The price of knowledge in the knowledge economy: Should development of peatland in the UK support a research levy?

Peatlands provide a wide range of ecosystem services, the most important of which are terrestrial carbon storage, maintenance of biodiversity and protection of water resources. Exploitation of UK peatlands may be detrimental to these services, but scientific understanding and quantification of the effects is currently limited. This paper considers the possibility of imposing a levy on the exploitation of peatland, which would be used to fund high-quality prioritised research into the impacts of such human interventions, thereby enabling improvements to environmental management during the development process. The viability of the concept was explored with a group of peatland stakeholders. The group included most of the significant stakeholders with an interest in development on peatland, including regulators, developers and consultants. Qualitative and semi-quantitative responses were gathered by direct consultation with individuals and using a questionnaire to determine group responses. The latter were generally positive. Offered a choice of research funding mechanisms, stakeholders responded most positively to a levy. Whilst other funding mechanisms were also viewed positively a levy (in the form proposed or with some modification) was regarded as equitable by a large majority and workable by a smaller majority. Developers were reluctant to pledge full support to the proposal but recognised the importance of a number of the concerns that it was designed to address.

[1]  Susan E. Ward,et al.  Long-Term Consequences of Grazing and Burning on Northern Peatland Carbon Dynamics , 2007, Ecosystems.

[2]  Des B. A. Thompson,et al.  IUCN UK Commission of Inquiry on Peatlands , 2011 .

[3]  J. Holden,et al.  The impact of peatland drain-blocking on dissolved organic carbon loss and discolouration of water; results from a national survey , 2010 .

[4]  Pete Smith,et al.  Calculating carbon budgets of wind farms on Scottish peatlands , 2009 .

[5]  Roles of Levies for Sustainable Domestic Water Consumption , 2011 .

[6]  Peter Chapman,et al.  Environmental change in moorland landscapes , 2007 .

[7]  D. Monteith,et al.  Export of organic carbon from peat soils , 2001, Nature.

[8]  Third Edition,et al.  THE MEASUREMENT OF SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL ACTIVITIES: PROPOSED GUIDELINES FOR COLLECTING AND INTERPRETING INNOVATION DATA , 2005 .

[9]  Joanna M. Clark,et al.  Carbon balance of UK peatlands: current state of knowledge and future research challenges , 2010 .

[10]  N. Dise Peatland Response to Global Change , 2009, Science.

[11]  Joanna M. Clark,et al.  Assessment of projected changes in upland environments using simple climatic indices , 2010 .

[12]  Adam D. Read,et al.  The UK landfill tax and the landfill tax credit scheme: operational weaknesses , 2001 .

[13]  Johnny Sung,et al.  The Career Choices and Impact of PhD Graduates in the UK: A Synthesis Review Report prepared for the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) "Science in Society" Team and the Research Councils UK (RCUK) Research Careers and Diversity Unit , 2009 .

[14]  Soo Chin Liew,et al.  Remotely sensed evidence of tropical peatland conversion to oil palm , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  B. Clutterbuck,et al.  Land management as a factor controlling dissolved organic carbon release from upland peat soils 1: spatial variation in DOC productivity. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[16]  Anil Graves,et al.  Who ’ s in and why ? Stakeholder analysis as a prerequisite 1 for sustainable natural resource management 2 3 , 2008 .

[17]  Anil Graves,et al.  Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[18]  Joanna M. Clark,et al.  Assessing the vulnerability of blanket peat to climate change using an ensemble of statistical bioclimatic envelope models , 2010 .

[19]  D. Just,et al.  The Social Costs and Benefits of Biofuels: The Intersection of Environmental, Energy and Agricultural Policy , 2010 .

[20]  D. Gilvear,et al.  Effects of wind farm construction on concentrations and fluxes of dissolved organic carbon and suspended sediment from peat catchments at Braes of Doune, central Scotland. , 2008 .

[21]  Rüdiger Pethig,et al.  Pricing the Ecosystem and Taxing Ecosystem Services: A General Equilibrium Approach , 2007, J. Econ. Theory.

[22]  Jeremy Phillipson,et al.  Reflexive Interdisciplinary Research: The Making of a Research Programme on the Rural Economy and Land Use , 2006 .

[23]  C. Bryant,et al.  The significance of organic carbon and nutrient export from peatland-dominated landscapes subject to disturbance, a stoichiometric perspective , 2009 .

[24]  W. Sheate,et al.  Knowledge exchange: a review and research agenda for environmental management , 2012, Environmental Conservation.

[25]  E. Ruto,et al.  Stakeholder engagement and knowledge exchange in environmental research. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[26]  R. Lindsay Peatbogs and carbon: a critical synthesis to inform policy developmentin oceanic peat bog conservation and restoration in the context of climate change. , 2010 .

[27]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[28]  K. Willis,et al.  Biodiversity and Climate Change , 2009, Science.

[29]  P. Morling,et al.  Financing nature in an age of austerity , 2010 .

[30]  Adam D. Read,et al.  A discussion on the various methods of application for landfill tax credit funding for environmental and community projects , 2001 .