Cognitive Representation of Negative Numbers

To understand negative numbers, must we refer to positive number representations (the phylogenetic hypothesis), or do we acquire a negative mental number line (the ontogenetic hypothesis)? In the experiment reported here, participants made lateralized button responses to indicate the larger of two digits from the range -9 to 9. Digit pairs were displayed spatially congruent or incongruent with either a phylogenetic or an ontogenetic mental number line. The pattern of decision latencies suggests that negative numbers become associated with left space, thus supporting the ontogenetic view.

[1]  T. Hines,et al.  An odd effect: Lengthened reaction times for judgments about odd digits , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[2]  S. Dehaene.  Subtracting Pigeons: Logarithmic or Linear? , 2001, Psychological science.

[3]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. , 1998 .

[4]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Précis of The Number Sense , 2001 .

[5]  D. Berch,et al.  Extracting parity and magnitude from Arabic numerals: developmental changes in number processing and mental representation. , 1999, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[6]  F. Restle.  Speed of Adding and Comparing Numbers. , 1970 .

[7]  M. H. Fischer,et al.  Number processing induces spatial performance biases , 2001, Neurology.

[8]  J. L. Myers,et al.  Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  C R Gallistel,et al.  Numerical Subtraction in the Pigeon: Evidence for a Linear Subjective Number Scale , 2001, Psychological science.

[10]  Paul B. Buckley,et al.  Comparisons of digits and dot patterns. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  Matthew F. S. Rushworth,et al.  The Mental Number Line and the Human Angular Gyrus , 2001, NeuroImage.

[12]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Non-verbal numerical cognition: from reals to integers , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  G. Orban,et al.  Parietal Representation of Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Magnitude , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  Peter Brugger,et al.  Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  The new cognitive neurosciences , 2000 .

[16]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[17]  W. Fias.  The Importance of Magnitude Information in Numerical Processing: Evidence from the SNARC Effect , 1996 .

[18]  E. Spelke,et al.  Sources of mathematical thinking: behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. , 1999, Science.