Epistemic Objects, Artefacts and Organizational Change

One of the key concepts of the neo-institutional studies of organizations has been routine—an established, rule-governed pattern of action. The concept of routine creates difficulties when used for making sense of the emergence of new practices or change in organizations and institutions. There are two reasons for this. First, routine was introduced originally to account for the continuity of organizational life. Second, it is based on theories of action and behaviour that focus exclusively on the pre-reflective and embodied aspects of human practice. This paper seeks an alternative approach by using the concepts of epistemic object and artefact mediation of human activity. It argues that representational artefacts, such as concepts and models, are instrumental in inducing change in human practices. Using the work of occupational health and safety inspectors as an example, it is shown how a practice or set of routines is made into an object of enquiry in order to generate a working hypothesis for an alternative practice. The hypothesis is further objectified by designing a set of informational tools and procedures that carry on the new practice.

[1]  Pierre-André Mangolte,et al.  Articulation and codification of collective know-how in the steel industry: evidence from blast furnace control in France , 2003 .

[2]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Theorizing Change: The Role of Professional Associations in the Transformation of Institutionalized Fields , 2002 .

[3]  Takahiro Fujimoto,et al.  Evolution of Manufacturing Systems and Ex Post Dynamic Capabilities: A Case of Toyota's Final Assembly Operations , 2001 .

[4]  Karin Knorr Cetina,et al.  Transparency regimes and management by content in global organizations. The case of institutional currency trading , 2001, J. Knowl. Manag..

[5]  C. Morrill.  Institutional Change Through Interstitial Emergence : The Growth of Alternative Dispute Resolution in American Law , 1965-1995 * , 2001 .

[6]  N. Crossley.  The Social Body: Habit, Identity and Desire , 2001 .

[7]  J. Ruiz Moreno.  [Organizational learning]. , 2001, Revista de enfermeria.

[8]  Jaakko Virkkunen,et al.  Understanding organizational learning by focusing on “activity systems” , 2000 .

[9]  Jannis Kallinikos,et al.  The Project of Rationalization: A Critique and Reappraisal of Neo-Institutionalism in Organization Studies , 2000 .

[10]  R. Miettinen,et al.  The concept of experiential learning and John Dewey's theory of reflective thought and action , 2000 .

[11]  Elisabeth S. Clemens and,et al.  POLITICS AND INSTITUTIONALISM: Explaining Durability and Change , 1999 .

[12]  Andrew J. Hoffman,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL EVOLUTION AND CHANGE: ENVIRONMENTALISM AND THE US CHEMICAL INDUSTRY , 1999 .

[13]  Meredith Williams,et al.  Wittgenstein, Mind and Meaning: Towards a Social Conception of Mind , 1999 .

[14]  J. McGowan.  Toward a Pragmatist Theory of Action , 1998 .

[15]  Charles M. Camic,et al.  Reconstructing the Theory of Action* , 1998 .

[16]  Mustafa Emirbayer,et al.  What Is Agency?1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.

[17]  K. K. Cetina.  Sociality with Objects , 1997 .

[18]  H. Rheinberger.  Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube , 1997 .

[19]  Sten Jönsson.  Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[20]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[21]  Y Engeström,et al.  Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Objects , contradictions and collaboration in medical cognition : an activity-theoretical perspective , 2003 .

[22]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutional conditions for diffusion , 1993 .

[23]  B. Latour.  10 ''Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts'' , 1992 .

[24]  D. Laplane.  Thought and language. , 1992, Behavioural neurology.

[25]  Alan D. Meyer,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL JOLTS AND INDUSTRY REVOLUTIONS: ORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSES TO DISCONTINUOUS CHANGE , 1990 .

[26]  B. Latour.  Technology is Society Made Durable , 1990 .

[27]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS, AND UNDERSTANDING , 1988 .

[28]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication (Learning in Doing: Social, , 1987 .

[29]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[30]  P. Langley,et al.  Production system models of learning and development , 1987 .

[31]  V. Lektorskiĭ,et al.  Subject, object, cognition , 1984 .

[32]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[33]  Marx W. Wartofsky,et al.  Models: Representation And The Scientific Understanding , 1979 .

[34]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[35]  A. N. Leont’ev,et al.  Activity, consciousness, and personality , 1978 .

[36]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[37]  G. Bateson.  Steps to an Ecology of Mind , 1972 .

[38]  C. Lévi-Strauss.  The Savage Mind , 1967 .

[39]  Raimar Richers.  The theory of economic development , 1961 .

[40]  W. Bean.  Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy , 1961 .

[41]  H. Simon,et al.  Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. , 1959 .

[42]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .