Transfer Function Method for Predicting the Emissions in a CISPR-25 Test-Setup

The CISPR-25 standard is used in the automotive industry to characterize the electromagnetic radiation of electronic components. The setup is comprised of an electronic device, a cable harness, a metallic table, and an antenna. Dimensions stretch from a couple of meters for the setup to fractions of a millimeter for printed circuit board features. Numerical prediction of radiated emissions (RE) is of great usefulness for prediction of potential electromagnetic compatibility nonconformities in the early design process, but extremely difficult to be done for this setup as a whole. In this paper, we demonstrate how RE can efficiently be computed based on a setup as commonly used to model conducted emissions only, i.e., electric control unit and harness on infinite-ground plane. Applying Huygens principle and using it to generate a fixed transfer function between a particularly chosen Huygens surface and the antenna, we arrive at a novel computing scheme for RE. The scheme is applied for the antenna model and antenna factor-based calculations and demonstrates agreement with measurements within 5 dB range.

[1]  Roger F. Harrington,et al.  Field computation by moment methods , 1968 .

[2]  O. Zienkiewicz,et al.  The coupling of the finite element method and boundary solution procedures , 1977 .

[3]  T. Sarkar,et al.  Analysis of Multiconductor Transmission Lines , 1988, 31st ARFTG Conference Digest.

[4]  C. Balanis Advanced Engineering Electromagnetics , 1989 .

[5]  Allen Taflove,et al.  Computational Electrodynamics the Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method , 1995 .

[6]  Jianming Jin,et al.  On the formulation of hybrid finite-element and boundary-integral methods for 3-D scattering , 1998 .

[7]  R. Weigel,et al.  EMC Modelling Strategy For Automotive Applications , 1999, 1999 29th European Microwave Conference.

[8]  A. Kriz,et al.  Analysis of the CISPR 25 component test setup , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2003. EMC '03..

[9]  D. Warkentin,et al.  Shielded enclosure accuracy improvements for MIL-STD-461E radiated emissions measurements , 2005, 2005 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2005. EMC 2005..

[10]  Stephan Frei,et al.  Enhanced MoM scheme with incorporation of general N-port networks in application to automotive EMC problems , 2007, 2007 18th International Zurich Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[11]  R. Mittra,et al.  An Effective Technique for System-Level Prediction of the Radiated Emissions of Unknown Sources Inside Low-${Q}$ Cavities Using Unit-Level Measurements , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[12]  Craig W. Fanning Improving monopole radiated emission measurement accuracy; RF chamber influences, antenna height and counterpoise grounding (CISPR 25 & MIL-STD-461E vs MIL-STD-461F) , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[13]  I. Sharaa,et al.  EMC Model-Based Test-Setup of an Electrical System , 2009 .

[14]  Holger Hirsch,et al.  Proposal for the validation of absorber lined shielded enclosures for CISPR 25 emission tests , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[15]  R. Weigel,et al.  Simulation of automotive EMC emission test procedures based on cable bundle measurements , 2012, 2012 IEEE/MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest.