Sensitivity and uncertainty quantification for the ECOSTRESS evapotranspiration algorithm - DisALEXI

Abstract Evapotranspiration (ET) is a measure of plant water use that is utilized regionally for drought detection and monitoring, and locally for agricultural water resource management. Understanding the uncertainty associated with this measurement is vital for science predictions and analysis and for water resource management decision making. In this manuscript, the uncertainty in disaggregated Atmosphere-Land Exchange (disALEXI) is quantified; disALEXI is an ET algorithm that utilizes land surface temperature (LST) derived from the ECOsystem Spaceborne Thermal Radiometer Experiment on Space Station (ECOSTRESS), as well ancillary inputs for landcover, elevation, vegetation parameters, and meteorological inputs. Since each of these inputs has an associated, and potentially unknown, uncertainty, in this study a Monte Carlo simulation based on a spatial statistical model is used to determine the algorithm's sensitivity to each of its inputs, and to quantify the probability distribution of algorithm outputs. Analysis shows that algorithm is most sensitive to LST (the input derived from ECOSTRESS). Significantly, the output uncertainty distribution is non-Gaussian, due to the non-linear nature of the algorithm. This means that ET uncertainty cannot be prescribed by accuracy and precision alone. Here, uncertainty was represented using five quantiles of the output distribution. The distribution was consistent across five different datasets (mean offset is 0.01 mm/day, and 95% of the data is contained within 0.3 mm/day). An additional two datasets with low ET, showed higher uncertainty (95% of the data is within 1 mm/day), and a positive bias (i.e., ET was overestimated by an average of 0.12 mm/day when ET was low).

[1]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Global statistical analysis of MISR aerosol data: a massive data product from NASA's Terra satellite , 2007 .

[2]  Suming Jin,et al.  Completion of the 2011 National Land Cover Database for the Conterminous United States – Representing a Decade of Land Cover Change Information , 2015 .

[3]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  Mapping daily evapotranspiration at Landsat spatial scales during the BEAREX’08 field campaign , 2012 .

[4]  J. Norman,et al.  Remote sensing of surface energy fluxes at 101‐m pixel resolutions , 2003 .

[5]  Gregoire Mariethoz,et al.  A Bayesian analysis of sensible heat flux estimation: Quantifying uncertainty in meteorological forcing to improve model prediction , 2013 .

[6]  Emily L. Kang,et al.  A Fused Gaussian Process Model for Very Large Spatial Data , 2017, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics.

[7]  Richard G. Allen,et al.  Satellite-Based Energy Balance for Mapping Evapotranspiration with Internalized Calibration (METRIC)—Model , 2007 .

[8]  Emily L. Kang,et al.  Spatial Statistical Downscaling for Constructing High-Resolution Nature Runs in Global Observing System Simulation Experiments , 2019, Technometrics.

[9]  Christian P. Robert,et al.  Statistics for Spatio-Temporal Data , 2014 .

[10]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Using temporal variability to improve spatial mapping with application to satellite data , 2010 .

[11]  Emily L. Kang,et al.  Fused Gaussian Process for Very Large Spatial Data , 2017, 1702.08797.

[12]  Feng Gao,et al.  The Evaporative Stress Index as an indicator of agricultural drought in Brazil: An assessment based on crop yield impacts , 2016 .

[13]  Minha Choi,et al.  Stand-alone uncertainty characterization of GLEAM, GLDAS and MOD16 evapotranspiration products using an extended triple collocation approach , 2018 .

[14]  Carlos Jimenez,et al.  On Uncertainty in Global Terrestrial Evapotranspiration Estimates from Choice of Input Forcing Datasets , 2015 .

[15]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  A Multiscale Remote Sensing Model for Disaggregating Regional Fluxes to Micrometeorological Scales , 2004 .

[16]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  A Two-Source Time-Integrated Model for Estimating Surface Fluxes Using Thermal Infrared Remote Sensing , 1997 .

[17]  Hsin-Cheng Huang,et al.  Resolution Adaptive Fixed Rank Kriging , 2018, Technometrics.

[18]  J. Norman,et al.  Source approach for estimating soil and vegetation energy fluxes in observations of directional radiometric surface temperature , 1995 .

[19]  Mike Rees,et al.  5. Statistics for Spatial Data , 1993 .

[20]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data, Revised Edition. , 1994 .

[21]  P. van der Zaag,et al.  Mapping evapotranspiration trends using MODIS and SEBAL model in a data scarce and heterogeneous landscape in Eastern Africa , 2013 .

[22]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  The future of evapotranspiration: Global requirements for ecosystem functioning, carbon and climate feedbacks, agricultural management, and water resources , 2017 .

[23]  D. Baldocchi,et al.  Global estimates of the land–atmosphere water flux based on monthly AVHRR and ISLSCP-II data, validated at 16 FLUXNET sites , 2008 .

[24]  Sudhir Nadiga,et al.  NCEP Climate Forecast System Version 2 (CFSv2) Selected Hourly Time-Series Products , 2011 .

[25]  A. Holtslag,et al.  A remote sensing surface energy balance algorithm for land (SEBAL)-1. Formulation , 1998 .

[26]  Justin L. Huntington,et al.  Assessing Calibration Uncertainty and Automation for Estimating Evapotranspiration from Agricultural Areas Using METRIC , 2013 .

[27]  Z. Su The Surface Energy Balance System ( SEBS ) for estimation of turbulent heat fluxes , 2002 .

[28]  Maosheng Zhao,et al.  Improvements to a MODIS global terrestrial evapotranspiration algorithm , 2011 .

[29]  George P. Petropoulos Remote Sensing of Surface Energy Fluxes: Algorithms and Case Studies , 2013 .

[30]  N. Cressie,et al.  Spatial Statistical Data Fusion for Remote Sensing Applications , 2012 .

[31]  N. Cressie,et al.  Fixed rank kriging for very large spatial data sets , 2008 .

[32]  Kristi Arsenault,et al.  Uncertainties in Evapotranspiration Estimates over West Africa , 2019, Remote. Sens..