Solution representations and pedagogical representations in Chinese and U.S. classrooms

This study involved an investigation of the relationship between the kinds of solution representations Chinese and U.S. students use and the sorts of pedagogical representations Chinese and U.S. teachers use during instruction. The findings suggest that the representations teachers use influence the representations their students use and, hence, have an impact upon the students’ problem solving. One of the practical implications of the findings is that if students are given the opportunity to construct their own representations of mathematical concepts, rules, and relationships, they also should be encouraged to develop the ability to use symbolic representations, rather than to rely on concrete ones. In addition, the finding that the Chinese teachers in this study overwhelmingly used symbolic representations for the solutions of instructional tasks, whereas the U.S. teachers relied almost exclusively on verbal explanations and pictorial representations, indicates that pedagogical practice is constrained by social and cultural factors.

[1]  D. Schifter,et al.  A research companion to Principles and standards for school mathematics , 2003 .

[2]  Jinfa Cai,et al.  A cognitive analysis of U.S. and Chinese students' mathematical performance on tasks involving computation, simple problem solving, and complex problem solving , 1995 .

[3]  Ralph T. Putnam Alternative Perspectives on Knowing Mathematics in Elementary Schools. Elementary Subjects Center Series No. 11. , 1989 .

[4]  Arthur J. Baroody,et al.  How and When Should Place-Value Concepts and Skills Be Taught? , 1990 .

[5]  Jinfa Cai Why do U.S. and Chinese students think differently in mathematical problem solving? Impact of early algebra learning and teachers' beliefs , 2004 .

[6]  H W Stevenson,et al.  Mathematics achievement of children in China and the United States. , 1990, Child development.

[7]  E. Silver,et al.  Assessment in the Context of Mathematics Instruction Reform: The Design of Assessment in the QUASAR Project. , 1993 .

[8]  J. Hiebert,et al.  Instructional Tasks, Classroom Discourse, and Students’ Learning in Second-Grade Arithmetic , 1993 .

[9]  Jinfa Cai Assessing and understanding U.S. and Chinese students' mathematical thinking , 2002 .

[10]  David N. Perkins,et al.  A new look in representations for mathematics and science learning , 1994 .

[11]  L. Cronbach Essentials of psychological testing , 1960 .

[12]  Lyn D. English,et al.  Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education , 2002 .

[13]  Jinfa Cai,et al.  Generalized and generative thinking in US and Chinese students’ mathematical problem solving and problem posing , 2002 .

[14]  Jinfa Cai,et al.  Parental Roles in Students' Learning of Mathematics: An Exploratory Study. , 1999 .

[15]  Richard Lesh,et al.  From Problem Solving to Modeling: The Evolution of Thinking About Research on Complex Mathematical Activity , 2003 .

[16]  J. Stigler,et al.  The Teaching Gap: Best Ideas from the World's Teachers for Improving Education in the Classroom , 1999 .

[17]  S. Lane The Conceptual Framework for the Development of a Mathematics Performance Assessment Instrument. , 2005 .

[18]  Jinfa Cai Mathematical Thinking Involved in U.S. and Chinese Students' Solving of Process-Constrained and Process-Open Problems , 2000 .

[19]  R. Mayer Educational Psychology: A Cognitive Approach , 1987 .

[20]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  The Nature of Mathematical Thinking , 1996 .

[21]  Gabriele Kaiser,et al.  International Comparisons in Mathematics Education , 1999 .

[22]  Richard Lesh,et al.  Beyond Constructivism: Models and Modeling Perspectives on Mathematics Problem Solving, Learning, and Teaching , 2003 .

[23]  E. Silver,et al.  Generating multiple solutions for a problem: A comparison of the responses of U.S. and Japanese students , 1995 .

[24]  M. Bennett Developmental psychology : achievements and prospects , 1999 .

[25]  H. Gardner,et al.  An Exchange: The Unschooled Mind: How Children Think and How Schools Should Teach. , 1992 .

[26]  A. Schoenfeld Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education , 1987 .

[27]  Robbie Case,et al.  Intellectual development : birth to adulthood , 1985 .

[28]  M. Macdonald-Ross Behavioural objectives — A critical review , 1973 .

[29]  D. Geary,et al.  Development of arithmetical competencies in Chinese and American children: influence of age, language, and schooling. , 1996, Child development.