Effect of Modified Japanese Orthopedic Association Severity Classifications on Satisfaction With Outcomes 12 Months After Elective Surgery for Cervical Spine Myelopathy

Study Design. This study retrospectively analyzes prospectively collected data. Objective. Here, we aim to determine the influence of preoperative and 12-month modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) on satisfaction and understand the change in mJOA severity classification after surgical management of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). Summary of Background Data. DCM is a progressive degenerative spine disease resulting from cervical cord compression. The natural progression of DCM is variable; some patients experience periods of stability, while others rapidly deteriorate following disease onset. The mJOA is commonly used to grade and categorize myelopathy symptoms, but its association with postoperative satisfaction has not been previously explored. Methods. The quality and outcomes database (QOD) was queried for patients undergoing elective surgery for DCM. Patients were divided into mild (≥14), moderate (9 to 13), or severe (<9) categories on the mJOA scores. A McNemar–Bowker test was used to assess whether a significant proportion of patients changed mJOA category between preoperative and 12 months postoperative. A multivariable proportional odds ordinal logistic regression model was fitted with 12-month satisfaction as the outcome of interest. Results. We identified 1963 patients who underwent elective surgery for DCM and completed 12-months follow-ups. Comparing mJOA severity level preoperatively and at 12 months revealed that 55% remained in the same category, 37% improved, and 7% moved to a worse category. After adjusting for baseline and surgery-specific variables, the 12-month mJOA category had the highest impact on patient satisfaction (P < 0.001). Conclusion. Patient satisfaction is an indispensable tool for measuring quality of care after spine surgery. In this sample, 12-month mJOA category, regardless of preop mJOA, was significantly correlated with satisfaction. Given these findings, it is important to advise patients of the probability that surgery will change their mJOA severity classification and the changes required to achieve postoperative satisfaction. Level of Evidence: 3

[1]  T. Albert,et al.  Are patient-reported outcomes predictive of patient satisfaction 5 years after anterior cervical spine surgery? , 2017, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[2]  M. Fehlings,et al.  Surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy: a patient-centered quality of life and health economic evaluation. , 2016, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[3]  F. Harrell,et al.  Impact of Functional Status of Patient on Satisfaction with Surgery 12 Months after Elective Spine Surgery for Lumbar Degenerative Disease , 2016 .

[4]  M. McGirt,et al.  Impact of old age on patient-report outcomes and cost utility for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery for degenerative spine disease , 2016, European Spine Journal.

[5]  M. Fehlings,et al.  A Clinical Prediction Rule for Functional Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Analysis of an International Prospective Multicenter Data Set of 757 Subjects. , 2015, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  M. Fehlings,et al.  Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Spectrum of Related Disorders Affecting the Aging Spine. , 2015, Neurosurgery.

[7]  Zhongjun Liu,et al.  Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in neurological function and quality of life after surgery in cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients: a prospective cohort study , 2015, European Spine Journal.

[8]  C. Bolger,et al.  A Global Perspective on the Outcomes of Surgical Decompression in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Results From the Prospective Multicenter AOSpine International Study on 479 Patients , 2015, Spine.

[9]  M. McGirt,et al.  Patient-Specific Factors Associated With Dissatisfaction After Elective Surgery for Degenerative Spine Diseases. , 2015, Neurosurgery.

[10]  Kevin R. O'Neill,et al.  What Patient Characteristics Could Potentially Affect Patient Satisfaction Scores During Spine Clinic? , 2015, Spine.

[11]  M. Fehlings,et al.  Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Epidemiology, Genetics, and Pathogenesis , 2015, Spine.

[12]  M. Fehlings,et al.  Psychometric Properties of the Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scale in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy , 2015, Spine.

[13]  M. Fehlings,et al.  Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Spectrum of Related Disorders Affecting the Aging Spine. , 2015, Neurosurgery.

[14]  Sakae Tanaka,et al.  Patient satisfaction with double-door laminoplasty for cervical compression myelopathy , 2015, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[15]  M. McGirt,et al.  Clinical registries and evidence-based care pathways: raising the bar for meaningful measurement and delivery of value-based care. , 2014, Spine.

[16]  H. Inoue,et al.  Preoperative Predictors of Patient Satisfaction with Outcome after Cervical Laminoplasty , 2014, Global spine journal.

[17]  R. Slatcher,et al.  Marital quality and health: a meta-analytic review. , 2014, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  M. Fehlings,et al.  Predictors of outcome in patients with degenerative cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing surgical treatment: results of a systematic review , 2015, European Spine Journal.

[19]  Brian F. White,et al.  Patient Satisfaction Surveys: Tools to Enhance Patient Care or Flawed Outcome Measures? , 2013, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[20]  M. Fehlings,et al.  Pathophysiology and Natural History of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy , 2013, Spine.

[21]  M. Fehlings,et al.  Efficacy and safety of surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: results of the AOSpine North America prospective multi-center study. , 2013, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[22]  M. McGirt,et al.  Determining the quality and effectiveness of surgical spine care: patient satisfaction is not a valid proxy. , 2013, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[23]  S. Bederman Commentary: Patient satisfaction in spinal surgery: should we be addressing customer service or health improvement? , 2013, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[24]  D. Mikulis,et al.  Predictors of Surgical Outcome in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy , 2013, Spine.

[25]  E. Zusman,et al.  HCAHPS replaces Press Ganey survey as quality measure for patient hospital experience. , 2012, Neurosurgery.

[26]  Anthony F Jerant,et al.  The cost of satisfaction: a national study of patient satisfaction, health care utilization, expenditures, and mortality. , 2012, Archives of internal medicine.

[27]  Peter Diel,et al.  SWISSspine-a nationwide health technology assessment registry for balloon kyphoplasty: methodology and first results. , 2010, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[28]  Semih Utku,et al.  Spine surgery database: a Turkish registry for spinal disorders. , 2010, Turkish neurosurgery.

[29]  Timothy C Ryken,et al.  Clinical prognostic indicators of surgical outcome in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. , 2009, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[30]  P. Harris,et al.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap) - A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support , 2009, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[31]  L. Riley,et al.  Patient satisfaction in the cervical spine research society outcomes study: relationship to improved clinical outcome. , 2009, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[32]  H. Brisby,et al.  Patients' Satisfaction With Provided Care/Information and Expectations on Clinical Outcome After Lumbar Disc Herniation Surgery , 2007, Spine.

[33]  J. Zivin,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness of Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Cervical Spondylosis , 2005, Spine.

[34]  NQF endorses HCAHPS patient perception survey. , 2005, Healthcare benchmarks and quality improvement.

[35]  M. Aebi,et al.  SSE Spine Tango: a European Spine Registry promoted by the Spine Society of Europe (SSE) , 2004, European Spine Journal.

[36]  Edwin D Boudreaux,et al.  Patient satisfaction data as a quality indicator: a tale of two emergency departments. , 2003, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[37]  P. Cooper,et al.  Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: patterns of neurological deficit and recovery after anterior cervical decompression. , 1999, Neurosurgery.

[38]  M. Liang,et al.  The North American Spine Society Lumbar Spine Outcome Assessment Instrument: Reliability and Validity Tests , 1996, Spine.

[39]  E. Benzel,et al.  Cervical laminectomy and dentate ligament section for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. , 1991, Journal of spinal disorders.