A molecular phylogenetic study of the Palmae (Arecaceae) based on atpB, rbcL, and 18S nrDNA sequences.

Notoriously slow rates of molecular evolution and convergent evolution among some morphological characters have limited phylogenetic resolution for the palm family (Arecaceae). This study adds nuclear DNA (18S SSU rRNA) and chloroplast DNA (cpDNA; atpB and rbcL) sequence data for 65 genera of palms and characterizes molecular variation for each molecule. Phylogenetic relationships were estimated with maximum likelihood and maximum parsimony techniques for the new data and for previously published molecular data for 45 palm genera. Maximum parsimony analysis was also used to compare molecular and morphological data for 33 palm genera. Incongruence among datasets was detected between cpDNA and 18S data and between molecular and morphological data. Most conflict between nuclear and cpDNA data was associated with the genus Nypa. Several taxa showed relatively long branches with 18S data, but phylogenetic resolution of these taxa was essentially the same for 18S and cpDNA data. Base composition bias for 18S that contributed to erroneous phylogenetic resolution in other taxa did not seem to be present in Palmae. Morphological data were incongruent with all molecular data due to apparent morphological homoplasy for Caryoteae, Ceroxyloideae, Iriarteae, and Thrinacinae. Both cpDNA and nuclear 18S data firmly resolved Caryoteae with Borasseae of Coryphoideae, suggesting that at least some morphological characters used to place Caryoteae in Arecoideae are homoplastic. In this study, increased character sampling seems to be more important than increased taxon sampling; a comparison of the full (65-taxon) and reduced (45- and 33-taxon) datasets suggests little difference in core topology but considerably more nodal support with the increased character sample sizes. These results indicate a general trend toward a stable estimate of phylogenetic relationships for the Palmae. Although the 33-taxon topologies are even better resolved, they lack several critical taxa and are affected by incongruence between molecular and morphological data. As such, a comparison of results from the 45- and 33-taxon trees offers the best available reference for phylogenetic inference on palms.

[1]  J. Huelsenbeck,et al.  SUCCESS OF PHYLOGENETIC METHODS IN THE FOUR-TAXON CASE , 1993 .

[2]  B. Bremer,et al.  More characters or more taxa for a robust phylogeny--case study from the coffee family (Rubiaceae). , 1999, Systematic biology.

[3]  B. Payseur,et al.  Failure of the ILD to determine data combinability for slow loris phylogeny. , 2001, Systematic biology.

[4]  Ziheng Yang.  Estimating the pattern of nucleotide substitution , 1994, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[5]  Ziheng Yang,et al.  PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood , 1997, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[6]  H. E. Moore,et al.  Genera Palmarum: A Classification of Palms Based on the Work of Harold E. Moore, Jr. , 1987 .

[7]  Wayne P. Maddison,et al.  Outgroup Analysis and Parsimony , 1984 .

[8]  M. Chase,et al.  Coding and noncoding plastid DNA in palm systematics. , 2001, American journal of botany.

[9]  M. Donoghue,et al.  The Suitability of Molecular and Morphological Evidence in Reconstructing Plant Phylogeny , 1992 .

[10]  M Steel,et al.  Invariable sites models and their use in phylogeny reconstruction. , 2000, Systematic biology.

[11]  Michael D. Hendy,et al.  A Framework for the Quantitative Study of Evolutionary Trees , 1989 .

[12]  W. Baker,et al.  Pollen aperture morphology in Arecaceae: Application within phylogenetic analyses, and a summary of record of palm-like pollen the fossil , 2001 .

[13]  C. W. Kilpatrick,et al.  Phylogeography and molecular systematics of the Peromyscus aztecus species group (Rodentia: Muridae) inferred using parsimony and likelihood. , 1997, Systematic biology.

[14]  M. Donoghue,et al.  PATTERNS OF VARIATION IN LEVELS OF HOMOPLASY , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[15]  J. Huelsenbeck.  Performance of Phylogenetic Methods in Simulation , 1995 .

[16]  S. Poe.  Sensitivity of phylogeny estimation to taxonomic sampling. , 1998, Systematic biology.

[17]  C. Bult,et al.  TESTING SIGNIFICANCE OF INCONGRUENCE , 1994 .

[18]  K. Asada,et al.  Rapid and reliable protocol for direct sequencing of material amplified by the polymerase chain reaction. , 1990, BioTechniques.

[19]  T. Hedderson,et al.  Phylogeny, Character Evolution, and a New Classification of the Calamoid Palms , 2000 .

[20]  A. Graybeal,et al.  Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problem? , 1998, Systematic biology.

[21]  Simon Whelan,et al.  Distributions of statistics used for the comparison of models of sequence evolution in phylogenetics , 1999 .

[22]  A. Liston,et al.  Molecular Systematics and Biogeography of the Southeast Asian Genus Caryota (Palmae) , 1999 .

[23]  J. Felsenstein.  CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: AN APPROACH USING THE BOOTSTRAP , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[24]  Hidetoshi Shimodaira,et al.  Multiple Comparisons of Log-Likelihoods with Applications to Phylogenetic Inference , 1999, Molecular Biology and Evolution.

[25]  J. Palmer,et al.  Monophyly of the Asteridae and Identification of Their Major Lineages Inferred From DNA Sequences of rbcL , 1992 .

[26]  H. E. Moore,et al.  The major groups of palms and their distribution. , 1973 .

[27]  D. Swofford,et al.  Evolution of the Mitochondrial Cytochrome Oxidase II Gene in Collembola , 1997, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[28]  M T Clegg,et al.  Substitution rate comparisons between grasses and palms: synonymous rate differences at the nuclear gene Adh parallel rate differences at the plastid gene rbcL. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  B. Hall,et al.  Long-branch attraction and the rDNA model of early eukaryotic evolution. , 1999, Molecular biology and evolution.

[30]  Junhyong Kim,et al.  Separate Versus Combined Analysis of Phylogenetic Evidence , 1995 .

[31]  J. Felsenstein.  Cases in which Parsimony or Compatibility Methods will be Positively Misleading , 1978 .

[32]  T. Jukes.  CHAPTER 24 – Evolution of Protein Molecules , 1969 .

[33]  A. Eyre-Walker,et al.  Correlated rates of synonymous site evolution across plant genomes. , 1997, Molecular biology and evolution.

[34]  Junhyong Kim,et al.  GENERAL INCONSISTENCY CONDITIONS FOR MAXIMUM PARSIMONY: EFFECTS OF BRANCH LENGTHS AND INCREASING NUMBERS OF TAXA , 1996 .

[35]  J. Dransfield,et al.  The coryphoid palms: patterns of variation and evolution. , 1990 .

[36]  J. Bull,et al.  Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis , 1993 .

[37]  Michael J. Sanderson,et al.  Objections to Bootstrapping Phylogenies: A Critique , 1995 .

[38]  W. Brown,et al.  Amphioxus mitochondrial DNA, chordate phylogeny, and the limits of inference based on comparisons of sequences. , 1998, Systematic biology.

[39]  W. Kress,et al.  Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences , 2000 .

[40]  David L. Swofford,et al.  Are Guinea Pigs Rodents? The Importance of Adequate Models in Molecular Phylogenetics , 1997, Journal of Mammalian Evolution.

[41]  A. Kluge.  A Concern for Evidence and a Phylogenetic Hypothesis of Relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes) , 1989 .

[42]  D. Hillis,et al.  Ribosomal DNA: Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetic Inference , 1991, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[43]  Michael T. Clegg,et al.  Relative rates of nucleotide substitution at the rbcl locus of monocotyledonous plants , 1992, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[44]  J. Sullivan,et al.  28S and 18S rDNA sequences support the monophyly of lampreys and hagfishes. , 1998, Molecular biology and evolution.

[45]  K. Halanych.  Lagomorphs misplaced by more characters and fewer taxa. , 1998, Systematic biology.

[46]  D. Swofford.  PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), Version 4.0b10 , 2002 .

[47]  G. Zurawski,et al.  The structure of the gene for the large subunit of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase from spinach chloroplast DNA. , 1981, Nucleic acids research.

[48]  W. Li,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation of the heterogeneity of substitution rate among nucleotide sites. , 1995, Molecular biology and evolution.

[49]  A. Rodrigo,et al.  Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics. , 2000, Systematic biology.

[50]  J. Huelsenbeck.  Is the Felsenstein zone a fly trap? , 1997, Systematic biology.

[51]  J. Doyle,et al.  Phylogenetic utility of the nuclear gene malate synthase in the palm family (Arecaceae). , 2001, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[52]  Nick Goldman,et al.  Statistical tests of models of DNA substitution , 1993, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[53]  J. Bull,et al.  Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[54]  A. Cooper,et al.  Evolutionary explosions and the phylogenetic fuse. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[55]  D. Swofford,et al.  Taxon sampling revisited , 1999, Nature.

[56]  S. B. Hoot,et al.  The Utility of atpB Gene Sequences in Resolving Phylogenetic Relationships: Comparison with rbcL and 18S Ribosomal DNA Sequences in the Lardizabalaceae , 1995 .

[57]  M. A. Wilson,et al.  Chloroplast DNA evolves slowly in the palm family (Arecaceae). , 1990, Molecular biology and evolution.