Population Coding with Correlation and an Unfaithful Model

This study investigates a population decoding paradigm in which the maximum likelihood inference is based on an unfaithful decoding model (UMLI). This is usually the case for neural population decoding because the encoding process of the brain is not exactly known or because a simplified decoding model is preferred for saving computational cost. We consider an unfaithful decoding model that neglects the pair-wise correlation between neuronal activities and prove that UMLI is asymptotically efficient when the neuronal correlation is uniform or of limited range. The performance of UMLI is compared with that of the maximum likelihood inference based on the faithful model and that of the center-of-mass decoding method. It turns out that UMLI has advantages of decreasing the computational complexity remarkably and maintaining high-leveldecoding accuracy. Moreover, it can be implemented by a biologically feasible recurrent network (Pouget, Zhang, Deneve, & Latham, 1998). The effect of correlation on the decoding accuracy is also discussed.

[1]  K. O. Johnson,et al.  Sensory discrimination: neural processes preceding discrimination decision. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  J. Ko Sensory discrimination: neural processes preceding discrimination decision. , 1980 .

[3]  K. Takeuchi,et al.  Asymptotic efficiency of statistical estimators : concepts and higher order asymptotic efficiency , 1981 .

[4]  K. Takeuchi,et al.  Asymptotic Efficiency of Statistical Estimators: Concepts and Higher Order Asymptotic Efficiency (Lecture Notes in Statistics, Vol. 7). , 1982 .

[5]  A P Georgopoulos,et al.  On the relations between the direction of two-dimensional arm movements and cell discharge in primate motor cortex , 1982, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[6]  A. P. Georgopoulos,et al.  Neuronal population coding of movement direction. , 1986, Science.

[7]  E. Fetz,et al.  Synaptic Interactions between Cortical Neurons , 1991 .

[8]  TJ Gawne,et al.  How independent are the messages carried by adjacent inferior temporal cortical neurons? , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  H Sompolinsky,et al.  Simple models for reading neuronal population codes. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Charles H. Anderson,et al.  BASIC ELEMENTS OF BIOLOGICAL COMPUTATIONAL SYSTEMS , 1994 .

[11]  Shun-ichi Amari,et al.  Network information criterion-determining the number of hidden units for an artificial neural network model , 1994, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[12]  Michael N. Shadlen,et al.  Noise, neural codes and cortical organization , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[13]  Ehud Zohary,et al.  Correlated neuronal discharge rate and its implications for psychophysical performance , 1994, Nature.

[14]  Herman P. Snippe,et al.  Parameter Extraction from Population Codes: A Critical Assessment , 1996, Neural Computation.

[15]  Nicolas Brunel,et al.  Mutual Information, Fisher Information, and Population Coding , 1998, Neural Computation.

[16]  Peter E. Latham,et al.  Statistically Efficient Estimation Using Population Coding , 1998, Neural Computation.

[17]  A. P. Georgopoulos,et al.  Variability and Correlated Noise in the Discharge of Neurons in Motor and Parietal Areas of the Primate Cortex , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Haim Sompolinsky,et al.  The Effect of Correlations on the Fisher Information of Population Codes , 1998, NIPS.

[19]  Alexandre Pouget,et al.  Probabilistic Interpretation of Population Codes , 1996, Neural Computation.

[20]  Peter Dayan,et al.  The Effect of Correlated Variability on the Accuracy of a Population Code , 1999, Neural Computation.

[21]  Peter E. Latham,et al.  Narrow Versus Wide Tuning Curves: What's Best for a Population Code? , 1999, Neural Computation.

[22]  Si Wu,et al.  Population Decoding Based on an Unfaithful Model , 1999, NIPS.

[23]  A. Pouget,et al.  Reading population codes: a neural implementation of ideal observers , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  Xiaohui Xie Threshold behaviour of the maximum likelihood method in population decoding , 2002, Network.

[25]  Si Wu,et al.  Population Coding and Decoding in a Neural Field: A Computational Study , 2002, Neural Computation.