The KIDROP model of combining strategies for providing retinopathy of prematurity screening in underserved areas in India using wide-field imaging, tele-medicine, non-physician graders and smart phone reporting

Aim: To report the Karnataka Internet Assisted Diagnosis of Retinopathy of Prematurity (KIDROP) program for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening in underserved rural areas using an indigenously developed tele-ROP model. Materials and Methods: KIDROP currently provides ROP screening and treatment services in three zones and 81 neonatal units in Karnataka, India. Technicians were trained to use a portable Retcam Shuttle (Clarity, USA) and validated against ROP experts performing indirect ophthalmoscopy. An indigenously developed 20-point score (STAT score) graded their ability (Level I to III) to image and decide follow-up based on a three-way algorithm. Images were also uploaded on a secure tele-ROP platform and accessed and reported by remote experts on their smart phones (iPhone, Apple). Results: 6339 imaging sessions of 1601 infants were analyzed. A level III technician agreed with 94.3% of all expert decisions. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for treatment grade disease were 95.7, 93.2, 81.5 and 98.6 respectively. The kappa for technicians to decide discharge of babies was 0.94 (P < 0.001). Only 0.4% of infants needing treatment were missed. The kappa agreement of experts reporting on the iPhone vs Retcam for treatment requiring and mild ROP were 0.96 and 0.94 (P < 0.001) respectively. Conclusions: This is the first and largest real-world program to employ accredited non-physicians to grade and report ROP. The KIDROP tele-ROP model demonstrates that ROP services can be delivered to the outreach despite lack of specialists and may be useful in other middle-income countries with similar demographics.

[1]  S. Jawaid The Global Action Report on Preterm Birth , 2012 .

[2]  R. A. Petersen,et al.  RetCam imaging for retinopathy of prematurity screening. , 2006, Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.

[3]  Amod Gupta,et al.  Demographic Profile of Infants with Stage 5 Retinopathy of Prematurity in North India: Implications for Screening , 2011, Ophthalmic epidemiology.

[4]  J. Flynn,et al.  Screening for retinopathy of prematurity employing the retcam 120: sensitivity and specificity. , 2001, Archives of ophthalmology.

[5]  Justin Starren,et al.  Telemedical diagnosis of retinopathy of prematurity intraphysician agreement between ophthalmoscopic examination and image-based interpretation. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[6]  Clare M. Wilson,et al.  Telemedicine screening for retinopathy of prematurity in developing countries using digital retinal images: a feasibility project. , 2008, Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.

[7]  Justin Starren,et al.  Telemedicine for retinopathy of prematurity diagnosis: evaluation and challenges. , 2009, Survey of ophthalmology.

[8]  A. Vinekar,et al.  Retinopathy of prematurity in Asian Indian babies weighing greater than 1250 grams at birth: Ten year data from a tertiary care center in a developing country , 2007, Indian journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  A Gupta,et al.  The incidence of retinopathy of prematurity in a neonatal care unit. , 1995, Indian journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  A. Vinekar,et al.  National Neonatology Foundation's Evidence Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Retinopathy of Prematurity, NNF India, Guidelines , 2010 .

[11]  Justin Starren,et al.  Accuracy and reliability of remote retinopathy of prematurity diagnosis. , 2006, Archives of ophthalmology.

[12]  William J Feuer,et al.  Telephotoscreening to detect retinopathy of prematurity: preliminary study of the optimum time to employ digital fundus camera imaging to detect ROP. , 2002, Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.

[13]  M. Trese,et al.  Evolution of retinal detachment in posterior retinopathy of prematurity: impact on treatment approach. , 2008, American journal of ophthalmology.

[14]  V Asha,et al.  Retinopathy of prematurity: a study. , 1995, Indian journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  E. Lad,et al.  Stanford University Network for Diagnosis of Retinopathy of Prematurity (SUNDROP): 12-month experience with telemedicine screening , 2008, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[16]  G. Quinn,et al.  Characteristics of Infants With Severe Retinopathy of Prematurity in Countries With Low, Moderate, and High Levels of Development: Implications for Screening Programs , 2005, Pediatrics.

[17]  Justin Starren,et al.  Telemedical retinopathy of prematurity diagnosis: accuracy, reliability, and image quality. , 2007, Archives of ophthalmology.

[18]  L. Gopal,et al.  Programme planning and screening strategy in retinopathy of prematurity. , 2003, Indian journal of ophthalmology.

[19]  A. Filouš,et al.  [Retinopathy of prematurity]. , 1998, Ceska a slovenska oftalmologie : casopis Ceske oftalmologicke spolecnosti a Slovenske oftalmologicke spolecnosti.

[20]  Anand Vinekar,et al.  Retinopathy of Prematurity in a Rural Neonatal Intensive Care Unit in South India—A Prospective Study , 2012, The Indian Journal of Pediatrics.

[21]  Allen Foster,et al.  Retinopathy of prematurity in middle-income countries , 1997, The Lancet.

[22]  V. Narendran,et al.  Screening for retinopathy of prematurity--a comparison between binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy and RetCam 120. , 2006, Indian journal of ophthalmology.

[23]  C. Gilbert,et al.  A Novel, Low-Cost Method of Enrolling Infants at Risk for Retinopathy of Prematurity in Centers with No Screening Program: The REDROP Study , 2012, Ophthalmic epidemiology.

[24]  S D Schwartz,et al.  Telemedical evaluation and management of retinopathy of prematurity using a fiberoptic digital fundus camera. , 2000, Ophthalmology.

[25]  M. Trese What is the real gold standard for ROP screening? , 2008, Retina.

[26]  J Starren,et al.  Remote image based retinopathy of prematurity diagnosis: a receiver operating characteristic analysis of accuracy , 2006, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[27]  Penny Jennett,et al.  Telemedicine approach to screening for severe retinopathy of prematurity: a pilot study. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[28]  G. Saleh,et al.  Development of a new valid, reliable, and internationally applicable assessment tool of residents' competence in ophthalmic surgery (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis). , 2013, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[29]  M. Trese,et al.  THE PHOTOGRAPHIC SCREENING FOR RETINOPATHY OF PREMATURITY STUDY (PHOTO-ROP): Study Design and Baseline Characteristics of Enrolled Patients , 2006, Retina.

[30]  S. Jalali,et al.  Outcomes of a protocol-based management for zone 1 retinopathy of prematurity: the Indian Twin Cities ROP Screening Program report number 2. , 2011, American journal of ophthalmology.

[31]  W. Tasman,et al.  Revised indications for the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity: results of the early treatment for retinopathy of prematurity randomized trial. , 2004, Archives of ophthalmology.

[32]  A. Vinekar,et al.  Laser treatment for retinopathy of prematurity through the incubator wall. , 2008, Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging : the official journal of the International Society for Imaging in the Eye.

[33]  Anand Vinekar,et al.  IT‐enabled innovation to prevent infant blindness in rural India: the KIDROP experience , 2011 .