prospectively enrolled 44 patients (48 lesions) who had coronary CT angiography before angiography and stenting, and invasively measured FFR before and after stenting. FFRct was computed in blinded fashion using coronary CT angiography and computational fluid dynamics before and after virtual coronary stenting. Virtual stenting was performed by modification of the computational model to restore the area of the target lesion according to the proximal and distal reference areas. RESULTS Before intervention, invasive FFR was 0.70 ± 0.14 and noninvasive FFRct was 0.70 ± 0.15. FFR after stenting and FFRct after virtual stenting were 0.90 ± 0.05 and 0.88 ± 0.05, respectively (R = 0.55, p < 0.001). The mean difference between FFRct and FFR was 0.006 for pre-intervention (95% limit of agreement: -0.27 to 0.28) and 0.024 for post-intervention (95% limit of agreement: -0.08 to 0.13). Diagnostic accuracy of FFRct to predict ischemia (FFR ≤ 0.8) prior to stenting was 77% (sensitivity: 85.3%, specificity: 57.1%, positive predictive value: 83%, and negative predictive value: 62%) and after stenting was 96% (sensitivity: 100%, specificity: 96% positive predictive value: 50%, and negative predictive value: 100%). CONCLUSIONS Virtual coronary stenting of CT-derived computational models is feasible, and this novel noninvasive technology may be useful in predicting functional outcome after coronary stenting. (Virtual Coronary Intervention and Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve [FFR]; NCT01478100).

[1]  K. Gould,et al.  Pressure-derived fractional flow reserve to assess serial epicardial stenoses: theoretical basis and animal validation. , 2000, Circulation.

[2]  Michael J Pencina,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography. , 2012, JAMA.

[3]  G. Mintz,et al.  Comparison of usefulness of percutaneous coronary intervention guided by angiography plus computed tomography versus angiography alone using intravascular ultrasound end points. , 2011, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  R. Blankstein,et al.  Integration of coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion imaging , 2010, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[5]  Uwe Siebert,et al.  Economic Evaluation of Fractional Flow Reserve–Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel Disease , 2010, Circulation.

[6]  Nikola Jagic,et al.  Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  J. Koolen,et al.  Coronary Pressure Measurement to Assess the Hemodynamic Significance of Serial Stenoses Within One Coronary Artery: Validation in Humans , 2000, Circulation.

[8]  A. Schoenenberger,et al.  Effects of percutaneous coronary interventions in silent ischemia after myocardial infarction: the SWISSI II randomized controlled trial. , 2007, JAMA.

[9]  Charles A. Taylor,et al.  Patient-Specific Modeling of Blood Flow and Pressure in Human Coronary Arteries , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  Guido Germano,et al.  Optimal Medical Therapy With or Without Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Reduce Ischemic Burden: Results From the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) Trial Nuclear Substudy , 2008, Circulation.

[11]  B. J. Gersh.  Optimal Medical Therapy With or Without Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Reduce Ischemic Burden: Results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) Trial Nuclear Substudy , 2009 .

[12]  A. Dunning,et al.  Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  D. Berman,et al.  The present state of coronary computed tomography angiography a process in evolution. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  U. Siebert,et al.  Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  M. Reiser,et al.  Detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: incremental diagnostic value of dynamic CT-based myocardial perfusion imaging. , 2011, Radiology.