Methodology for collision risk assessment of an airspace flow corridor concept

This paper presents a methodology to estimate the collision risk associated with a future air-transportation concept called the flow corridor. This concept is designed to reduce congestion and increase throughput in en-route airspace by creating dedicated flight corridors across the continent. The methodology is a hybrid collision-risk methodology combining Monte Carlo simulation and dynamic event trees. Monte Carlo simulation is used to model the movement of aircraft within the corridor and to identify potential trajectories that might lead to a collision. Dynamic event trees are used to evaluate the effectiveness of subsequent safety layers that protect against collisions. The overall risk assessment captures the unique characteristics of the flow corridor concept, including self-separation within the corridor, lane change maneuvers, speed adjustments, and the automated separation assurance system. A tradeoff between safety and throughput is conducted, and a sensitivity analysis identifies the most critical parameters in the model.

[1]  Luís Campos,et al.  On Safety Metrics related to Aircraft Separation , 2002, Journal of Navigation.

[2]  Arash Yousefi,et al.  Nextgen flow corridors initial design, procedures, and display functionalities , 2010, 29th Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[3]  Banavar Sridhar,et al.  Initial Concepts for Dynamic Airspace Configuration , 2007 .

[4]  S. Ratcliffe,et al.  Analysis of Long-Range Air Traffic Systems: Separation Standards—I , 1966, Journal of Navigation.

[5]  Tim Hall,et al.  A Safety Analysis Process for the Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS) and See-and-Avoid Systems on Remotely Piloted Vehicles , 2004 .

[6]  Banavar Sridhar,et al.  Freeways in the Sky: Exploring Tube Airspace Design Through Mixed Integer Programming , 2008 .

[7]  D. Harrison,et al.  European Studies to Investigate the Feasibility of using 1000 ft Vertical Separation Minima above FL 290. Part II. Precision Radar Data Analysis and Collision Risk Assessment , 1992, Journal of Navigation.

[8]  Henk A. P. Blom,et al.  Air traffic collision risk modelling , 1993, Proceedings of 32nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[9]  Heinz Erzberger,et al.  Algorithm and operational concept for resolving short-range conflicts , 2010 .

[10]  Henk A. P. Blom,et al.  Sequential Monte Carlo simulation of collision risk in free flight air traffic , 2005 .

[11]  R R Amalberti AUTOMATION IN AVIATION: A HUMAN FACTORS PERSPECTIVE. IN: HANDBOOK OF AVIATION HUMAN FACTORS , 1999 .

[12]  David J. Wing,et al.  Autonomous Flight Rules - A Concept for Self-Separation in U.S. Domestic Airspace , 2011 .

[13]  Lance Sherry,et al.  Methodology for collision risk assessment of flow corridor concept , 2013, 2013 Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS).

[14]  A. Yousefi,et al.  Safety analysis tool for automated airspace concepts (SafeATAC) , 2012, 2012 IEEE/AIAA 31st Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC).

[15]  John F. Shortle,et al.  Collision risk-capacity tradeoff analysis of an en-route corridor model , 2014 .

[16]  Inseok Hwang,et al.  Optimization based Tube Network Design for the Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) , 2009 .

[17]  Clay E. Hubbs,et al.  Functional Allocation with Airborne Self-Separation Evaluated in a Piloted Simulation , 2010 .

[18]  Brian T. Baxley,et al.  Safety Performance of Airborne Separation: Preliminary Baseline Testing , 2007 .

[19]  John F. Shortle,et al.  Safety Comparison of Centralized and Distributed Aircraft Separation Assurance Concepts , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[20]  Douglas R. Isaacson,et al.  Conflict Detection and Resolution In the Presence of Prediction Error , 1997 .

[21]  L. M. B. C. Campos,et al.  On the probability of collision for crossing aircraft , 2011 .

[22]  A.D. Mundra,et al.  Self-separation corridors , 2007, 2007 IEEE/AIAA 26th Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[23]  Roger M. Cooke,et al.  Further development of a Causal model for Air Transport Safety (CATS): Building the mathematical heart , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[24]  George L. Donohue,et al.  Simulating Collision Probabilities of Landing Airplanes at Nontowered Airports , 2004, Simul..

[25]  Mark G. Ballin,et al.  Pilot In Command: A Feasibility Assessment of Autonomous Flight Management Operations , 2004 .

[26]  Mark G. Ballin,et al.  Analysis of a Dynamic Multi-Track Airway Concept for Air Traffic Management , 2013 .

[27]  George L. Donohue,et al.  Dynamic airspace super sectors (DASS) as high-density highways in the sky for a new US air traffic management system , 2003, IEEE Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium, 2003.

[28]  Jacco M. Hoekstra,et al.  Designing for safety: the 'free flight' air traffic management concept , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[29]  Joseph Tiran,et al.  Condition-based fault tree analysis (CBFTA): A new method for improved fault tree analysis (FTA), reliability and safety calculations , 2007, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[30]  Xi Wang,et al.  Safety Analysis of the Advanced Airspace Concept using Monte Carlo Simulation , 2010 .

[31]  Noboru TAKEICHI,et al.  FUNDAMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS OF DECENTRALIZED AIR TRAFFIC FLOW CONTROL IN HIGH DENSITY CORRIDOR , 2012 .

[32]  E. Hofer,et al.  Dynamic Event Trees for Probabilistic Safety Analysis , 2002 .

[33]  James K. Kuchar,et al.  A review of conflict detection and resolution modeling methods , 2000, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[34]  Heinz Erzberger,et al.  Automated Conflict Resolution For Air Traffic Control , 2005 .

[35]  L. Sherry,et al.  Safety and sensitivity analysis of the advanced airspace concept for nextgen , 2012, 2012 Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference.

[36]  John Shortle,et al.  Estimation of Potential Conflict Rates as a function of Sector Loading , 2012 .

[37]  Robert Hoffman,et al.  Principles of Airspace Tube Design for Dynamic Airspace Configuration , 2008 .

[38]  Lance Sherry,et al.  Analysis of performance of Q routes for establishing future design criteria , 2010, 2010 Integrated Communications, Navigation, and Surveillance Conference Proceedings.

[39]  Arash Yousefi,et al.  Dynamic allocation and benefit assessment of NextGen flow corridors , 2013 .

[40]  Banavar Sridhar,et al.  Initial Study of Tube Networks for Flexible Airspace Utilization , 2006 .

[41]  Ajit Srividya,et al.  Dynamic fault tree analysis using Monte Carlo simulation in probabilistic safety assessment , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[42]  Min Xue,et al.  Design Analysis of Corridors-in-the-Sky , 2009 .

[43]  Min Xue,et al.  High-Capacity Tube Network Design Using the Hough Transform , 2008 .

[44]  L. Sherry,et al.  High-volume tube-shape sectors (HTS): a network of high capacity ribbons connecting congested city pairs , 2004, The 23rd Digital Avionics Systems Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37576).

[45]  Robert Hemm,et al.  Safety Analysis of the Separation Assurance Function in Today's National Airspace System , 2009 .

[46]  David J. Wing,et al.  Human in the Loop Simulation Measures of Pilot Response Delay in a Self-Separation Concept of Operations , 2010 .