Structural equation modeling the use of a risk assessment instrument in child protective services

Risk assessment instruments have been developed to help human service workers identify risk factors associated with abusive families. Many such instruments have been incorporated into management information systems in the form of Decision Support Systems (DSS). This paper reports findings from a case study that evaluated a risk assessment instrument as a decision support tool. Respondents considered ''usefulness'' of the information a more important factor than how easy the system was to use, the configuration of reports or whether the system was up or not. Focus groups were used to explore how to increase the usefulness of the information.

[1]  D. Fitch.  Examination of the Child Protective Services Decision-Making Context with Implications for Decision Support System Design , 2006 .

[2]  S. T. Foster,et al.  User involvement during information systems development: a comparison of analyst and user perceptions of system acceptance , 1999 .

[3]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[4]  T. Healy,et al.  Risk assessment in child protective services: consensus and actuarial model reliability. , 1999, Child welfare.

[5]  Dick Schoech,et al.  Human Services Technology: Understanding, Designing, and Implementing Computer and Internet Applications in the Social Services , 1999 .

[6]  Ramesh Sharda,et al.  Effectiveness of decision support systems: development or reliance effect? , 1997, Decis. Support Syst..

[7]  Maryam Alavi,et al.  Revisiting DSS Implementation Research: A Meta-Analysis of the Literature and Suggestions for Researchers , 1992, MIS Q..

[8]  P. Chisnall.  Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method , 2007, Journal of Advertising Research.

[9]  D. Dillman.  Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[10]  Charles L. Smith.  Computer-Supported Decision Making: Meeting the Decision Demands of Modern Organizations , 1998 .

[11]  G Larry Sanders,et al.  MIS/DSS success measure , 1984 .

[12]  Deepinder S. Bajwa,et al.  Key antecedents of Executive Information System success: a path analytic approach , 1998, Decis. Support Syst..

[13]  William J. Doll,et al.  A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the End-User Computing Satisfaction Instrument , 1994, MIS Q..

[14]  C. R. Franz,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT, USER INVOLVEMENT, AND THE USEFULNESS OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS* , 1986 .

[15]  M. Couper.  A REVIEW OF ISSUES AND APPROACHES , 2000 .

[16]  L. Binder.  Hemispheric specialization. , 1988, The Psychiatric clinics of North America.

[17]  Fred Niederman,et al.  DSS theory: A model of constructs and relationships , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[18]  William R. King,et al.  Note-Participative Design of Strategic Decision Support Systems: An Empirical Assessment , 1981 .

[19]  Csp Michael C. Kettelhut,et al.  Programmers, Analysts and Human Service Workers , 1991 .

[20]  James F. Courtney,et al.  A Field Study of Organizational Factors Influencing DSS Success , 1985, MIS Q..

[21]  Sydney Gregory,et al.  Systems: objectives: solutions , 1982 .

[22]  Sammy W. Pearson,et al.  Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction , 1983 .

[23]  Menachem Monnickendam.  Computer Systems that Work , 2000 .

[24]  Evan E. Anderson,et al.  The implementation of information systems for workers: A structural equation model , 1989, Inf. Manag..

[25]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[26]  E. Munro,et al.  Common errors of reasoning in child protection work. , 1999, Child abuse & neglect.

[27]  Edward J. Garrity,et al.  Dimensions of information systems success , 1998 .

[28]  Roger McHaney,et al.  A validation of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument in Taiwan , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[29]  Varghese S. Jacob,et al.  Hemispheric specialization, cognitive differences, and their implications for the design of decision support systems , 1992 .

[30]  Thomas E. Drabek,et al.  The Organizational Context , 1990 .

[31]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[32]  Henri Barki,et al.  Measuring User Participation, User Involvement, and User Attitude , 1994, MIS Q..

[33]  Menachem Monnickendam,et al.  An Assessment of the Utilization of a Computerized Decision Support System for Youth Probation Officers , 2001 .

[34]  William J. Doll,et al.  The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction , 1988, MIS Q..

[35]  Edward J. Garrity,et al.  Information systems success measurement , 1998 .