LiDAR DEM Smoothing and the Preservation of Drainage Features

Fine-resolution Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data often exhibit excessive surface roughness that can hinder the characterization of topographic shape and the modeling of near-surface flow processes. Digital elevation model (DEM) smoothing methods, commonly low-pass filters, are sometimes applied to LiDAR data to subdue the roughness. These techniques can negatively impact the representation of topographic features, most notably drainage features, such as headwater streams. This paper presents the feature-preserving DEM smoothing (FPDEMS) method, which modifies surface normals to smooth the topographic surface in a similar manner to approaches that were originally designed for de-noising three-dimensional (3D) meshes. The FPDEMS method has been optimized for application with raster DEM data. The method was compared with several low-pass filters while using a 0.5-m resolution LiDAR DEM of an agricultural area in southwestern Ontario, Canada. The findings demonstrated that the technique was better at removing roughness, when compared with mean, median, and Gaussian filters, while also preserving sharp breaks-in-slope and retaining the topographic complexity at broader scales. Optimal smoothing occurred with kernel sizes of 11–21 grid cells, threshold angles of 10°–20°, and 3–15 elevation-update iterations. These parameter settings allowed for the effective reduction in roughness and DEM noise and the retention of terrace scarps, channel banks, gullies, and headwater streams.

[1]  Daniel Cohen-Or,et al.  Bilateral mesh denoising , 2003 .

[2]  Youyi Zheng,et al.  IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VISUALIZATION AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS 1 Bilateral Normal Filtering for Mesh Denoising , 2022 .

[3]  John P. Wilson,et al.  DEM resolution dependencies of terrain attributes across a landscape , 2007, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[4]  Yumin Chen,et al.  Comparison of drainage-constrained methods for DEM generalization , 2012, Comput. Geosci..

[5]  Garry R. Willgoose,et al.  On the effect of digital elevation model accuracy on hydrology and geomorphology , 1999 .

[6]  M. Hodgson,et al.  Accuracy of Airborne Lidar-Derived Elevation: Empirical Assessment and Error Budget , 2004 .

[7]  D. Tarboton A new method for the determination of flow directions and upslope areas in grid digital elevation models , 1997 .

[8]  Larry S. Davis,et al.  A new class of edge-preserving smoothing filters , 1987, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[9]  N. Usul,et al.  Effect of map scale and grid size for hydrological modelling , 2004 .

[10]  Frédo Durand,et al.  Non-iterative, feature-preserving mesh smoothing , 2003, ACM Trans. Graph..

[11]  Yumin Chen,et al.  A scale-adaptive DEM for multi-scale terrain analysis , 2013, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[12]  John B. Lindsay,et al.  Whitebox GAT: A case study in geomorphometric analysis , 2016, Comput. Geosci..

[13]  L. Allan James,et al.  Using LiDAR data to map gullies and headwater streams under forest canopy: South Carolina, USA , 2007 .

[14]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Source areas, drainage density, and channel initiation , 1989 .

[15]  Katharina Helming,et al.  Soil roughness and overland flow , 2000 .

[16]  J. Lindsay,et al.  Sensitivity of digital landscapes to artifact depressions in remotely-sensed DEMs , 2005 .

[17]  Ralph R. Martin,et al.  Fast and Effective Feature-Preserving Mesh Denoising , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[18]  Xuefeng Chu,et al.  How does DEM resolution affect microtopographic characteristics, hydrologic connectivity, and modelling of hydrologic processes? , 2016 .

[19]  Tomislav Hengl,et al.  Chapter 4 Preparation of DEMs for Geomorphometric Analysis , 2009 .

[20]  Frédo Durand,et al.  Bilateral Filtering: Theory and Applications , 2009, Found. Trends Comput. Graph. Vis..

[21]  Xianfang Sun,et al.  Despeckling SRTM and other topographic data with a denoising algorithm , 2010 .

[22]  André Fonseca,et al.  What is the effect of LiDAR-derived DEM resolution on large-scale watershed model results? , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[23]  Carlos Henrique Grohmann,et al.  Multiscale Analysis of Topographic Surface Roughness in the Midland Valley, Scotland , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[24]  Roberto Manduchi,et al.  Bilateral filtering for gray and color images , 1998, Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271).

[25]  Douglas A. Miller,et al.  The Use of LiDAR Terrain Data in Characterizing Surface Roughness and Microtopography , 2013 .

[26]  J. Lindsay,et al.  Hyper-scale analysis of surface roughness , 2018 .

[27]  Danny Barash,et al.  A Fundamental Relationship between Bilateral Filtering, Adaptive Smoothing, and the Nonlinear Diffusion Equation , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[28]  Carlos Henrique Grohmann,et al.  Effects of spatial resolution on slope and aspect derivation for regional-scale analysis , 2015, Comput. Geosci..

[29]  Kristof Van Oost,et al.  Rill erosion: Exploring the relationship between experiments, modelling and field observations , 2007 .

[30]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Hill shading and the reflectance map , 1981, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[31]  Helena Mitasova,et al.  Fusion of high-resolution DEMs for water flow modeling , 2017, Open Geospatial Data, Software and Standards.

[32]  R. MacMillan,et al.  Automated analysis and classification of landforms using high-resolution digital elevation data: applications and issues , 2003 .

[33]  Ling Wang,et al.  Spatial statistics of surface roughness change derived from multi-scale digital elevation models , 2011 .

[34]  Emmanuel P. Baltsavias,et al.  A comparison between photogrammetry and laser scanning , 1999 .

[35]  Jingzhong Li,et al.  A DEM generalization by minor valley branch detection and grid filling , 2010 .