Effects of chemoattractant pteridines upon speed of D. discoideum vegetative amoebae.

Movements of D. discoideum vegetative amoebae responding to pteridine chemoattractants, folate acid and pterin, were recorded. A vector analysis of these images was performed to partition the speed and orientation components of these motility patterns. This study demonstrates that in addition to orientation (chemotaxis), stimulated speed (chemokinesis) is an important component of the directed migration of these amoebae. Furthermore, the primary difference in their response to folate versus pterin is in speed rather than orientation. The data support a model of directed migration of these cells in which there are (1) separate signal translation pathways consequent from folate versus pterin reception and (2) specific pathways leading to increase in orientation versus speed.

[1]  P. V. van Haastert,et al.  Antagonists of chemoattractants reveal separate receptors for cAMP, folic acid and pterin in Dictyostelium. , 1982, Experimental cell research.

[2]  J. L. Rifkin.  Quantitative analysis of the behavior of Dictyostelium discoideum amoebae: stringency of pteridine reception. , 2002, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[3]  P. V. Haastert,et al.  Binding of folates to Dictyostelium discoideum cells. Demonstration of five classes of binding sites and their interconversion , 1985 .

[4]  G. Fraenkel,et al.  The Orientation of Animals, Kineses, Taxes and Compass Reactions, , 1941 .

[5]  J. Bonner,et al.  Folic acid as second chemotactic substance in the cellular slime moulds. , 1972, Nature: New biology.

[6]  J. Bonner,et al.  Evidence for the formation of cell aggregates by chemotaxis in the development of the slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum. , 1947, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[7]  J. Bonner,et al.  Determination of the active portion of the folic acid molecule in cellular slime mold chemotaxis , 1975, Journal of bacteriology.

[8]  D. Soll,et al.  Chemoresponsiveness to cAMP and folic acid during growth, development, and dedifferentiation in Dictyostelium discoideum. , 1981, Differentiation; research in biological diversity.

[9]  J. L. Rifkin,et al.  Effects of pteridines on the filopodia of Dictyostelium discoideum vegetative amoebae. , 1986, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[10]  J. L. Rifkin,et al.  Effects of folic acid upon filopodia of Dictyostelium discoideum vegetative amoebae. , 1984, Cell motility.

[11]  [3H]Methotrexate as a ligand for the folate receptor of Dictyostelium discoideum. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  M. McCutcheon,et al.  Chemotaxis in leukocytes. , 1946, Physiological reviews.

[13]  G. Laevsky,et al.  Under-agarose folate chemotaxis of Dictyostelium discoideum amoebae in permissive and mechanically inhibited conditions. , 2001, BioTechniques.

[14]  P. Fisher,et al.  Quantitative analysis of cell motility and chemotaxis in Dictyostelium discoideum by using an image processing system and a novel chemotaxis chamber providing stationary chemical gradients , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.