The influence of surface topography on the electromechanical characteristics of parallel-plate MEMS capacitors

Variable parallel-plate microelectromechanical system (MEMS) capacitors have been used extensively in various applications. The performances of MEMS capacitors are traditionally predicted by considering the electrodes to be atomically smooth and, therefore, roughness effects are ignored. However, recent studies have shown the significant influence of surface topography on the performance and reliability of microelectronic capacitors and other solid-state devices. Hence, the objective of the present study is to yield insight into the impact of surface topography on the elecromechanical characteristics of MEMS capacitors. Specifically, closed-form analytical solutions are derived for the capacitance, electrostatic force, pull-in gap and voltage, electric field, and adhesion force by utilizing simple roughness representation. The significant effects of surface topography on the performance and reliability of MEMS capacitors are elucidated and discussed in the context of the presented results. Surface topography dominates the electromechanical characteristics of MEMS capacitors via the combinatorial influences of larger surface area and smaller effective gap between the electrodes. It is shown that adhesion forces, typically, have negligible influence on the pull-in phenomenon. More accurate description of the roughness by utilizing the statistical approach is also considered and a numerical example is presented for MEMS capacitors with polycrystalline silicon electrodes.

[1]  J. Greenwood,et al.  Contact of nominally flat surfaces , 1966, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[2]  W. T. Williams,et al.  Effect of electrode surface finish on electrical breakdown in vacuum , 1972 .

[3]  B. Derjaguin,et al.  On two methods of calculation of the force of sticking of an elastic sphere to a rigid plane , 1983 .

[4]  C. L. Tien,et al.  Fractal Network Model for Contact Conductance , 1991 .

[5]  J. Georges,et al.  The influence of surface roughness on the capacitance between a sphere and a plane , 1994 .

[6]  Hans Reisinger,et al.  Electrical breakdown induced by silicon nitride roughness in thin oxide–nitride–oxide films , 1996 .

[7]  K. Komvopoulos Surface engineering and microtribology for microelectromechanical systems , 1996 .

[8]  J. Barnas,et al.  Surface-roughness fractality effects in electrical conductivity of single metallic and semiconducting films , 1997 .

[9]  An investigation into the applicability of perturbation techniques to solve the boundary integral equations for a parallel-plate capacitor with a rough electrode , 1998 .

[10]  S. Hudlet,et al.  Evaluation of the capacitive force between an atomic force microscopy tip and a metallic surface , 1998 .

[11]  Kyriakos Komvopoulos,et al.  Three-Dimensional Elastic-Plastic Fractal Analysis of Surface Adhesion in Microelectromechanical Systems , 1998 .

[12]  C. Yildiz Influence of anisotropic scattering on the size of time-dependent systems in monoenergetic neutron transport , 1999 .

[13]  Neil C. Bruce,et al.  Rough-surface capacitor: approximations of the capacitance with elementary functions , 1999 .

[14]  William D. Greason Idealized model for charged device electrostatic discharge , 1999 .

[15]  Zhu Changchun,et al.  Electrostatic force influenced by space charge in submicrometer or nanometer silicon microstructures , 1999 .

[16]  Toh-Ming Lu,et al.  Surface-roughness effect on capacitance and leakage current of an insulating film , 1999 .

[17]  M. Esashi,et al.  Micro-discharge and electric breakdown in a micro-gap , 2000 .

[18]  B. Pillans,et al.  Lifetime characterization of capacitive RF MEMS switches , 2001, 2001 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Sympsoium Digest (Cat. No.01CH37157).

[19]  Yao Yang,et al.  Effect of SiO2/Si interface roughness on gate current , 2001, Microelectron. Reliab..

[20]  O. Degani,et al.  A methodology and model for the pull-in parameters of electrostatic actuators , 2001 .

[21]  G. Palasantzas,et al.  The effect of mound roughness on the electrical capacitance of a thin insulating film , 2001 .

[22]  Robert Sattler,et al.  Innovative design and modelling of a micromechanical relay with electrostatic actuation , 2001 .

[23]  Rajendra Patrikar,et al.  Modelling interconnects with surface roughness , 2002 .

[24]  George G. Adams,et al.  A dynamic model, including contact bounce, of an electrostatically actuated microswitch , 2002 .

[25]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Electromechanical model of RF MEMS switches , 2003 .

[26]  Andreas A. Polycarpou,et al.  Adhesion and Pull-Off Forces for Polysilicon MEMS Surfaces Using the Sub-Boundary Lubrication Model , 2003 .

[27]  P. Krulevitch,et al.  Vertical-actuated electrostatic comb drive with in situ capacitive position correction for application in phase shifting diffraction interferometry , 2003 .

[28]  L. Kogut,et al.  Electrical contact resistance as a diagnostic tool for MEMS contact interfaces , 2004, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[29]  Guoxiao Guo,et al.  Design, fabrication and characterization of single crystal silicon microactuator for hard disk drives , 2004 .

[30]  Michael Kraft,et al.  Modelling And Analysis Of A MEMS Approach To DC Voltage Step Up Conversion , 2004 .

[31]  R. Patrikar Modeling and simulation of surface roughness , 2004 .

[32]  Bernard H. Stark,et al.  MEMS electrostatic micropower generator for low frequency operation , 2004 .

[33]  A. Asundi,et al.  An approach to the coupling effect between torsion and bending for electrostatic torsional micromirrors , 2004 .

[34]  Rudra Pratap,et al.  Coupled nonlinear effects of surface roughness and rarefaction on squeeze film damping in MEMS structures , 2004 .

[35]  Leslie M. Phinney,et al.  Surface roughness measurements of micromachined polycrystalline silicon films , 2004 .