Large continuous perspective transformations are necessary and sufficient for accurate perception of metric shape
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] E. Pedhazur. Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research: Explanation and Prediction , 1982 .
[2] Jan J. Koenderink,et al. Solid shape , 1990 .
[3] J T Todd,et al. The perception of 3-dimensional affine structure from minimal apparent motion sequences , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.
[4] J T Todd,et al. The visual perception of smoothly curved surfaces from minimal apparent motion sequences , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.
[5] J J Koenderink,et al. Affine structure from motion. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.
[6] J S Lappin,et al. On the scaling of visual space from motion—in response to Pizlo and Salacfa-Golyska , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.
[7] J. Todd,et al. Systematic distortion of perceived three-dimensional structure from motion and binocular stereopsis. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[8] J T Todd,et al. Distortions of Three-Dimensional Space in the Perceptual Analysis of Motion and Stereo , 1995, Perception.
[9] E Börjesson,et al. The effect of polar projection on the perception of euclidean structure from motion , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.
[10] J F Norman,et al. The visual perception of rigid motion from constant flow fields , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.
[11] G P Bingham,et al. Comparing measures of monocular distance perception: verbal and reaching errors are not correlated. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[12] J. Todd,et al. The perception of surface curvature from optical motion , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.
[13] Christopher C. Pagano,et al. Comparing measures of monocular distance perception: Verbal and reaching errors are not correlated. , 1998 .
[14] E. Brenner,et al. Perceived distance, shape and size , 1999, Vision Research.
[15] R. A. Eagle,et al. The role of perspective information in the recovery of 3D structure-from-motion , 1999, Vision Research.
[16] M. Hogervorst,et al. The role of perspective effects and accelerations in perceived three-dimensional structure-from-motion. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[17] G P Bingham,et al. Distortions in definite distance and shape perception as measured by reaching without and with haptic feedback. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[18] Simon J Watt,et al. Binocular cues are important in controlling the grasp but not the reach in natural prehension movements , 2000, Neuropsychologia.
[19] G P Bingham,et al. Accommodation, occlusion, and disparity matching are used to guide reaching: a comparison of actual versus virtual environments. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[20] Mark F. Bradshaw,et al. Reaching for virtual objects: binocular disparity and the control of prehension , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.
[21] J. Philbeck,et al. Dissociation between location and shape in visual space. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[22] Simon J Watt,et al. The visual control of reaching and grasping: binocular disparity and motion parallax. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[23] Mark F Bradshaw,et al. The role of binocular information in the 'on-line' control of prehension. , 2003, Spatial vision.
[24] Mats Lind,et al. Metric 3D Structure in Visualizations , 2003, Inf. Vis..
[25] James A Crowell,et al. Distortions of distance and shape are not produced by a single continuous transformation of reach space , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.
[26] Geoff P. Bingham,et al. Differences between natural and unnatural prehension are not inevitable if calibration is allowed , 2004 .
[27] Geoff P. Bingham,et al. Reaching with feeling , 2004 .
[28] Eli Brenner,et al. On the relation between object shape and grasping kinematics. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.
[29] Paul B Hibbard,et al. Binocular cues and the control of prehension. , 2004, Spatial vision.
[30] Simon Grant,et al. Advantages of binocular vision for the control of reaching and grasping , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.
[31] Geoffrey P. Bingham,et al. Calibration of Distance and Size Does Not Calibrate Shape Information: Comparison of Dynamic Monocular and Static and Dynamic Binocular Vision , 2005 .
[32] P. B. Hibbard,et al. Disparity-defined objects moving in depth do not elicit three-dimensional shape constancy , 2006, Vision Research.
[33] Geoffrey P Bingham,et al. Calibrating reach distance to visual targets. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[34] Mark Mon-Williams,et al. Natural prehension in trials without haptic feedback but only when calibration is allowed , 2007, Neuropsychologia.
[35] Geoffrey P. Bingham,et al. Calibrating grasp size and reach distance: interactions reveal integral organization of reaching-to-grasp movements , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.
[36] Young-Lim Lee,et al. Poor shape perception is the reason reaches-to-grasp are visually guided online , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.
[37] Geoffrey P. Bingham,et al. Distinct perceptual representations for visually-guided reaches , 2010 .