Perceptual Deterrence and the Mediating Effect of Internalized Norms among Inner-City Teenagers

Two limitations of perceptual deterrence research are that it generally uses samples with high stakes in conformity and does not examine interrelations between the threat of legal sanctions, social sanctions, and internalized norms. Although some results suggest that the perceived certainty of legal sanctions deters, little is known about perceptions of inner-city teenagers responsible for a disproportionate amount of recorded crime. This study tested the hypotheses that perceived risk of arrest would not relate to delinquency among a sample of inner-city high school students and that internalized norms mediate the relation between social sanctions and delinquency. Risk of arrest was not related to self-reported delinquency, even at the bivariate level; and multivariate analyses indicated that peers, adult models, and the severity of parents' punishment were the significant predictors of behavior. The results also supported the hypothesis that internalized norms mediate the impact of social sanctions associated with delinquency.

[1]  C. R. Tittle,et al.  Social Class and Criminality , 1977 .

[2]  Harold G. Grasmick,et al.  Conscience, significant others, and rational choice: Extending the deterrence model. , 1990 .

[3]  Ted Chiricos,et al.  Perceived risk and social control: Do sanctions really deter? , 1983 .

[4]  Alex R. Piquero,et al.  Reconceptualizing Deterrence: An Empirical Test of Personal and Vicarious Experiences , 1995 .

[5]  Charles R. Tittle,et al.  Socioeconomic Status and Perceptions of Personal Arrest Probabilities , 1982 .

[6]  J. Braithwaite.  Crime, shame and reintegration: Contents , 1989 .

[7]  Ted Chiricos,et al.  Perceived Risk and Deterrence: Methodological Artifacts in Perceptual Deterrence Research , 1982 .

[8]  Lawrence W. Sherman,et al.  Defiance, Deterrence, and Irrelevance: A Theory of the Criminal Sanction , 1993 .

[9]  Richard J. Lundman.  One-Wave Perceptual Deterrence Research: Some Grounds for the Renewed Examination of Cross-Sectional Methods , 1986 .

[10]  Harold G. Grasmick,et al.  Racial Differences in Perceived Sanction Threat: Static and Dynamic Hypotheses , 1994 .

[11]  Mark Warr,et al.  AGE, PEERS, AND DELINQUENCY* , 1993 .

[12]  Craig V. D. Thornton,et al.  Crime, Deterrence, and Rational Choice , 1986 .

[13]  R. Meier,et al.  SPECIFYING THE SES/DELINQUENCY RELATIONSHIP , 1990 .

[14]  Mark Warr,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF DELINQUENT PEERS: WHAT THEY THINK OR WHAT THEY DO?* , 1991 .

[15]  R. Kraut.  Deterrent and Definitional Influences on Shoplifting , 1976 .

[16]  Raymond Paternost ' Er.  DECISIONS TO PARTICIPATE IN AND DESIST FROM FOUR TYPES OF COMMON DELINQUENCY: DETERRENCE AND THE RATIONAL CHOICE PERSPECTIVE , 1989 .

[17]  S. J. Jang,et al.  DELINQUENT PEERS, BELIEFS, AND DELINQUENT BEHAVIOR: A LONGITUDINAL TEST OF INTERACTIONAL THEORY* , 1994 .

[18]  Harold G. Grasmick,et al.  Social Class and Social Control: An Application of Deterrence Theory , 1983 .

[19]  D. Ward,et al.  A NOTE ON PERCEPTUAL DETERRENCE, RELIGIOUSLY BASED MORAL CONDEMNATION, AND SOCIAL CONTROL* , 1993 .

[20]  Scott H. Decker,et al.  Perceptual deterrence among active residential burglars: A research note. , 1993 .

[21]  Ronald L. Akers,et al.  Social Learning Theory and Adolescent Cigarette Smoking: A Longitudinal Study , 1985 .

[22]  Walter B. Miller,et al.  Lower Class Culture As a Generating Milieu of Gang Delinquency , 1991 .

[23]  L. Lanza-Kaduce,et al.  Community Context and Theories of Deviant Behavior: An Examination of Social Learning and Social Bonding Theories , 1984 .

[24]  R. Paternoster,et al.  The deterrent effect of the perceived certainty and severity of punishment: A review of the evidence and issues , 1987 .

[25]  Robert F. Meier,et al.  Deterrence as Social Control: The Legal and Extralegal Production of Conformity , 1977 .

[26]  R. Paternoster.  The Use of Composite Scales in Perceptual Deterrence Research: A Cautionary Note , 1986 .

[27]  D. Bishop,et al.  Legal and Extralegal Barriers to Delinquency , 1984 .

[28]  Jae-On Kim,et al.  Multivariate Analysis of Ordinal Variables , 1975, American Journal of Sociology.

[29]  K. Williams,et al.  Perceptual research on general deterrence: A critical review. , 1986 .

[30]  Mark Warr,et al.  A Reconceptualization of General and Specific Deterrence , 1993 .

[31]  Ted Chiricos,et al.  Estimating Perceptual Stability and Deterrent Effects: The Role of Perceived Legal Punishment in the Inhibition of Criminal Involvement , 1983 .

[32]  R. Paternoster,et al.  Absolute and Restrictive Deterrence in a Panel of Youth: Explaining the Onset, Persistence/Desistance, and Frequency of Delinquent Offending , 1989 .

[33]  R. Merton.  Social Structure and Anomie , 1938 .

[34]  Harold G. Grasmick,et al.  Legal punishment, social disapproval and internalization as inhibitors of illegal behavior. , 1980 .

[35]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  R. Paternoster,et al.  The Deterrent Effect of Perceived Severity: A Reexamination , 1986 .

[37]  Jack P. Gibbs,et al.  Perceived Risk of Punishment and Self-Reported Delinquency , 1978 .

[38]  Michael J. Hindelang,et al.  Correlates of Delinquency: The Illusion of Discrepancy between Self-Report and Official Measures. , 1979 .

[39]  Brenda Sims Blackwell,et al.  Changes in the sex patterning of perceived threats of sanctions , 1993 .

[40]  Ted Chiricos,et al.  Formal and Informal Sanctions: A Comparison of Deterrent Effects , 1977 .

[41]  K. Williams,et al.  THE MEANING OF ARREST FOR WIFE ASSAULT , 1989 .

[42]  Marc G. Gertz,et al.  Fear of punishment and the willingness to engage in criminal behavior: A research note , 1995 .

[43]  Robert J. Bursik,et al.  REDUCTION IN DRUNK DRIVING AS A RESPONSE TO INCREASED THREATS OF SHAME, EMBARRASSMENT, AND LEGAL SANCTIONS , 1993 .