Identification of the hydraulic conductivity using a global optimization method

A method to determine the soil hydraulic conductivity via an internal drainage experiment is presented. Identifying the parameters of the hydraulic conductivity is achieved by solving an inverse global optimization problem that uses the water contents measured at different depths and times as matching flow variables. The optimization procedure is combined with a recently developed analytical model for the water content propagation, which essentially assumes that the flow is gravity-driven. A crucial (from the identification point of view) parameter of such a model is the initial position zW of the draining front, determining the interface between the wetted and dried zone. By using an evolutionary algorithm specifically developed for this problem, it is shown that if information upon zW is not a priori available, the identification of the hydraulic conductivity is not possible. However, assuming that zW is known (i.e. measured), and by dividing the model variables by zW, the optimization is able to fully identify the soil hydraulic conductivity. Finally, in order to show the robustness of the proposed approach, it is shown that the method leads to very good estimates of the hydraulic conductivity even if data are noise-affected, provided that the optimization procedure is coupled to the (Tikhonov) regularization approach.

[1]  W. R. Gardner.  SOME STEADY‐STATE SOLUTIONS OF THE UNSATURATED MOISTURE FLOW EQUATION WITH APPLICATION TO EVAPORATION FROM A WATER TABLE , 1958 .

[2]  G. Severino,et al.  Analytical Model for Gravity-Driven Drainage , 2005 .

[3]  David B. Fogel,et al.  Evolutionary Computation: The Fossil Record , 1998 .

[4]  Carlos Gamio,et al.  Reconstruction of capacitance tomography images of simulated two-phase flow regimes , 2003 .

[5]  Nunzio Romano,et al.  Determining soil hydraulic functions from evaporation experiments by a parameter estimation Approach: Experimental verifications and numerical studies , 1999 .

[6]  P. Raats.  Implications of some analytical solutions for drainage of soil water , 1983 .

[7]  A. Santini,et al.  Methodological approach for evaluating the response of soil hydrological behavior to irrigation with treated municipal wastewater , 2004 .

[8]  Van Genuchten,et al.  A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils , 1980 .

[9]  Keith A. Smith,et al.  Soil analysis: physical methods. , 1991 .

[10]  D. A. Woolhiser,et al.  Infiltration Theory for Hydrologic Applications , 2002 .

[11]  Y. Mualem.  A New Model for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity , 1976 .

[12]  M. Th. van Genuchten,et al.  Parameter estimation for unsaturated flow and transport models — A review , 1987 .

[13]  Christiaan Dirksen,et al.  Unsaturated hydraulic conductivity , 1990 .

[14]  J. W. Biggar,et al.  Simple field methods for estimating soil hydraulic conductivity. , 1980 .

[15]  Gerardo Severino,et al.  Determining the soil hydraulic conductivity by means of a field scale internal drainage , 2003 .

[16]  D. Oyedele,et al.  Spatial and temporal variability of soil water content , 2010 .

[17]  D. Hillel.  Environmental soil physics , 1998 .

[18]  S. Gómez,et al.  The triangle method for finding the corner of the L-curve , 2002 .