Improving deformation models by discounting transient signals in geodetic data: 1. Concept and synthetic examples

GPS geodesy provides very precise velocities of benchmarks on decadal timescales, and geodesists often describe their uncertainties with a velocity covariance matrix. However, those who model neotectonic deformation to estimate long‐term seismic hazard want constraints on the interseismic velocities of stable bedrock on multithousand‐year timescales. When the former (available data) are used as proxies for the latter (desired constraints), it is necessary to increase uncertainties to characterize a variety of transient and/or surficial noise processes, including magma chamber recharge, postseismic relaxation, pore fluid motion, extremely slow landsliding, and glacial isostatic adjustment. The effects of transient noise on distant reference benchmarks also add to uncertainty of the long‐term velocity reference frame. We augment the reported velocity covariance matrix with transpose products of velocity perturbation vectors from simple models approximately describing anticipated transient and surficial noise sources. No artifacts are introduced by this method because the velocity‐vector data are unchanged. When the inverse of the augmented covariance matrix (the “diminished normal matrix”) is used in the objective function of a neotectonic deformation model partially driven by GPS data, the perturbing effects of transient and surficial signals are greatly reduced. Improvement occurs even when the prior estimates of noise processes are rather crude. We present two examples computed with synthetic data.

[1]  K. Mogi Relations between the Eruptions of Various Volcanoes and the Deformations of the Ground Surfaces around them , 1958 .

[2]  D. E. Smylie,et al.  Effect of earthquakes on the Chandler wobble and the secular polar shift , 1967 .

[3]  D. E. Smylie,et al.  The displacement fields of inclined faults , 1971, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[4]  J. C. Savage,et al.  Geodetic determination of relative plate motion in central California , 1973 .

[5]  Charles A. Williams,et al.  A rheologically layered three‐dimensional model of the San Andreas Fault in central and southern California , 1991 .

[6]  Yehuda Bock,et al.  Postseismic deformation following the Landers earthquake, California, 28 June 1992 , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[7]  Y. Bock,et al.  Postseismic deformation following the Landers earthquake, California, 28 June 1992 , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[8]  William Rodi,et al.  Global Positioning System constraints on fault slip rates in southern California and northern Baja, Mexico , 1996 .

[9]  Kenneth W. Hudnut,et al.  Poroelastic rebound along the Landers 1992 earthquake surface rupture , 1998 .

[10]  奥村 晃史 Characteristic Earthquake Modelをめぐる地質データとその解釈 , 1999 .

[11]  X. Pichon,et al.  Full interseismic locking of the Nankai and Japan‐west Kurile subduction zones: An analysis of uniform elastic strain accumulation in Japan constrained by permanent GPS , 2000 .

[12]  P. Segall,et al.  Postseismic deformation following the 1906 San Francisco earthquake , 2000 .

[13]  Yann Kerr,et al.  International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) , 2004 .

[14]  Zhen Liu,et al.  Seismic Hazard Inferred from Tectonics: California , 2005 .

[15]  R. Bürgmann,et al.  Influence of lithosphere viscosity structure on estimates of fault slip rate in the Mojave region of the San Andreas fault system , 2007 .

[16]  Charles S. Mueller,et al.  Documentation for the 2008 update of the United States National Seismic Hazard Maps , 2008 .

[17]  W. Rucker Neotectonic Kinematic Analysis of Philippines Orogen: Regional Strain-Rates and a Forecast of Long-term Seismicity , 2008 .

[18]  R. Bennett Instantaneous deformation from continuous GPS: Contributions from quasi-periodic loads , 2008 .

[19]  John Langbein,et al.  Noise in GPS displacement measurements from Southern California and Southern Nevada , 2008 .

[20]  F. Pollitz,et al.  Temporal evolution of continental lithospheric strength in actively deforming regions , 2008 .

[21]  Zhen Liu,et al.  Kinematic modelling of neotectonics in the Persia-Tibet-Burma orogen , 2008 .

[22]  Peter Bird,et al.  Long-term fault slip rates, distributed deformation rates, and forecast of seismicity in the western United States from joint fitting of community geologic, geodetic, and stress direction data sets , 2009 .

[23]  K. Johnson,et al.  Insights into active tectonics of eastern Taiwan from analyses of geodetic and geologic data , 2010 .

[24]  Ling Lei,et al.  Monitoring slow moving landslides in the Berkeley Hills with TerraSAR-X data , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[25]  K. Johnson,et al.  New methods for estimating the spatial distribution of locked asperities and stress‐driven interseismic creep on faults with application to the San Francisco Bay Area, California , 2010 .

