Relationship between muscle coordination and racket mass during forehand drive in tennis

This study aimed at investigating the relationship between the trunk and upper limb muscle coordination and mass of the tennis racket during forehand drive. A total of 15 male tennis players performed seven series of ten crosscourt forehand drives, both with their personal racket and six rackets with increased mass ranging from 6 to 16% (step = 2%) of their personal racket mass. The electromyographic (EMG) activity was recorded from nine trunk and upper limb muscles. The onset before impact and EMGrms values of the bursts were individually calculated. Results showed that the ball speed and the muscle activation temporal sequences were similar, whatever the increase in racket mass. Interestingly, in all participants, the activation level of the pectoralis major, latissimus dorsi and biceps brachii decreased when the racket mass increased, while the variations in the anterior deltoid activation level were correlated to the individual personal racket mass. These findings strongly suggest that the study of muscle activity during tennis practice should be considered as a complementary technique to determine a better adequacy of the racket characteristics to those of the player.

[1]  R Cross,et al.  Player sensitivity to changes in string tension in a tennis racket. , 2003, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[2]  Rod Cross Physics of overarm throwing , 2004 .

[3]  Bruce Elliott,et al.  A Biomechanical Comparison of the Multisegment and Single Unit Topspin Forehand Drives in Tennis , 1989 .

[4]  K Takahashi,et al.  The role of upper limb segment rotations in the development of spin in the tennis forehand. , 1996, Australian journal of science and medicine in sport.

[5]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[6]  M. Marques Strength Training in Adult Elite Tennis Players , 2005 .

[7]  R. Marx,et al.  Overuse injuries of the upper extremity in tennis players. , 2001, Clinics in sports medicine.

[8]  H. Brody,et al.  Player sensitivity to the moments of inertia of a tennis racket , 2000 .

[9]  B. Freriks,et al.  Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. , 2000, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[10]  R. Hetzler,et al.  Effects of Weighted Bat Implement Training on Bat Swing Velocity , 1995 .

[11]  Rod Cross Customising a tennis racket by adding weights , 2001 .

[12]  Chester Sergo,et al.  Training Methods Using Various Weighted Bats and the Effects on Bat Velocity , 1993 .

[13]  R. Cross The bounce of a ball , 1999 .

[14]  Sean R. Mitchell,et al.  Head speed vs. racket inertia in the tennis serve , 2000 .

[15]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[16]  R. Cross,et al.  Effects of swing-weight on swing speed and racket power , 2006, Journal of sports sciences.

[17]  Daniel J. Antonelli,et al.  An electromyographic analysis of shoulder function in tennis players , 1988, The American journal of sports medicine.

[18]  Robert Shapiro,et al.  Muscle activation in coupled scapulohumeral motions in the high performance tennis serve , 2007, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[19]  Glenn S. Fleisig,et al.  Effects of Throwing Overweight and Underweight Baseballs on Throwing Velocity and Accuracy , 2000, Sports medicine.