The Developmental Effect of Concurrent Cognitive and Locomotor Skills: Time-Sharing from a Dynamical Perspective.

A dynamical systems perspective on neuromuscular behavior was used to predict the effect of concurrent verbal cognition on locomotor skills. Fundamental to this perspective is the distinction between coordination (collective) variables which define the movement's pattern and control variables which specify the overall parameters of the movement (e.g., velocity). Only the latter were predicted to show interference in the dual-task situation. Female subjects ranging from 2.5 years to adults were filmed while running and galloping both with and without concurrent vocal and nonvocal tasks. Cinematographic analysis revealed no interference on the coordination variables across age but some interference on the control variables which increased in the younger age groups. The younger children had problems with initiating two neuromuscular tasks simultaneously but once initiated the coordination was unaffected. The results suggest that the coordination of a gait requires less attention than the setting of control parameters and that the former is in place at an early age

[1]  S. Grillner Locomotion in vertebrates: central mechanisms and reflex interaction. , 1975, Physiological reviews.

[2]  Doreen Kimura,et al.  Intrahemispheric interaction between speaking and sequential manual activity , 1976, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  H. Haken,et al.  Phase-locked modes, phase transitions and component oscillators in biological motion , 1987 .

[4]  N. A. Bernshteĭn The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1967 .

[5]  Betty Tuller,et al.  A “Dynamic Pattern” Perspective on the Control and Coordination of Movement , 1983 .

[6]  M. Kinsbourne,et al.  Ontogeny of cerebral dominance: Evidence from time-sharing asymmetry in children. , 1978 .

[7]  Lateralized interference of repetitive finger tapping: Influence of familial handedness, cognitive load and verbal production , 1983, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  H. Chipuer,et al.  Concurrent performance of rhythmically compatible or incompatible vocal and manual tasks: Evidence for two sources of interference in verbal-manual timesharing , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  J. Kelso,et al.  Converging evidence in support of common dynamical principles for speech and movement coordination. , 1984, The American journal of physiology.

[10]  C. Gallistel The organization of action , 1980 .

[11]  M. Kinsbourne,et al.  Asymmetry of verbal-manual time sharing in children: A follow-up study , 1980, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  B. Ulrich,et al.  Development of stepping patterns in human infants: a dynamical systems perspective. , 1989, Journal of motor behavior.

[13]  P. McLeod A Dual Task Response Modality Effect: Support for Multiprocessor Models of Attention , 1977 .

[14]  L. Birch Baseline Differences, Attention, and Age Differences in Time-Sharing Performance. , 1978 .

[15]  J Whitall,et al.  A developmental study of the interlimb coordination in running and galloping. , 1989, Journal of motor behavior.

[16]  K. Harris,et al.  Stress and rate: differential transformations of articulation. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[18]  A. T. Welford,et al.  The fundamentals of skill , 1968 .

[19]  M. Kinsbourne The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention. , 1970, Acta psychologica.

[20]  J. Kelso,et al.  Toward a Physical (Synergetic) Theory of Biological Coordination , 1987 .

[21]  C. B. Walter,et al.  The coordination of limb movements with different kinematic patterns , 1988, Brain and Cognition.