[26]  Peter Steigenberger,et al.  Improved Constraints on Models of Glacial Isostatic Adjustment: A Review of the Contribution of Ground-Based Geodetic Observations , 2010 .

[27]  P. Bird,et al.  Exploratory models of long‐term crustal flow and resulting seismicity across the Alpine‐Aegean orogen , 2010 .

[28]  G. Blewitt,et al.  Block modeling of crustal deformation of the northern Walker Lane and Basin and Range from GPS velocities , 2011 .

[29]  Kaj M. Johnson,et al.  Reconciling geologic and geodetic model fault slip-rate discrepancies in Southern California: Consideration of nonsteady mantle flow and lower crustal fault creep , 2011 .

[30]  Characteristic earthquake model, 1884 -- 2011, R.I.P , 2012, 1207.4836.

[31]  A. Montanari,et al.  Syn‐convergent extension observed using the RETREAT GPS network, northern Apennines, Italy , 2012 .

[32]  Fred F. Pollitz,et al.  How do “ghost transients” from past earthquakes affect GPS slip rate estimates on southern California faults? , 2013 .

[33]  Timothy E. Dawson,et al.  Uniform California earthquake rupture forecast, version 3 (UCERF3): the time-independent model , 2013 .

[34]  D. Sandwell,et al.  Is there a discrepancy between geological and geodetic slip rates along the San Andreas Fault System , 2013 .

[35]  A. R. Pisani,et al.  Strain rate relaxation of normal and thrust faults in Italy , 2013 .

[36]  Kaj M. Johnson,et al.  Slip rates and off‐fault deformation in Southern California inferred from GPS data and models , 2013 .

[37]  Urs Hugentobler,et al.  Velocity covariance in the presence of anisotropic time correlated noise and transient events in GPS time series , 2013 .

[38]  Chris Zweck,et al.  Active Deformation Processes in Alaska, Based on 15 Years of GPS Measurements , 2013 .

[39]  W. Hammond,et al.  Appendix C—Deformation Models for UCERF3 , 2013 .

[40]  T. Dixon,et al.  Earthquake and tsunami forecasts: Relation of slow slip events to subsequent earthquake rupture , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  G. Blewitt,et al.  Uplift and seismicity driven by groundwater depletion in central California , 2014, Nature.

[42]  U. Hugentobler,et al.  Reducing the draconitic errors in GNSS geodetic products , 2014, Journal of Geodesy.

[43]  Morgan P. Moschetti,et al.  Geodesy- and Geology-Based Slip-Rate Models for the Western United States (Excluding California) National Seismic Hazard Maps , 2014 .

[44]  B. E. Shaw,et al.  Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, Version 3 (UCERF3)—The Time‐Independent Model , 2014 .

[45]  E. Rivalta,et al.  On precisely modelling surface deformation due to interacting magma chambers and dykes , 2014 .

[46]  Felix W. Landerer,et al.  Seasonal variation in total water storage in California inferred from GPS observations of vertical land motion , 2014 .

[47]  T. Dixon,et al.  Space geodetic observation of the deformation cycle across the Ballenas Transform, Gulf of California , 2015 .

[48]  C. Kreemer,et al.  GEAR1: A Global Earthquake Activity Rate Model Constructed from Geodetic Strain Rates and Smoothed Seismicity , 2015 .

[49]  A. Hampel,et al.  Horizontal surface velocity and strain patterns near thrust and normal faults during the earthquake cycle: The importance of viscoelastic relaxation in the lower crust and implications for interpreting geodetic data , 2015 .

[50]  Jean-Philippe Montillet,et al.  Estimation of offsets in GPS time-series and application to the detection of earthquake deformation in the far-field , 2015 .

[51]  Timothy H. Dixon,et al.  GPS-based monitoring of surface deformation associated with CO 2 injection at an enhanced oil recovery site , 2015 .

[52]  C. Kreemer,et al.  Erratum to Revised Tectonic Forecast of Global Shallow Seismicity Based on Version 2.1 of the Global Strain Rate Map , 2015 .

[53]  C. Kreemer,et al.  Revised Tectonic Forecast of Global Shallow Seismicity Based on Version 2.1 of the Global Strain Rate MapRevised Tectonic Forecast of Global Shallow Seismicity Based on Version 2.1 of the Global Strain Rate Map , 2015 .

[54]  T. Dixon,et al.  Multiscale postseismic behavior on a megathrust: The 2012 Nicoya earthquake, Costa Rica , 2015 .

[55]  P. Bird,et al.  Improving deformation models by discounting transient signals in geodetic data: 2. Geodetic data, stress directions, and long‐term strain rates in Italy , 2016 .