Less effortful thinking leads to more social networking? The associations between the use of social network sites and personality traits

Social network sites (SNS) have become an important social milieu that enables interpersonal communication by allowing users to share and create information. This study explored the associations between SNS use and personality traits, i.e., need for cognition (NFC) and information and communication technology (ICT) innovativeness. The findings showed that the SNS use had a negative association with NFC and a positive association with ICT innovativeness. Specifically, people who were more likely to engage in effortful thinking used SNS less often, and those who were high in ICT innovativeness used SNS more often. Meanwhile, those who spent more time on SNS were more likely to be multitaskers. Additionally, those who spent more time on SNS also spent more Internet time in general, more online time for study/work and more time in surfing the Web with no specific purpose. This study, which could be a first look at the link between social networking and our thinking, provides evidence for the associations between social media use and personality traits.

[1]  Eileen Wood,et al.  All about me: Disclosure in online social networking profiles: The case of FACEBOOK , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[2]  E. Stotland,et al.  An experimental investigation of need for cognition. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[3]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[4]  James E. Katz,et al.  Handbook of Mobile Communication Studies , 2008 .

[5]  Yair Amichai-Hamburger,et al.  The effects of need for cognition on Internet use , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  Teresa Correa,et al.  Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users' personality and social media use , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[7]  Christopher L. Asplund,et al.  Isolation of a Central Bottleneck of Information Processing with Time-Resolved fMRI , 2006, Neuron.

[8]  Judith Donath,et al.  Public Displays of Connection , 2004 .

[9]  Michael Gilding,et al.  ‘I’ve Never Clicked this Much with Anyone in My Life’: Trust and Hyperpersonal Communication in Online Friendships , 2004, New Media Soc..

[10]  Curtis P. Haugtvedt,et al.  Need for Cognition and Advertising: Understanding the Role of Personality Variables in Consumer Behavior , 1992 .

[11]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[12]  L. Tidwell,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication Effects on Disclosure, Impressions, and Interpersonal Evaluations: Getting to Know One Another a Bit at a Time , 2002 .

[13]  Paul M. Haridakis,et al.  The influence of dispositions and Internet motivation on online communication satisfaction and relationship closeness , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[14]  Larry D. Rosen,et al.  The impact of emotionality and self-disclosure on online dating versus traditional dating , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  J. M. Digman.  PERSONALITY STRUCTURE: EMERGENCE OF THE FIVE-FACTOR MODEL , 1990 .

[16]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[17]  Se-Hoon Jeong,et al.  Predictors of Multitasking with Media: Media Factors and Audience Factors , 2007 .

[18]  C. F. Kao,et al.  The efficient assessment of need for cognition. , 1984, Journal of personality assessment.

[19]  Yair Amichai-Hamburger.  Internet Minimal Group Paradigm , 2005, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[20]  D. Midgley,et al.  Innovativeness: The Concept and Its Measurement , 1978 .

[21]  Vanessa Vega,et al.  Multitasking Effects on Visual Working Memory, Working Memory and Executive Control , 2008 .

[22]  June Lu,et al.  Personal innovativeness, social influences and adoption of wireless Internet services via mobile technology , 2005, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Hugo Liu,et al.  Social Network Profiles as Taste Performances , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[24]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  DISPOSITIONAL DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE MOTIVATION : THE LIFE AND TIMES OF INDIVIDUALS VARYING IN NEED FOR COGNITION , 1996 .

[25]  Bas Verplanken,et al.  Need for Cognition and External Information Search: Responses to Time Pressure during Decision-Making , 1993 .

[26]  Y. Hamburger,et al.  The relationship between extraversion and neuroticism and the different uses of the Internet. , 2000 .

[27]  B. Verplanken,et al.  Need for cognition and external information search effort , 1992 .

[28]  W. Bearden,et al.  Consumer Innovativeness and the Adoption Process , 1995 .

[29]  Yair Amichai-Hamburger,et al.  Social network use and personality , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[30]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Intentions to Use Information Technologies: An Integrative Model , 2006, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[31]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches , 1981 .

[32]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Relationship formation on the Internet: What's the big attraction? , 2002 .

[33]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[34]  E. Hirschman.  Innovativeness, Novelty Seeking, and Consumer Creativity , 1980 .

[35]  Donald W. Fiske,et al.  Measuring the concepts of personality , 1971 .

[36]  Craig Ross,et al.  Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[37]  Yair Amichai-Hamburger,et al.  The effects of Need for Cognition on Internet use revisited , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[38]  Steve Jones,et al.  U.S. College Students' Internet Use: Race, Gender and Digital Divides , 2009, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[39]  Yair Amichai-Hamburger,et al.  Internet and personality , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[40]  Naomi S. Baron.  Adjusting the volume: technology and multitasking in discourse control , 2016 .

[41]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[42]  Zizi Papacharissi,et al.  The virtual geographies of social networks: a comparative analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn and ASmallWorld , 2009, New Media Soc..

[43]  Aaron Smith,et al.  Social Media & Mobile Internet Use among Teens and Young Adults. Millennials. , 2010 .

[44]  John Raacke,et al.  MySpace and Facebook: Applying the Uses and Gratifications Theory to Exploring Friend-Networking Sites , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[45]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement , 1983 .

[46]  Francesca Valsesia.  ASSOCIATION FOR CONSUMER RESEARCH , 2015 .

[47]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  Time Flies When You're Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs About Information Technology Usage , 2000, MIS Q..

[48]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion. , 1983 .

[49]  D. Meyer,et al.  Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[50]  Jenny Sundén,et al.  Material Virtualities: Approaching Online Textual Embodiment , 2003 .

[51]  Rod A. Martin,et al.  The Psychology of Humor: An Integrative Approach , 2006 .

[52]  R. McCrae,et al.  An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. , 1992, Journal of personality.

[53]  Michael J. Sherrard,et al.  The role of sensation seeking and need for cognition on web-site evaluations : a resource-matching perspective , 2005 .

[54]  Patti M. Valkenburg,et al.  Friend Networking Sites and Their Relationship to Adolescents' Well-Being and Social Self-Esteem , 2006, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[55]  D. Midgley,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Product Form Innovation: The Interaction between Predispositions and Social Messages , 1993 .

[56]  M. Just,et al.  Interdependence of Nonoverlapping Cortical Systems in Dual Cognitive Tasks , 2001, NeuroImage.