Digitized indigenous knowledge collections: Impact on cultural knowledge transmission, social connections, and cultural identity

This research examines the impact of digitized and digital indigenous knowledge collections (D‐IKC) on cultural knowledge transmission, social connections, and cultural identity through semi‐structured interviews with 8 users of D‐IKC in New Zealand. The participants acknowledged that D‐IKC brought about many benefits, including the surfacing of otherwise hidden or inaccessible cultural heritage. Concerns around digital access, digital competency, and responsiveness to cultural values need to be thoughtfully addressed nevertheless. Use of D‐IKC had impact not only at an individual level but also at a social‐community level. We highlight several traditional cultural values related to D‐IKC use that are not embodied in existing value‐impact frameworks. This research also found that the intersection and interactions among individual needs, cultural expectations, and norms and affordances around the digital information environments concerned were nuanced and multifaceted. These facets must be incorporated into the stewardship of knowledge collections. We also observed “digital knowledge sharing in the wild”—knowledge transmission that transpired and in some cases led to creation of knowledge resources that materialized outside the bounds of the originating repositories and institutions. Further studies into such self‐organized knowledge transmission/sharing phenomena can lead to valuable insights to inform and shape the curation and design of D‐IKC.

[1]  A. Butcher,et al.  Social Cohesion: A Policy and Indicator Framework for Assessing Immigrant and Host Outcomes , 2005 .

[2]  S. Pitama,et al.  The Hui Process: a framework to enhance the doctor-patient relationship with Māori. , 2011, The New Zealand medical journal.

[3]  Simon Tanner,et al.  Measuring the Impact of Digital Resources: The Balanced Value Impact Model , 2012 .

[4]  Sikke R. Jansma,et al.  Citizens' intentions to participate in governmental co-creation initiatives: Comparing three co-creation configurations , 2019, Gov. Inf. Q..

[5]  Jody DeRidder,et al.  Surveying the Landscape: Use and Usability Assessment of Digital Libraries , 2016 .

[6]  S. Dwyer,et al.  The Space Between: On Being an Insider-Outsider in Qualitative Research , 2009 .

[7]  Santi Thompson,et al.  Reverse Image Lookup: Assessing Digital Library Users and Reuses , 2017 .

[8]  R. Ka'ai-Mahuta The use of digital technology in the preservation of Māori song , 2012 .

[9]  Liz Woolcott,et al.  Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects , 2017 .

[10]  T. Jensen,et al.  The social fabric framework: steps to eliciting the social making of organisations in the digital age , 2021, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Liz Woolcott,et al.  Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects: Preliminary Findings from the IMLS-funded Project , 2018, JCDL.

[12]  Liz Woolcott,et al.  Use v. Reuse: Assessing the Value of our Digital Collections , 2018 .

[13]  Rupert Ashmore,et al.  ‘Far isn’t far’: Shetland on the internet , 2013 .

[14]  S. Tiakiwai,et al.  A Literature Review focused on Virtual Learning Environments ( VLEs ) and e-Learning in the Context of Te Reo M ā ori and Kaupapa M ā ori Education Report to the Ministry of Education , 2010 .

[15]  Sara Mannheimer,et al.  Discovery and Reuse of Open Datasets: An Exploratory Study , 2016 .

[16]  Ricardo L. Punzalan,et al.  Stories of impact: the role of narrative in understanding the value and impact of digital collections , 2015, Archival Science.

[17]  Daniel H. Mutibwa Memory, Storytelling and the Digital Archive: Revitalising Community and Regional Identities in the Virtual Age , 2016 .

[18]  Rodney Harrison,et al.  Heritage as Social Action , 2010 .

[19]  Lydia Buchtmann Digital Songlines: The Use of Modern Communication Technology by an Aboriginal Community in Remote Australia , 2000 .

[20]  Michael Fagence,et al.  Understanding heritage in practice , 2011 .

[21]  Jane Hunter,et al.  Libraries and knowledge centres: Implementing public library services in remote indigenous communities in the northern territory of australia , 2007 .

[22]  H. Kanuka,et al.  Has e-Learning Delivered on Its Promises? Expert Opinion on the Impact of e-Learning in Higher Education , 2008 .

[23]  A. Byrne Institutional memory and memory institutions , 2015 .

[24]  Maria Bargh,et al.  Promoting Engagement Through a Student-Built Digital Atlas of Maori Studies , 2013 .

[25]  Te Taka Adrian Gregory Keegan,et al.  Indigenous Language Usage in a Digital Library: He Hautoa Kia Ora Tonu Ai. , 2007 .

[26]  Changsoo Song,et al.  Factors explaining why some citizens engage in E-participation, while others do not , 2020, Gov. Inf. Q..

[27]  Jari Multisilta,et al.  Digital storytelling promoting twenty-first century skills and student engagement , 2016 .

[28]  Kimberly Christen Tribal Archives, Traditional Knowledge, and Local Contexts: Why the “s” Matters , 2015 .

[29]  Crookston Mark,et al.  Kōrero Kitea: Ngā hua o te whakamamatitanga: The impacts of digitised te reo archival collections , 2016 .

[30]  Debra Lynn Capponi Perceptions of Digital Libraries with Indigenous Knowledge: An Exploratory Study , 2010 .

[31]  Ray Lyons,et al.  Duck Soup and Library Outcome Evaluation , 2012, Public Libr. Q..

[32]  Barbara L. Gross,et al.  Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values , 1991 .

[33]  Simon Tanner,et al.  Measuring the impact of digitized resources: The Balanced Value Model , 2013, 2013 Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHeritage).

[34]  G. R. B. Galindo 6 The Unesco Declaration concerning the Intentional Destruction of Cultural Heritage , 2008 .

[35]  Stephann Makri,et al.  Information informing design: Information Science research with implications for the design of digital information environments , 2020, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[36]  New Zealand.,et al.  "HOW FAR ARE UNIVERSITIES CHANGING AND SHAPING OUR WORLD" TOWARDS SOCIAL COHESION: THE INDIGENISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN NEW ZEALAND , 2009 .

[37]  Inge Kral Youth media as cultural practice: remote Indigenous youth speaking out loud , 2011 .

[38]  D. Bainbridge,et al.  He Matapihi Mā Mua, Mō Muri: The Ethics, Processes, and Procedures Associated with the Digitization of Indigenous Knowledge—The Pei Jones Collection , 2015 .

[39]  Jonathan A. Smith,et al.  Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research , 2009, QMiP Bulletin.

[40]  Into the Wild: Beyond the Design Research Lab , 2020, Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics.

[41]  J. Haider,et al.  Development and the Documentation of Indigenous Knowledge: Good Intentions in Bad Company? , 2010 .

[42]  B. Penders,et al.  Research in the wild , 2007, Nature.

[43]  C. Liew,et al.  Perceived value of digital components in library programmes: The case of Auckland Libraries' Dare to Explore summer reading programme , 2018, Library & Information Science Research.

[44]  Ricardo L. Punzalan,et al.  Beyond Clicks, Likes, and Downloads: Identifying Meaningful Impacts for Digitized Ethnographic Archives , 2017 .

[45]  Roswitha Poll Measuring impact and outcome of libraries , 2003 .