Parallel business models and the innovativeness of research-based spin-off ventures

Research-Based Spin-Offs (RBSOs) are seen as a potential mechanism for technology transfer by commercializing academic research and thereby stimulate industrial innovation. RBSOs are heterogeneous, however, and in this paper we investigate how the use of different business models by RBSOs is related to their innovativeness. We use a sample of 82 young RBSOs from Norway to explore typologies of RBSOs developed in earlier studies. Our findings show that some types of business models are associated with higher innovativeness than others. The typology approach has portrayed RBSOs as if they pursue only one business model. In this paper we challenge this assumption by drawing on evolutionary theory and the idea that firms may follow several business models in parallel. Our empirical findings suggest that most RBSOs pursue several business models in parallel and that such firms are more innovative. This study extends the typology approach within the academic entrepreneurship literature by showing that some business models are associated with higher innovativeness than others and that firms pursuing several business models at the same time may be particularly important for the commercialization of academic research. These findings have important implications for research and practise.

[1]  E. Garnsey,et al.  High‐technology clustering through spin‐out and attraction: The Cambridge case , 2005 .

[2]  Rosanna Garcia,et al.  A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review , 2002 .

[3]  Frédéric Nlemvo,et al.  Toward a Typology of University Spin-offs , 2003 .

[4]  Mike Wright,et al.  Entrepreneurship and University Technology Transfer , 2004 .

[5]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Objectives, Characteristics and Outcomes of University Licensing: A Survey of Major U.S. Universities , 2001 .

[6]  Martin Meyer,et al.  Academic Inventiveness and Entrepreneurship: On the Importance of Start-up Companies in Commercializing Academic Patents , 2006 .

[7]  Junfu Zhang,et al.  The performance of university spin-offs: an exploratory analysis using venture capital data , 2009 .

[8]  Stephen K. Markham,et al.  The university's role in creating radically new products , 2002 .

[9]  Elizabeth Garnsey,et al.  Do Academic Spin-Outs Differ and Does it Matter? , 2004 .

[10]  Autio Erkko,et al.  New, technology–based firms as agents of technological rejuvenation , 1998 .

[11]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[12]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  The Agenda for Growth Theory: A Different Point of View , 1998 .

[13]  Mike Wright,et al.  Convergence or path dependency in policies to foster the creation of university spin-off firms? A comparison of France and the United Kingdom , 2010 .

[14]  D. Mowery,et al.  The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and University--Industry Technology Transfer: A Model for Other OECD Governments? , 2004 .

[15]  Andrea Piccaluga,et al.  Exploitation and diffusion of public research: the case of academic spin-off companies in Italy , 2000 .

[16]  Einar Rasmussen,et al.  Government instruments to support the commercialization of university research: Lessons from Canada , 2008 .

[17]  Mike Wright,et al.  The Evolution of Entrepreneurial Competencies: A Longitudinal Study of University Spin‐Off Venture Emergence , 2011 .

[18]  Erkko Autio,et al.  New, technology-based firms as agents of R&D and innovation: an empirical study , 1994 .

[19]  E. Penrose.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[20]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[21]  S. Shane.  Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities , 2000 .

[22]  B. Clarysse,et al.  Institutional change and resource endowments to science-based entrepreneurial firms , 2005 .

[23]  A. McGahan,et al.  Business-Model Innovation: General Purpose Technologies and their Implications for Industry Structure , 2010 .

[24]  Marc Gruber,et al.  Look Before You Leap: Market Opportunity Identification in Emerging Technology Firms , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[25]  Rikard Stankiewicz,et al.  Spin-off companies from universities , 1994 .

[26]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[27]  Rita Gunther McGrath.  Business Models: A Discovery Driven Approach , 2010 .

[28]  Riccardo Fini,et al.  Factors fostering academics to start up new ventures: an assessment of Italian founders’ incentives , 2009 .

[29]  Scott Shane,et al.  Industry changes in technology and complementary assets and the creation of high-growth firms , 2011 .

[30]  Thomas Ritter,et al.  The impact of network capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation on university spin-off performance , 2006 .

[31]  Fred Pries,et al.  Commercial Exploitation of New Technologies Arising from University Research: Start-Ups and Markets for Technology , 2007 .

[32]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  Knowledge conversion capability and the performance of corporate and university spin-offs , 2007 .

[33]  Scott Shane,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Organizational Endowments and the Performance of University Start-ups , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[34]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[35]  Nina Rosenbusch,et al.  Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs , 2011 .

[36]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  The Role of the Business Model in Capturing Value from Innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation's Technology Spin-Off Companies , 2002 .

[37]  B. Clarysse,et al.  How and Why do Research-Based Start-Ups Differ at Founding? A Resource-Based Configurational Perspective , 2004 .

[38]  Erwin Danneels,et al.  THE PROCESS OF TECHNOLOGICAL COMPETENCE LEVERAGING , 2007 .

[39]  Magnus Gulbrandsen,et al.  Initiatives to promote commercialization of university knowledge , 2006 .

[40]  Mike Wright,et al.  Conceptualising the heterogeneity of research-based spin-offs: A multi-dimensional taxonomy , 2006 .

[41]  M. Fontes.  The process of transformation of scientific and technological knowledge into economic value conducted by biotechnology spin-offs , 2005 .

[42]  Raphael Amit,et al.  Business Model Design and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Firms , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[43]  Evila Piva,et al.  The contribution of university research to the growth of academic start-ups: an empirical analysis , 2010 .

[44]  R. Nelson.  The Role of Firm differences in An evolutionary Theory Of technical Advance , 1991 .

[45]  R. Rumelt.  How much does industry matter , 1991 .

[46]  Rosa Grimaldi,et al.  Exploring the Networking Characteristics of New Venture Founding Teams: A Stdy of Italian Academic Spin-off , 2003 .

[47]  Richard T. Harrison,et al.  Maximising the Potential of University Spin-Outs: The Development of Second-Order Commercialisation Activities , 2005 .

[48]  Eric Fang.  Customer Participation and the Trade-Off between New Product Innovativeness and Speed to Market , 2008 .