The ERP response to the amount of information conveyed by words in sentences

[1]  Antal van den Bosch,et al.  Prediction During Natural Language Comprehension. , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  Tal Linzen,et al.  Investigating the role of entropy in sentence processing , 2014, CMCL@ACL.

[3]  A. D. de Groot,et al.  The meaning of “significance” for different types of research [translated and annotated by Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Denny Borsboom, Josine Verhagen, Rogier Kievit, Marjan Bakker, Angelique Cramer, Dora Matzke, Don Mellenbergh, and Han L. J. van der Maas] , 2014 .

[4]  Stefan Frank,et al.  Modelling Reading Times in Bilingual Sentence Comprehension , 2014, CogSci.

[5]  R. Kievit,et al.  The meaning of “ signi fi cance ” for different types of research [ translated and annotated , 2014 .

[6]  R. Kievit,et al.  The meaning of "significance" for different types of research [translated and annotated by Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Denny Borsboom, Josine Verhagen, Rogier Kievit, Marjan Bakker, Angelique Cramer, Dora Matzke, Don Mellenbergh, and Han L. J. van der Maas]. 1969. , 2014, Acta psychologica.

[7]  Clara D. Martin,et al.  Bilinguals reading in their second language do not predict upcoming words as native readers do , 2013 .

[8]  Nathaniel J. Smith,et al.  The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic , 2013, Cognition.

[9]  Stefan L. Frank,et al.  Uncertainty Reduction as a Measure of Cognitive Load in Sentence Comprehension , 2013, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[10]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Two Sides of Meaning: The Scalp-Recorded N400 Reflects Distinct Contributions from the Cerebral Hemispheres , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[11]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[12]  Robin L Thompson,et al.  Reading time data for evaluating broad-coverage models of English sentence processing , 2013, Behavior research methods.

[13]  Gabriella Vigliocco,et al.  Word surprisal predicts N400 amplitude during reading , 2013, ACL.

[14]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  How hierarchical is language use? , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  Roger Levy,et al.  Sequential vs. Hierarchical Syntactic Models of Human Incremental Sentence Processing , 2012, CMCL@NAACL-HLT.

[16]  Gabriella Vigliocco,et al.  Lexical surprisal as a general predictor of reading time , 2012, EACL.

[17]  Hartmut Fitz,et al.  Getting real about Semantic Illusions: Rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension , 2012, Brain Research.

[18]  C. Van Petten,et al.  Lexical versus conceptual anticipation during sentence processing: frontal positivity and N400 ERP components. , 2012, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[19]  Karsten Steinhauer,et al.  On the early left-anterior negativity (ELAN) in syntax studies , 2012, Brain and Language.

[20]  C. Van Petten,et al.  Prediction during language comprehension: benefits, costs, and ERP components. , 2012, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[21]  Stefan Frank,et al.  Early effects of word surprisal on pupil size during reading , 2012, CogSci.

[22]  Mark Johnson,et al.  Using Language Models and Latent Semantic Analysis to Characterise the N400m Neural Response , 2011, ALTA.

[23]  S. Frank,et al.  Insensitivity of the Human Sentence-Processing System to Hierarchical Structure , 2011, Psychological science.

[24]  John T. Hale,et al.  What a Rational Parser Would Do , 2011, Cogn. Sci..

[25]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Isn't It Ironic? An Electrophysiological Exploration of Figurative Language Processing , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  John Hale,et al.  Parallel processing and sentence comprehension difficulty , 2011 .

[27]  Roger Levy,et al.  Cloze but no cigar: The complex relationship between cloze, corpus, and subjective probabilities in language processing , 2011, CogSci.

[28]  T. Florian Jaeger,et al.  Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information density , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  Stefan Frank,et al.  Uncertainty Reduction as a Measure of Cognitive Processing Effort , 2010, CMCL@ACL.

[30]  John Hoeks,et al.  Modeling the Noun Phrase versus Sentence Coordination Ambiguity in Dutch: Evidence from Surprisal Theory , 2010, CMCL@ACL.

[31]  Frank Keller,et al.  Syntactic and Semantic Factors in Processing Difficulty: An Integrated Measure , 2010, ACL.

[32]  Stephen T. Wu,et al.  Complexity Metrics in an Incremental Right-Corner Parser , 2010, ACL.

[33]  D. Poeppel,et al.  The linguistic processes underlying the P600 , 2010 .

[34]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  A Usage-Based Approach to Recursion in Sentence Processing , 2009 .

[35]  Brian Roark,et al.  Deriving lexical and syntactic expectation-based measures for psycholinguistic modeling via incremental top-down parsing , 2009, EMNLP.

