Visual Equivalence and Amodal Completion in Cuttlefish

Modern cephalopods are notably the most intelligent invertebrates and this is accompanied by keen vision. Despite extensive studies investigating the visual systems of cephalopods, little is known about their visual perception and object recognition. In the present study, we investigated the visual processing of the cuttlefish Sepia pharaonis, including visual equivalence and amodal completion. Cuttlefish were trained to discriminate images of shrimp and fish using the operant conditioning paradigm. After cuttlefish reached the learning criteria, a series of discrimination tasks were conducted. In the visual equivalence experiment, several transformed versions of the training images, such as images reduced in size, images reduced in contrast, sketches of the images, the contours of the images, and silhouettes of the images, were used. In the amodal completion experiment, partially occluded views of the original images were used. The results showed that cuttlefish were able to treat the training images of reduced size and sketches as the visual equivalence. Cuttlefish were also capable of recognizing partially occluded versions of the training image. Furthermore, individual differences in performance suggest that some cuttlefish may be able to recognize objects when visual information was partly removed. These findings support the hypothesis that the visual perception of cuttlefish involves both visual equivalence and amodal completion. The results from this research also provide insights into the visual processing mechanisms used by cephalopods.

[1]  S. Kanazawa,et al.  Perception of Object Unity in a Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) , 1997 .

[2]  Clive D. L. Wynne,et al.  Animal cognition : evolution, behavior and cognition , 2013 .

[3]  D. Wilson,et al.  Video playback demonstrates episodic personality in the gloomy octopus , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[4]  J. Messenger Learning in the cuttlefish, Sepia , 1973 .

[5]  Martin Giurfa,et al.  Local-feature assembling in visual pattern recognition and generalization in honeybees , 2004, Nature.

[6]  Long Quan,et al.  Image deblurring with blurred/noisy image pairs , 2007, SIGGRAPH 2007.

[7]  Una F. Jacobs-Jessen Zur Orientierung der Hummeln und einiger anderer Hymenopteren , 1959, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie.

[8]  A. Darmaillacq,et al.  Visual interpolation for contour completion by the European cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) and its use in dynamic camouflage , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  G. Kanizsa,et al.  Organization in Vision: Essays on Gestalt Perception , 1979 .

[10]  A. Darmaillacq,et al.  Do reef fish, Variola louti and Scarus niger, perform amodal completion? Evidence from a field study. , 2011, Journal of comparative psychology.

[11]  H. Lachnit,et al.  The effect of cumulative experience on the use of elemental and configural visual discrimination strategies in honeybees , 2003, Behavioural Brain Research.

[12]  J. Fagot,et al.  Perception of Partly Occluded Figures by Baboons (Papio Papio) , 2000, Perception.

[13]  D. Dougherty,et al.  Stimulus generalization, discrimination learning, and peak shift in horses. , 1991, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[14]  D. Newth THE ANATOMY OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM OF OCTOPUS VULGARIS , 1972 .

[15]  R. Douglas,et al.  Size constancy in goldfish (Carassius auratus) , 1988, Behavioural Brain Research.

[16]  G. Butterworth,et al.  Michotte's experimental phenomenology of perception , 1994 .

[17]  Martin Stevens,et al.  Visual Ecology , 2015 .

[18]  W. Muntz Interocular transfer in Octopus vulgaris. , 1961, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[19]  N. Guttman,et al.  Discriminability and stimulus generalization. , 1956, Journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  A. Packard,et al.  CEPHALOPODS AND FISH: THE LIMITS OF CONVERGENCE , 1972 .

[21]  V. Bruce,et al.  Visual perception: Physiology, psychology and ecology, 2nd ed. , 1990 .

[22]  Bruce Walter,et al.  Visual equivalence: towards a new standard for image fidelity , 2007, ACM Trans. Graph..

[23]  M. Lehrer,et al.  Generalization of convex shapes by bees: what are shapes made of? , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[24]  J. Messenger,et al.  The visual attack of the cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis. , 1968, Animal behaviour.

[25]  J. H. van Hateren,et al.  Pattern recognition in bees: orientation discrimination , 1990, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[26]  G. Kanizsa,et al.  Amodal Completion in Mouse Vision , 1993, Perception.

[27]  W. O. Jenkins,et al.  Deprivation and generalization. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.

[28]  N. Tinbergen,et al.  Die Balz des Samtfalters, Eumenis (=Satyrus) semele (L.) , 1942 .

[29]  Bernhard Ronacher,et al.  How do bees learn and recognize visual patterns? , 1998, Biological Cybernetics.

[30]  J. Tautz,et al.  Number-Based Visual Generalisation in the Honeybee , 2009, PloS one.

[31]  B. Hochner Functional and comparative assessments of the octopus learning and memory system. , 2010, Frontiers in bioscience.

[32]  Martin Giurfa,et al.  The influence of training length on generalization of visual feature assemblies in honeybees , 2005, Behavioural Brain Research.

[33]  W. Muntz An Experiment on Shape Discrimination and Signal Detection in Octopus , 1970 .

[34]  A. Darmaillacq,et al.  Cephalopod Cognition: Acknowledgements , 2014 .

[35]  John Young The anatomy of the nervous system of Octopus vulgaris , 1971 .

[36]  L. Dickel,et al.  Orientation in the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis: response versus place learning , 2006, Animal Cognition.

[37]  Peter Thompson,et al.  Basic Vision: An Introduction to Visual Perception , 2006 .

[38]  A. Shohet,et al.  Perception of edges and visual texture in the camouflage of the common cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  N. Pastore Form Perception and Size Constancy in the Duckling , 1958 .

[40]  John Zachary Young,et al.  The Brains and Lives of Cephalopods , 2003 .

[41]  S. Ghirlanda,et al.  A century of generalization , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[42]  H. Barlow Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information: David Marr. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1982. pp. xvi + 397 , 1983 .

[43]  D. Osorio,et al.  Cephalopod Cognition: Cuttlefish camouflage: vision and cognition , 2014 .

[44]  Roman Fuchs,et al.  Tits use amodal completion in predator recognition: a field experiment , 2010, Animal Cognition.

[45]  Johanna B. Holm,et al.  Octopuses (Octopus bimaculoides) and cuttlefishes (Sepia pharaonis, S. officinalis) can conditionally discriminate , 2007, Animal Cognition.

[46]  S. Shettleworth Cognition, evolution, and behavior, 2nd ed. , 2010 .

[47]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Recognition of partly occluded objects by fish , 2007, Animal Cognition.

[48]  David C. O'Carroll,et al.  Insect perception of illusory contours , 1992 .

[49]  A. Horridge Generalization in visual recognition by the honeybee (Apis mellifera): a review and explanation. , 2009, Journal of insect physiology.

[50]  Celia M. Lombardi,et al.  Size Invariance in Visual Pattern Recognition by Pigeons , 2019, Quantitative Analyses of Behavior.