Directed evolution of novel protein functions.

Directed evolution has been successfully used to engineer proteins for basic and applied biological research. However, engineering of novel protein functions by directed evolution remains an overwhelming challenge. This challenge may come from the fact that multiple simultaneously or synergistic mutations are required for the creation of a novel protein function. Here we review the key developments in engineering of novel protein functions by using either directed evolution or a combined directed evolution and rational or computational design approach. Specific attention will be paid to a molecular evolution model for generation of novel proteins. The engineered novel proteins should not only broaden the range of applications of proteins but also provide new insights into protein structure-function relationship and protein evolution.

[1]  P G Schultz,et al.  Expanding the Genetic Code of Escherichia coli , 2001, Science.

[2]  Sung-Hun Nam,et al.  Design and Evolution of New Catalytic Activity with an Existing Protein Scaffold , 2006, Science.

[3]  D. Herschlag,et al.  Catalytic promiscuity and the evolution of new enzymatic activities. , 1999, Chemistry & biology.

[4]  J. Szostak,et al.  Directed evolution of ATP binding proteins from a zinc finger domain by using mRNA display. , 2006, Chemistry & biology.

[5]  L. H. Bradley,et al.  De novo proteins from designed combinatorial libraries , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[6]  M. Walsh,et al.  A novel ADP- and zinc-binding fold from function-directed in vitro evolution , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[7]  W. Metcalf,et al.  A new activity for an old enzyme: Escherichia coli bacterial alkaline phosphatase is a phosphite-dependent hydrogenase. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Zhilei Chen,et al.  Rapid creation of a novel protein function by in vitro coevolution. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  David R. Liu,et al.  Directed evolution of ligand dependence: small-molecule-activated protein splicing. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Kaspars Tars,et al.  Alternative mutations of a positively selected residue elicit gain or loss of functionalities in enzyme evolution. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Huimin Zhao,et al.  Directed evolution of specific receptor-ligand pairs for use in the creation of gene switches. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  U. Bornscheuer,et al.  Catalytic promiscuity in biocatalysis: using old enzymes to form new bonds and follow new pathways. , 2004, Angewandte Chemie.

[13]  H. Kagamiyama,et al.  Directed evolution of ampicillin-resistant activity from a functionally unrelated DNA fragment: A laboratory model of molecular evolution. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  C. Schmidt-Dannert.  Directed evolution of single proteins, metabolic pathways, and viruses. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[15]  R. Kazlauskas,et al.  Improving enzyme properties: when are closer mutations better? , 2005, Trends in biotechnology.

[16]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  De novo design of biocatalysts. , 2002, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[17]  J. Seffernick,et al.  Novel enzyme activities and functional plasticity revealed by recombining highly homologous enzymes. , 2001, Chemistry & biology.

[18]  Zhilei Chen,et al.  A highly sensitive selection method for directed evolution of homing endonucleases , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[19]  F. Arnold.  Combinatorial and computational challenges for biocatalyst design , 2001, Nature.

[20]  Loren L Looger,et al.  Computational Design of a Biologically Active Enzyme , 2004, Science.

[21]  Patricia C. Babbitt,et al.  Evolutionary Potential of (β/α)8-Barrels: Functional Promiscuity Produced by Single Substitutions in the Enolase Superfamily† , 2003 .

[22]  Marc Ostermeier,et al.  Directed evolution of protein switches and their application to the creation of ligand-binding proteins. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  The 'evolvability' of promiscuous protein functions , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[24]  Anthony D. Keefe,et al.  Functional proteins from a random-sequence library , 2001, Nature.

[25]  Huimin Zhao,et al.  Directed evolution of enzymes and biosynthetic pathways. , 2006, Current opinion in microbiology.

[26]  Lei Wang,et al.  Expanding the Genetic Code , 2003, Science.

[27]  Jeremy Minshull,et al.  Evolutionary potential of (beta/alpha)8-barrels: functional promiscuity produced by single substitutions in the enolase superfamily. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[28]  A. Marx,et al.  Evolving thermostable reverse transcriptase activity in a DNA polymerase scaffold. , 2006, Angewandte Chemie.

[29]  Anthony J. Wilkinson,et al.  Protein engineering 20 years on , 2002, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[30]  Thomas E. Ferrin,et al.  Designed divergent evolution of enzyme function , 2006, Nature.