[36]  Frank Keller,et al.  Data from eye-tracking corpora as evidence for theories of syntactic processing complexity , 2008, Cognition.

[37]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Parsing costs as predictors of reading difficulty: An evaluation using the Potsdam Sentence Corpus , 2008, Journal of Eye Movement Research.

[38]  R. Levy.  Expectation-based syntactic comprehension , 2008, Cognition.

[39]  Peter,et al.  Semantic Unification , 2008 .

[40]  B. Velichkovsky,et al.  Eye typing in application: A comparison of two interfacing systems with ALS patients , 2008 .

[41]  Nathaniel J. Smith,et al.  Optimal Processing Times in Reading: A Formal Model and Empirical Investigation , 2008 .

[42]  Riitta Salmelin,et al.  Localization of Syntactic and Semantic Brain Responses using Magnetoencephalography , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[43]  Gina R. Kuperberg,et al.  Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax , 2007, Brain Research.

[44]  Mante S. Nieuwland,et al.  Establishing reference in language comprehension: An electrophysiological perspective , 2007, Brain Research.

[45]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Mapping sentence form onto meaning: The syntax–semantic interface , 2007, Brain Research.

[46]  D. Caplan,et al.  The role of animacy and thematic relationships in processing active English sentences: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2007, Brain and Language.

[47]  Mante S. Nieuwland,et al.  Individual differences and contextual bias in pronoun resolution: Evidence from ERPs , 2006, Brain Research.

[48]  John Hale,et al.  Uncertainty About the Rest of the Sentence , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[49]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  The role of structural prediction in rapid syntactic analysis , 2006, Brain and Language.

[50]  C. Petten,et al.  Neural localization of semantic context effects in electromagnetic and hemodynamic studies , 2006, Brain and Language.

[51]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Frequency and predictability effects on event-related potentials during reading , 2006, Brain Research.

[52]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[53]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Alternatives to the combinatorial paradigm of linguistic theory based on domain general principles of human cognition , 2005 .

[54]  Katherine A. DeLong,et al.  Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[55]  John C J Hoeks,et al.  Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[56]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Expecting Gender: An Event Related Brain Potential Study on the Role of Grammatical Gender in Comprehending a Line Drawing Within a Written Sentence in Spanish , 2003, Cortex.

[57]  E. Kaan,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for serial sentence processing: a comparison between non-preferred and ungrammatical continuations. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[58]  Dan Klein,et al.  Accurate Unlexicalized Parsing , 2003, ACL.

[59]  John Hale,et al.  The Information Conveyed by Words in Sentences , 2003, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[60]  E. Kaan,et al.  Repair, Revision, and Complexity in Syntactic Analysis: An Electrophysiological Differentiation , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[61]  Andreas Stolcke,et al.  SRILM - an extensible language modeling toolkit , 2002, INTERSPEECH.

[62]  A. Friederici.  Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[63]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Switching Languages, Switching Palabras (Words): An Electrophysiological Study of Code Switching , 2002, Brain and Language.

[64]  John Hale,et al.  A Probabilistic Earley Parser as a Psycholinguistic Model , 2001, NAACL.

[65]  Brian Roark,et al.  Probabilistic Top-Down Parsing and Language Modeling , 2001, CL.

[66]  Danqi Chen,et al.  of the Association for Computational Linguistics: , 2001 .

[67]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[68]  A D Friederici,et al.  Brain responses during sentence reading: visual input affects central processes. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[69]  F ChenStanley,et al.  An Empirical Study of Smoothing Techniques for Language Modeling , 1996, ACL.

[70]  A. Friederici,et al.  Lexical integration: Sequential effects of syntactic and semantic information , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[71]  Andrew C Papanicolaou,et al.  Source localization of the N400 response in a sentence-reading paradigm using evoked magnetic fields and magnetic resonance imaging , 1997, Brain Research.

[72]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[73]  D. Swinney,et al.  Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[74]  A Ordóñez,et al.  Linguistic processes. , 1993, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[75]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly , 1992 .

[76]  M. Garrett,et al.  Syntactically Based Sentence Processing Classes: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[77]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Finding Structure in Time , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[78]  Beatrice Santorini,et al.  Part-of-Speech Tagging Guidelines for the Penn Treebank Project (3rd Revision) , 1990 .

[79]  Beatrice Santorini.  Part-of-speech tagging guidelines for the penn treebank project , 1990 .

[80]  M. Kutas,et al.  Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.

[81]  N. Draper,et al.  An Alternative Family of Transformations , 1980 .