Collaborative learning in technological project design

The POWERTECH contest in Taiwan was established in an attempt to promote inventiveness and technology to elementary school pupils. The POWERTECH contest is designed as a collaborative learning system for project design. Project design is comprised of technical processes, which include the construction of an artifact and improvement of its functions. Thus, pupils learn scientific and technical knowledge through a collaborative design project. The purpose of the study was to examine how collaborative learning could be facilitated in technological project design, and whether and how pupils working collaboratively were able to share their design ideas. The study was carried out by analyzing the design portfolio compiled by a team of four elementary school pupils who were engaged in a collaborative design project that focused on making a robot rat for the POWERTECH contest. A portfolio analysis was used in this study to help researchers assess the actual collaboration process among the team members. The study indicated that collaborative learning in a contest facilitated the sharing of knowledge and resources among the team members. Furthermore, reflections essential for problem-solving among the team members were often raised during the design process. These reflections were also conducive to the reduction of mistakes during the contest.

[1]  M. Mascolo.  Change processes in development: The concept of coactive scaffolding , 2005 .

[2]  Joel S. Greenstein,et al.  The Use of Groupware for Collaboration in Distributed Student Engineering Design Teams , 2002 .

[3]  Thomas J. Shuell,et al.  Teaching and learning in a classroom context. , 1996 .

[4]  S. Gall,et al.  Children's perceptions of helpers and helper motivation☆ , 1984 .

[5]  Kai Hakkarainen,et al.  Collaboration patterns in computer supported collaborative designing , 2004 .

[6]  M. Wittrock.  Generative Processes of Comprehension , 1989 .

[7]  S. Isaksen,et al.  Creative Problem Solving: The Basic Course , 1985 .

[8]  M. McMullan.  Students' perceptions on the use of portfolios in pre-registration nursing education: a questionnaire survey. , 2006, International journal of nursing studies.

[9]  M. Lipman.  Thinking in Education , 1992 .

[10]  Angela M. O'Donnell,et al.  Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning , 1999 .

[11]  R. Newman,et al.  Children's Reluctance to Seek Help with Schoolwork. , 1990 .

[12]  Howard E. Gruber,et al.  Handbook of Creativity: The Case Study Method and Evolving Systems Approach for Understanding Unique Creative People at Work , 1998 .

[13]  Charles M. Reigeluth,et al.  Instructional-design Theories and Models : A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, Volume II , 1999 .

[14]  Dee Russell,et al.  “Jumping in”: trust and communication in mentoring student teachers , 2000 .

[15]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive technology: Some procedures for facilitating learning and problem solving in mathematics and science. , 1989 .

[16]  Richard De Lisi,et al.  Implications of Piagetian theory for peer learning. , 1999 .

[17]  G. Kelly.  The Psychology of Personal Constructs , 2020 .

[18]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[19]  Barbara Hayes-Roth,et al.  A Cognitive Model of Planning , 1979, Cogn. Sci..

[20]  G. Wells,et al.  Learning for Life in the 21st Century , 2002 .

[21]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[22]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  Can a School Community Learn to Master its Own Future? An Activity‐Theoretical Study of Expansive Learning Among Middle School Teachers , 2008 .

[23]  L. Vygotsky.  Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[24]  Anne-Nelly Perret-Clermont,et al.  On social factors in learning and instruction , 2001 .

[25]  N. Webb,et al.  Promoting effective helping behavior in peer-directed groups , 2003 .

[26]  P Gallagher,et al.  An evaluation of a standards based portfolio. , 2001, Nurse education today.

[27]  Ernest N. Savage,et al.  A Conceptual Framework for Technology Education. , 1990 .

[28]  M. Gilly,et al.  The psychosocial mechanisms of cognitive constructions: Experimental research and teaching perspectives , 1989 .

[29]  J. Tudge,et al.  Implications of Vygotsky's theory for peer learning. , 1999 .

[30]  Susan Bobbitt Nolen,et al.  Effects of a school-based social-emotional competence program: Linking children's goals, attributions, and behavior , 2005 .

[31]  G. Fairbairn,et al.  Reflecting on the use of student portfolios. , 2001, Nurse education today.

[32]  J. Piaget.  The Grasp of Consciousness: Action and Concept in the Young Child , 1976 .

[33]  Thomas Lickona,et al.  Educating for character , 1991 .

[34]  P. Gallagher,et al.  An evaluation of a standards based portfolio (This article was originally published in an incomplete form in: Nurse Education Today (2001) 21(3): 197-200. The Publishers would like to apologize for this error) , 2001 .

[35]  Richard S. Newman,et al.  How Students and Teachers View the Seriousness of Peer Harassment: When Is It Appropriate to Seek Help? , 2005 .

[36]  R. Sternberg.  Handbook of Creativity: Subject Index , 1998 .

[37]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Group processes in the classroom. , 1996 .

[38]  A. Dodd,et al.  Educating for Character: How Our Schools Can Teach Respect and Responsibility. By Thomas Lickona. New York: Bantam Books, 1991 , 1992 .

[39]  Richard K. Ladyshewsky,et al.  Building cooperation in peer coaching relationships: understanding the relationships between reward structure, learner preparedness, coaching skill and learner engagement , 2006 .