Factors affecting internal mammary artery graft survival: how is competitive flow from a patent native coronary vessel a risk factor?

Recent studies have suggested that competitive flow is an important factor in early internal mammary artery (IMA) graft failure. Flow competition from minimally diseased native coronary vessels has been implicated in the failure of IMA grafts, but does not seem to affect saphenous vein grafts (SVG). The objective of this study was to determine the effects of competitive flow on SVG and IMA grafts and to compare the patterns of flow dynamics and pressure on proximal and distal grafts to the left anterior descending (LAD) artery; factors that may be involved in graft failure. Twelve mongrel dogs underwent coronary artery bypass grafting using IMAs and a SVG to an open LAD artery. The right IMA (PIMA) and the SVG were anastomosed in the proximal LAD and the left IMA (DIMA) was anastomosed at a more distal location. The procedure was performed through a left thoracotomy, using an "off pump" technique. Graft flows were measured isolated and in competition. The IMAs and SVG provided flow levels similar to the native LAD when each one was the sole inflow to the LAD. During competitive flow conditions, total and diastolic SVG flows were reduced 54.4 and 50.5%, respectively (P < 0.05). Total and diastolic PIMA and DIMA flows were reduced more drastically (68.6-73.3 and 69.5-68.1%, respectively; P < 0.05). The DIMA had better preservation of diastolic flow compared to PIMA. A delay in the pressure wave was noted in the isolated IMAs, but not in the SVG. This pattern of flow disappeared during competition due to the large, systolic retrograde flow up the IMA grafts. In conclusion, IMAs compared to the SVG are longer and narrower conduits with lower levels of flow during competition. Low levels of flow and oscillating flow (retrograde/ antegrade) may be poorly tolerated by the IMA endothelium and may be factorial to graft failure. These data suggest that a more distal placement of the IMA graft may be protective to the arterial graft under competitive flow conditions.

[1]  H. Takemura,et al.  Is internal thoracic artery grafting suitable for a moderately stenotic coronary artery , 1996 .

[2]  H. Takemura,et al.  Physiologic characteristics of coronary artery bypass grafts. , 1993, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[3]  E. Verrier,et al.  Endothelial cell injury in cardiovascular surgery. , 1996, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[4]  K. Kawachi,et al.  A quantitative study of postoperative luminal narrowing of the internal thoracic artery graft in coronary artery bypass surgery. , 1992, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[5]  A. Calafiore,et al.  Composite arterial conduits for a wider arterial myocardial revascularization. , 1994, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[6]  J. A. Sosa,et al.  Internal mammary artery: a "live" conduit for coronary bypass. , 1984, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[7]  W. Chitwood,et al.  Competitive flow from a fully patent coronary artery does not limit acute mammary graft flow. , 1992, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[8]  H. Hirzel,et al.  The internal mammary artery 'string phenomenon'. Analysis of 10 cases. , 1993, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[9]  Y. Takahara,et al.  Comparison of coronary hemodynamics in patients with internal mammary artery and saphenous vein coronary artery bypass grafts: a noninvasive approach using combined two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  F. Loop,et al.  Should coronary arteries with less than fifty percent stenosis be bypassed? , 1981, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[11]  K. Kawachi,et al.  Angiographic demonstration of no-flow anatomical patency of internal thoracic-coronary artery bypass grafts. , 1992, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[12]  W. Chitwood,et al.  Effect of chronic native flow competition on internal thoracic artery grafts. , 1994, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[13]  J. A. Sosa,et al.  Internal mammary artery graft. , 1983, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[14]  H. Urschel,et al.  Operative transluminal balloon angioplasty. Adjunct to coronary bypass for extended myocardial revascularization of more than 3000 lesions in 1000 patients. , 1990, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[15]  F. Sellke,et al.  Endothelial cell injury in cardiovascular surgery: the pathophysiology of vasomotor dysfunction. , 1996, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[16]  B. Dincer,et al.  The "occluded" internal mammary artery graft: restoration of patency after apparent occlusion associated with progression of coronary disease. , 1983, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[17]  Y. Ikari,et al.  Effects of competitive blood flow on arterial graft patency and diameter. Medium-term postoperative follow-up. , 1996, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[18]  D. Doty,et al.  The right gastroepiploic artery graft: Clinical and angiographic midterm results in 200 patients , 1993 .

[19]  W. C. Sheldon,et al.  Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  B L Langille,et al.  Reductions in arterial diameter produced by chronic decreases in blood flow are endothelium-dependent. , 1986, Science.