A new learning model of software engineering in vocational education

This research is how to development of learning models to be able to answer the challenges of this Industrial Revolution 4.0 era. The problem identified was the lack of learning outcomes, especially subjects oriented to software engineering for information systems students in particular and other computer science seen in the phenomenon of the inability of students to produce intelligent systems. From a series of validity, practicality, and effectiveness test results, using content validity with Aiken'V and construct validity with CFA (Confirmatory Factor Analysis) states that the model resulting from this study is stated, valid, practical and effective. This study also produced a new learning model with 5 syntaxes, namely (1) Define Problem and Design Project Plan, (2) Integrated of Support System, (3) Create a Project, (4) Keep control and Project Monitoring, (4) Yield and Assessment of Project. And based on the test of the validity of the syntax of this model stated goodness-of-fit or valid.  The results of the study were obtained from 3 learning aspects for affective elements; there are 7 aspects of the affective domain that have better grades than the control class, and from the psychomotor aspect both in the control class with an average value of 80.08 while in the experimental class the average psychomotor value is 85.78. From the cognitive aspect, students said that it was easier to get references and design an intelligent system.

[1]  Boris Otto,et al.  Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios , 2016, 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS).

[2]  Samy S. Abu Naser,et al.  Photoshop (CS6) intelligent tutoring system , 2017 .

[3]  G. Burlingame,et al.  Construct Validity of the Outcome Questionnaire: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis , 1998 .

[4]  E. Yildiz,et al.  Social media attitudes among vocational school students , 2019, International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE).

[5]  B. Bortnik,et al.  Interdisciplinary project-based learning: technology for improving student cognition , 2015 .

[6]  R. Shavelson,et al.  Challenges of a cross-national computer-based test adaptation , 2016, Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training.

[8]  Simon So,et al.  Mobile instant messaging support for teaching and learning in higher education , 2016, Internet High. Educ..

[9]  Introduction—Heutagogy: What Does It Mean and Why It Is Needed , 2020 .

[10]  J. Lu. Joyce,et al.  Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Education , 2018 .

[11]  Leon Andretti Abdillah,et al.  Enriching Information Technology Course Materials by Using Youtube , 2017, ArXiv.

[12]  Nurdin Arsyad,et al.  Developing a self-learning model based on open-ended questions to increase the students’ creativity in calculus , 2017 .

[13]  Samy S. Abu Naser,et al.  DES-Tutor: An Intelligent Tutoring System for Teaching DES Information Security Algorithm , 2017 .

[14]  A. Z. A. Razak Service delivery in Higher Education (HE): A comparative study between public and private universities , 2013 .

[15]  Gurbuz Caliskan,et al.  What is critical thinking? A longitudinal study with teacher candidates , 2019, International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE).

[16]  T. K. Nguyen,et al.  Influence of explicit higher-order thinking skills instruction on students’ learning of linguistics , 2017 .

[17]  Charles K. Fadel,et al.  21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times , 2009 .