Post-copulatory aggression toward their mates by males of the rove beetle Leistotrophus versicolor (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)

SummaryRove beetles (Leistotrophus versicolor) forage and mate at dung and carrion in the riparian forest of northwestern Costa Rica. After copulating, males often launch a post-copulatory attack against their recent partner. We test four hypotheses on the adaptive value of male behavior: (1) The sperm competition hypothesis proposes that the behavior may be the functional equivalent of mate-guarding, (2) the sperm-transfer signal hypothesis states that males bite their mates after copulating to signal that they have successfully passed sperm, (3) the feeding competition hypothesis argues that male aggression toward mates occurs to drive away competitors for fly prey, and (4) the redirected aggression hypothesis is that male attacks after mating occur when threatened males redirect their aggression onto their partners. Only the sperm competition hypothesis withstands testing. As required by this hypothesis, females are usually receptive while at dung, and will mate with more than one male in a morning. In addition, males are more likely to attack a mate when they have fought earlier in the day with other males, an indicator of the presence of rival males and the risk of sperm competition. Contrary to the sperm-transfer signal hypothesis (2), biting of mates does not occur after nearly 40% of all copulations; it seems unlikely that mating males so often fail to transfer sperm. Whether males have fed or not prior to mating has no effect on the probability of post-copulatory attack, a result that contradicts the food competition hypothesis (3). Finally, the occurrence of attacks by males on females in the absence of an immediate threat from a rival argues against the redirected aggression hypothesis (4).

[1]  D. Cowan Sexual behavior of eumenid wasps (Hymenoptera: Eumenidae) , 1986 .

[2]  J. Alcock,et al.  A Comparative Study of the Mating Systems of Australian Eumenid Wasps (Hymenoptera) , 1980 .

[3]  M. Wade,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF INSECT MATING SYSTEMS. , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[4]  J. Alcock,et al.  The Significance of Post–insemination Display by Male Centris pallida (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae) , 1985 .

[5]  J. Ashe Egg chamber production, egg protection and clutch size among fungivorus beetles of the genus Eumicrota (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) and their evolutionary implications , 1987 .

[6]  G. Schaller The Serengeti Lion: A Study of Predator-Prey Relations , 1972 .

[7]  M. Metzler,et al.  Defensive and pheromonal secretion of the tergal gland of Aleochara curtula , 1982, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[8]  G. Parker,et al.  SPERM COMPETITION AND ITS EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES IN THE INSECTS , 1970 .

[9]  K. Peschke The female sex pheromone of the staphylinid beetle, Aleochara curtula , 1978 .

[10]  M. Moynihan,et al.  Some Comments On Conflict and Thwarting in Animals , 1954 .

[11]  C. Starr,et al.  Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems , 1984 .

[12]  W. Balduf The Bionomics Of Entomophagous Coleoptera , 1935 .

[13]  K. Peschke Tactile orientation by mating males of the staphylinid beetle, Aleochara curtula, relative to the setal fields of the female , 1979 .

[14]  K. Peschke Immature males of Aleochara curtula avoid intrasexual aggressions by producing the female sex pheromone , 1985, Naturwissenschaften.

[15]  R. Seyfarth,et al.  Social relationships and social cognition in nonhuman primates. , 1986, Science.