Efficiency of policy instruments for CCS deployment

Policy instruments for carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology investment during the learning phase are analysed and compared. The focus is on specific barriers to investment in learning during early commercial deployment. Imperfections in the carbon price signal and market failures from barriers indicate a need for support during the learning investment phase and the initial roll out of CCS in electricity generation. Different ways for CCS technology to cross the so-called investment ‘death valley’ are analysed and compared: a command and control instrument (CCS mandate), investment support (grant, tax credit, loan guarantee, subsidy by trust fund) and production subsidies (guaranteed carbon price, feed-in price, etc.). Three criteria are used in this comparison: effectiveness, static efficiency and dynamic efficiency. Policy instruments need to be adapted to the technological and commercial maturity of the CCS system. Mandate policies require handling with much care, and subsidization mechanisms must be designed to be market-oriented.

[1]  Paul L. Joskow,et al.  Lessons Learned From Electricity Market Liberalization , 2008 .

[2]  Aie,et al.  CO2 Capture and Storage: A Key Carbon Abatement Option , 2008 .

[3]  D. Newbery,et al.  Carbon capture and storage (CCS) analysis of incentives and rules in a European repeated game situation , 2009 .

[4]  D. Finon,et al.  Option values of low carbon technology policies: how to combine irreversibility effects and learning-by-doing in decisions , 2010 .

[5]  G. O’Brien.  A Blueprint for a Safer Planet: How to Manage Climate Change and Create a New Era of Progress and Prosperity , 2012 .

[6]  R. Farmer,et al.  Intertemporal effects of environmental mandates , 1997 .

[7]  Robert W. Fri,et al.  The Role of Knowledge: Technological Innovation in the Energy System , 2003 .

[8]  V. Sorana.  Auctions for Universal Service Subsidies , 2000 .

[9]  Cameron Hepburn,et al.  Credible Carbon Policy , 2003 .

[10]  K. Neuhoff,et al.  Commitments through Financial Options A Way to Facilitate Compliance with Climate Change Obligations , 2006 .

[11]  J. Bielicki.  Returns to Scale in Carbon Capture and Storage Infrastructure and Deployment , 2008 .

[12]  Catherine Mitchell,et al.  Effectiveness through risk reduction: a comparison of the renewable obligation in England and Wales and the feed-in system in Germany , 2006 .

[13]  R. Cowan.  Nuclear Power Reactors: A Study in Technological Lock-in , 1990, The Journal of Economic History.

[14]  Dr Jon Gibbins.  Carbon Capture and Storage , 2005 .

[15]  Nathan E. Hultman,et al.  A reactor-level analysis of busbar costs for US nuclear plants, 1970-2005 , 2007 .

[16]  J. Sawin,et al.  National Policy Instruments - Policy Lessons for the Advancement & Diffusion of Renewable Energy Technologies Around the World , 2004 .

[17]  Björn A. Sandén,et al.  Near-term technology policies for long-term climate targets—economy wide versus technology specific approaches , 2005 .

[18]  Irvin C. Bupp,et al.  Light water : how the nuclear dream dissolved , 1979 .

[19]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  Cost and economic potential , 2005 .

[20]  K. Pavitt.  Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[21]  E. Prescott,et al.  Investment Under Uncertainty , 1971 .

[22]  R. Green,et al.  Investment and Generation Capacity , 2006 .

[23]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  Cost and performance of fossil fuel power plants with CO2 capture and storage , 2007 .

[24]  Yannick Perez,et al.  The social efficiency of instruments of promotion of renewable energies: A transaction-cost perspective , 2007 .

[25]  A. Jaffe,et al.  A tale of two market failures: Technology and environmental policy , 2005 .

[26]  François Lévêque,et al.  Competitive Electricity Markets and Sustainability , 2006 .

[27]  Mads Greaker,et al.  Explaining experience curves for new energy technologies: A case study of liquefied natural gas , 2008 .

[28]  Heleen Groenenberg,et al.  Effective EU and Member State policies for stimulating CCS , 2008 .

[29]  Mario Ragwitz,et al.  On the Success of Policy Strategies for the Promotion of Electricity from Renewable Energy Sources in the Eu , 2006 .