Voluntary modification of automatic arm movements evoked by motion of a visual target

Abstract. We have investigated whether the processes underlying the visually evoked, automatic adjustments to a reach are: (1) modifiable by the subject's intention, and (2) available to initiate movement of a stationary arm. Unpredictable movement of a target (80 m/s through 10 cm, left or right in a third of trials) either evoked a mid-flight adjustment of a reaching movement or else acted as a trigger to start an arm movement. Subjects were instructed to respond as rapidly as possible by moving their finger either in the same or in the opposite direction to the target. The target shift evoked an early (125–160 ms) and/or a later (>160 ms) class of response in the reaching arm. The early response was highly automatic in that it could not be reversed (move opposite) by the subjects' intention. However, the subjects' intention did influence the frequency of occurrence and the size of this early response. The later response was totally modifiable in that it changed direction according to the subjects' intention. Similar classes of response were observed in stationary limbs, but the early, more automatic response was substantially weaker than that elicited during a reach. Two possible mechanisms are proposed to explain these results. The first is a dual-pathway model, which assumes that the two response classes are each generated by separate visuo-motor processes with different properties. The second model assumes both responses are generated by a single visuo-motor mechanism that is under the control of a higher, attentional process.

[1]  John W. Scott,et al.  Selected Writings of John Hughlings Jackson , 1959 .

[2]  M. Posner,et al.  Processing of visual feedback in rapid movements. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  C. I. Howarth,et al.  Movement Control in a Repetitive Motor Task , 1970, Nature.

[4]  John L. Bradshaw,et al.  Laterality effects and choice reaction time in a unimanual two-finger task , 1970 .

[5]  G Rizzolatti,et al.  Simple reaction times of ipsilateral and contralateral hand to lateralized visual stimuli. , 1971, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[6]  J. Andreassi,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetries in the visual cortical evoked potential as a function of stimulus location. , 1975, Psychophysiology.

[7]  C. Marsden,et al.  Stretch reflex and servo action in a variety of human muscles. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Spatial compatibility and anatomical factors in simple and choice reaction time , 1977, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  L. Carlton Processing visual feedback information for movement control. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  J. Soechting,et al.  Modification of trajectory of a pointing movement in response to a change in target location. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  Lorraine G. Kisselburgh,et al.  Rapid visual feedback processing in single-aiming movements. , 1983, Journal of motor behavior.

[12]  B. Alstermark,et al.  Visually guided switching of forelimb target reaching in cats. , 1984, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[13]  C. Prablanc,et al.  Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement , 1986, Nature.

[14]  B. Alstermark,et al.  Effect of different spinal cord lesions on visually guided switching of target-reaching in cats , 1987, Neuroscience Research.

[15]  V E Amassian,et al.  Comparison of human transcallosal responses evoked by magnetic coil and electrical stimulation. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Measuring time to awareness , 1991, Neuroreport.

[17]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Temporal dissociation of motor responses and subjective awareness. A study in normal subjects. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[18]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  B. Day,et al.  Interhemispheric inhibition of the human motor cortex. , 1992, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  C. Prablanc,et al.  Automatic control during hand reaching at undetected two-dimensional target displacements. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  W. Werner,et al.  Neurons in the Primate Superior Colliculus are Active Before and During Arm Movements to Visual Targets , 1993, The European journal of neuroscience.

[22]  Bl Day,et al.  EARLY ADJUSTMENTS OF HUMAN ARM MOVEMENTS WHEN REACHING FOR A TARGET THAT MOVES , 1994 .

[23]  S P Wise,et al.  The premotor cortex and nonstandard sensorimotor mapping. , 1996, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[24]  R. Passingham,et al.  The left parietal cortex and motor attention , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  S P Tipper,et al.  Action-based mechanisms of attention. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[26]  J. Jackson,et al.  Evolution and Dissolution of the Nervous System , 1998 .

[27]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  The coupling of arm and finger movements during prehension , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  M. Goodale,et al.  Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.