Assessing participatory practices in community-based natural resource management: experiences in community engagement from southern Africa.

The emphasis on participatory environmental management within international development has started to overcome critiques of traditional exclusionary environmental policy, aligning with shifts towards decentralisation and community empowerment. However, questions are raised regarding the extent to which participation in project design and implementation is meaningful and really engages communities in the process. Calls have been made for further local-level (project and community-scale) research to identify practices that can increase the likelihood of meaningful community engagement within externally initiated projects. This paper presents data from three community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) project case studies from southern Africa, which promote Joint Forest Management (JFM), tree planting for carbon and conservation agriculture. Data collection was carried out through semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders, community-level meetings, focus groups and interviews. We find that an important first step for a meaningful community engagement process is to define 'community' in an open and participatory manner. Two-way communication at all stages of the community engagement process is shown to be critical, and charismatic leadership based on mutual respect and clarity of roles and responsibilities is vital to improve the likelihood of participants developing understanding of project aims and philosophy. This can lead to successful project outcomes through community ownership of the project goals and empowerment in project implementation. Specific engagement methods are found to be less important than the contextual and environmental factors associated with each project, but consideration should be given to identifying appropriate methods to ensure community representation. Our findings extend current thinking on the evaluation of participation by making explicit links between the community engagement process and project outcomes, and by identifying further criteria that can be considered in process and outcome-based evaluations. We highlight good practices for future CBNRM projects which can be used by project designers and initiators to further the likelihood of successful project outcomes.

[1]  W. Adams,et al.  Back to the Barriers? Changing Narratives in Biodiversity Conservation , 2005 .

[2]  Kristen Purcell,et al.  Public Participation and the Environment: Do We Know What Works? , 1999 .

[3]  Bronwyn L Horsey,et al.  Developing and applying a framework to evaluate participatory research for sustainability , 2007 .

[4]  A. Angelsen,et al.  Forest dependence and participation in CPR management: empirical evidence from forest co-management in Malawi , 2007 .

[5]  G. Rowe,et al.  Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda , 2004 .

[6]  K. Schreckenberg,et al.  Equity in Community Forestry: Insights from North and South , 2009 .

[7]  Arun Agrawal,et al.  Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation , 2011 .

[8]  C. Prell,et al.  Unpacking “Participation” in the Adaptive Management of Social–ecological Systems: a Critical Review , 2006 .

[9]  T. Baker,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Ecosystem Services, Governance and Stakeholder Participation Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+): Transaction Costs of Six Peruvian Projects , 2013 .

[10]  Ioan Fazey,et al.  Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management. , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[11]  Andrew J. Dougill,et al.  Community fencing in open rangelands: a case study of community self-empowerment in Eastern Namibia. , 2002 .

[12]  T. Measham,et al.  Success Factors for Community-Based Natural Resource Management (CBNRM): Lessons from Kenya and Australia , 2013, Environmental Management.

[13]  M. Reed.  Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review , 2008 .

[14]  K. Waylen,et al.  How national context, project design, and local community characteristics influence success in community-based conservation projects , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Daniel J. Fiorino.  Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms , 1990 .

[16]  Thomas Webler,et al.  “Right” Discourse in Citizen Participation: An Evaluative Yardstick , 1995 .

[17]  Péter Bálint,et al.  The decline of a model community-based conservation project: Governance, capacity, and devolution in Mahenye, Zimbabwe , 2006 .

[18]  G. Rowe,et al.  Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation , 2000 .

[19]  T. Webler,et al.  Fairness and competence in citizen participation : evaluating models for environmental discourse , 1995 .

[20]  Ilan Kapoor,et al.  Towards participatory environmental management? , 2001, Journal of environmental management.

[21]  M. S. Reed,et al.  Participatory Evaluation of Monitoring and Modeling of Sustainable Land Management Technologies in Areas Prone to Land Degradation , 2014, Environmental Management.

[22]  Dale J. Blahna,et al.  Public involvement in resource planning: Toward bridging the gap between policy and implementation , 1989 .

[23]  M. Phiri,et al.  Local community perception of joint forest management and its implications for forest condition: the case of Dambwa Forest Reserve in southern Zambia , 2012 .

[24]  L. Stringer,et al.  Challenges and opportunities for carbon management in Malawi and Zambia , 2012 .

[25]  C. Palmer,et al.  REDD+ and rural livelihoods , 2012 .

[26]  L. Stringer,et al.  Participation in environmental conservation and protected area management in Romania: A review of three case studies , 2013, Environmental Conservation.

[27]  Tony Bovaird,et al.  Public–Private Partnerships: from Contested Concepts to Prevalent Practice , 2004 .

[28]  Peter A Singer,et al.  Grand Challenges in Global Health: Community Engagement in Research in Developing Countries , 2007, PLoS medicine.

[29]  J. Lund,et al.  Curse or blessing? Local elites in Joint Forest Management in India’s Shiwaliks , 2010 .

[30]  L. Stringer,et al.  Lessons from community-based payment for ecosystem service schemes: from forests to rangelands , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  I. Fazey,et al.  Hearing but Not Listening? A Participatory Assessment of Public Participation in Planning , 2011 .

[32]  David W. Smith,et al.  Geographies of Development , 1999 .

[33]  J. Paavola,et al.  Can REDD+ reconcile local priorities and needs with global mitigation benefits? Lessons from angai forest, Tanzania , 2012 .

[34]  Seth Tuler,et al.  Four Perspectives on Public Participation Process in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making: Combined Results from 10 Case Studies , 2006 .

[35]  P. Blaikie,et al.  Community-based natural resource management in Malawi and Botswana by , 2003 .

[36]  M. Reed,et al.  Implementing the UNCCD: Participatory challenges , 2007 .

[37]  Tyhra Carolyn Kumasi,et al.  Community engagement in the sustainable management of rivers: Barekese catchment, Kumasi, Ghana , 2010 .

[38]  Andrew J. Dougill,et al.  Community fencing in open rangelands: self‐empowerment in Eastern Namibia , 2001 .

[39]  J. Newig,et al.  Environmental governance: participatory, multi-level - and effective? , 2009 .

[40]  Resilient participation. Saving the Human Project? , 2014 .

[41]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Enchantment and Disenchantment: The Role of Community in Natural Resource Conservation , 1999 .

[42]  John A. Hall,et al.  Demonstration as a Means to Translate Conservation Science into Practice , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[43]  David Richards,et al.  Elite Interviewing: Approaches and Pitfalls , 1996 .

[44]  David Hulme,et al.  Communities, wildlife and the 'new conservation' in Africa , 1999 .