Malapposition of Graft-host Interface after Keratoplasty: an Optical Coherence Tomography Study

Background: Previous studies of internal graft-host malappositions have not dealt with the precise ways in which each wound malapposition affected post-keratoplasty visual outcomes. In this study, reviewing our postsurgical keratoconic patients using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) to evaluate the correlation between characteristics of the graft-host interface (GHI) and visual outcomes was aimed. Methods: Correlations between characteristics of GHI and the postsurgical visual outcomes, including logarithm of minimum angle of resolution best-corrected visual acuity (logMAR BCVA), spherical equivalent diopter (SE), diopter of spherical power (DS), diopter of cylindrical power (DC), and keratometric astigmatism, were evaluated of 45 eyes (patients). Results: The graft-host touch (GHT) varied with different alignment patterns. LogMAR BCVA correlated positively with GHT (r=0.32, P=0.030) and junctional graft thickness (Tg) (r=0.49, P=0.001). SE had positive correlation with frequency of step [F (step)] (r=0.46, P=0.001), graft step [F (graft step)] (r=0.40, P=0.028), total prevalence of malapposition proportion (Pm) (r=0.35, P=0.018), size of malapposition (Sm) (r=0.31, P=0.037), Tg (r=0.03, P=0.022), disparity between junctional graft and host thickness (|Tg-Th|) (r=0.40, P=0.007), and correlated negatively with GHT (r=-0.34, P=0.021). Similar results were acquired in DS. Keratometric astigmatism was found to correlate positively with Sm (r=0.30, P=0.047). Conclusion: In keratoconic eyes, corneal keratometric astigmatism increased by 0.017 with Sm. LogMAR BCVA increased by 0.001 with both GHT and Tg. Investigation of the visions for keratoconus patients. Our study might have potential reference value for future technological promotion.

[1]  E. Yildiz,et al.  Vision-Related Quality of Life Before and After Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty , 2017, Eye & contact lens.

[2]  U. D. Uzunel,et al.  Does the Stage of Keratoconus Affect Optical Coherence Tomography Measurements? , 2017, Seminars in ophthalmology.

[3]  M. Nanavaty,et al.  Systematic review comparing penetrating keratoplasty and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for management of keratoconus. , 2017, Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association.

[4]  R. Dhasmana,et al.  Monitoring the appositions of posterior graft–host junctions with anterior segment optical coherence tomogram after penetrating keratoplasty , 2017, International Ophthalmology.

[5]  C. McGhee,et al.  Incidence, severity and outcomes of traumatic wound dehiscence following penetrating and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty , 2016, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[6]  Inês Laíns,et al.  Irregular Astigmatism After Corneal Transplantation—Efficacy and Safety of Topography-Guided Treatment , 2016, Cornea.

[7]  R. Karadag,et al.  Arcuate keratotomy on post-keratoplasty astigmatism is unpredictable and frequently needs repeat procedures to increase its success rate , 2015, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[8]  S. Feizi,et al.  Factors Predicting Refractive Outcomes After Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty in Keratoconus. , 2015, American journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  Ting Huang,et al.  Comparison of refractive outcomes in three corneal transplantation techniques for keratoconus , 2015, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[10]  M. Sung,et al.  Evaluation of graft–host interface after penetrating keratoplasty using anterior segment optical coherence tomography , 2014, Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology.

[11]  W. Wee,et al.  Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Same-size Grafting between Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty for Keratoconus , 2013, Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO.

[12]  N. Yenerel,et al.  The complementary benefit of anterior segment optical coherence tomography in penetrating keratoplasty , 2013, Clinical ophthalmology.

[13]  Mohammad Zare,et al.  Current Approaches for Management of Postpenetrating Keratoplasty Astigmatism , 2011, Journal of ophthalmology.

[14]  D. Piñero,et al.  Comparison of astigmatic keratotomy results in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus. , 2011, American journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  V. Jhanji,et al.  Evaluation of Posterior Wound Profile After Penetrating Keratoplasty Using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography , 2011, Cornea.

[16]  I. Bahar,et al.  Corneal wound malapposition after penetrating keratoplasty: an optical coherence tomography study , 2008, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[17]  Tin Aung,et al.  Corneal imaging with anterior segment optical coherence tomography for lamellar keratoplasty procedures. , 2008, American journal of ophthalmology.

[18]  D. Lam,et al.  Repeatability and reproducibility of pachymetric mapping with Visante anterior segment-optical coherence tomography. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[19]  L. Girard Corneal compression sutures for the reduction of astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. , 1989, American journal of ophthalmology.

[20]  G. Lang,et al.  Clinicopathologic studies of keratoplasty eyes obtained post mortem. , 1986, American journal of ophthalmology.