In Search of Acceptability Citeria: Database Consistency Requirements and Transaction Correctness properties

Whereas serializability captures database consistency requirements and transaction correctness properties via a single notion, recent research has attempted to come up with correctness criteria that view these two types of requirements indepen- dently. The search for more flexible correctness criteria is partly motivated by the introduction of new transaction models that extend the traditional atomic transaction model. These extensions came about because the atomic transac- tion model in conjunction with serializability is found to be very constraining when applied in advanced applications, such as, design databases, that function in distributed, cooperative, and heterogeneous environments. In this paper, we develop a taxonomy of various correctness criteria that focus on database consistency requirements and transaction correctness properties from the viewpoint of what the different dimensions of these two are. This taxonomy allows us to categorize correctness criteria that have been proposed in the lit- erature. To help in this categorization, we have applied a uniform specification technique, based on ACTA, to express the various criteria. Such a categorization helps shed light on the similarities and differences between different criteria and to place them in perspective.

[1]  Irving L. Traiger,et al.  Granularity of Locks and Degrees of Consistency in a Shared Data Base , 1998, IFIP Working Conference on Modelling in Data Base Management Systems.

[2]  Calton Pu,et al.  Split-Transactions for Open-Ended Activities , 1988, VLDB.

[3]  Andrea H. Skarra Localized correctness specifications for cooperating transactions in an object-oriented database , 1991 .

[4]  Rajeev Rastogi,et al.  Non-serializable executions in heterogeneous distributed database systems , 1991, [1991] Proceedings of the First International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Information Systems.

[5]  Patrick E. O'Neil,et al.  The Escrow transactional method , 1986, TODS.

[6]  Ahmed K. Elmagarmid,et al.  Extending the transaction model to capture more meaning , 1990, SGMD.

[7]  Hector Garcia-Molina,et al.  Modeling long-running activities as nested sagas , 1991 .

[8]  Abraham Silberschatz,et al.  Triggered Real-Time Databases with Consistency Constraints , 1990, VLDB.

[9]  Maurice Herlihy,et al.  Hybrid Concurrency Control for Abstract Data Types , 1991, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[10]  Won Kim,et al.  On Long-Duration CAD Transactions , 1989, Inf. Sci..

[11]  E. B. Moss,et al.  Nested Transactions: An Approach to Reliable Distributed Computing , 1985 .

[12]  Ahmed K. Elmagarmid,et al.  Maintaining Consistency of Interdependent Data in Multidatabase Systems , 1991 .

[13]  Catriel Beeri,et al.  A model for concurrency in nested transactions systems , 1989, JACM.

[14]  Weimin Du,et al.  Quasi Serializability: a Correctness Criterion for Global Concurrency Control in InterBase , 1989, VLDB.

[15]  Mihalis Yannakakis,et al.  Serializability by Locking , 1984, JACM.

[16]  Panos K. Chrysanthis,et al.  A Formalism for Extended Transaction Model , 1991, VLDB.

[17]  Panos K. Chrysanthis,et al.  ACTA: a framework for specifying and reasoning about transaction structure and behavior , 1990, SIGMOD '90.

[18]  Marc H. Graham,et al.  Abstraction in recovery management , 1986, SIGMOD '86.

[19]  Hector Garcia-Molina,et al.  Using semantic knowledge for transaction processing in a distributed database , 1983, TODS.

[20]  Panos K. Chrysanthis,et al.  ACTA: The SAGA Continues , 1992, Database Transaction Models for Advanced Applications.

[21]  Maurice Herlihy,et al.  Axioms for concurrent objects , 1987, POPL '87.

[22]  Wen-Chi Hou,et al.  Processing aggregate relational queries with hard time constraints , 1989, SIGMOD '89.

[23]  Calton Pu,et al.  Replica control in distributed systems: as asynchronous approach , 1991, SIGMOD '91.

[24]  Irving L. Traiger,et al.  The notions of consistency and predicate locks in a database system , 1976, CACM.

[25]  Lui Sha Modular concurrency control and failure recovery--consistency, correctness and optimality (transaction, database, distributed, operating systems) , 1985 .

[26]  Ahmed K. Elmagarmid,et al.  Transaction Models for Advanced Database Applications , 1991 .

[27]  Sandra Heiler,et al.  Distributed Object Management , 1992, Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst..

[28]  Nancy A. Lynch,et al.  Multilevel atomicity—a new correctness criterion for database concurrency control , 1983, TODS.

[29]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Management of interdependent data: specifying dependency and consistency requirements , 1990, [1990] Proceedings. Workshop on the Management of Replicated Data.

[30]  Umeshwar Dayal,et al.  Organizing long-running activities with triggers and transactions , 1990, SIGMOD '90.

[31]  B. R. Badrinath,et al.  Performance evaluation of semantics-based multilevel concurrency control protocols , 1990, SIGMOD '90.

[32]  Abraham Silberschatz,et al.  On Rigorous Transaction Scheduling , 1991, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[33]  Panos K. Chrysanthis,et al.  Extracting concurrency from objects: a methodology , 1991, SIGMOD '91.