Learning objects and engagement of students in Australian and New Zealand schools

This paper reports on a completed field study that examined the usability and effectiveness of learning objects designed for Australian and New Zealand primary and secondary schools. It focuses on student engagement by observing the ways students interacted with learning objects and by listening to what they said about them. Questions that guided the field study included the following: Could the students use the learning objects easily? Did they enjoy the experience? Did they engage with the intended learning? These questions are examined with reference to students at different levels of schooling, and examples drawn from the fieldwork illustrate that, while some learning objects achieved their potential as engaging multimedia educational resources, others fell short. The paper provides a detailed examination of two learning objects to reveal what worked and what created barriers or subverted the intended learning. In particular, it explores interest, challenge and importance as elements that contributed to engagement and socially constructed learning.

[1]  M. Herie,et al.  ONLINE TEACHING AND LEARNING , 2016, EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR).

[2]  Hsin-Yih Cindy Shyu,et al.  Using video-based anchored instruction to enhance learning: Taiwan's experience , 2000, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[3]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Getting to grips with "interactivity": helping teachers assess the educational value of CD-ROMs , 1998, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[4]  S. Engel Thought and Language , 1964 .

[5]  R. Clark Media will never influence learning , 1994 .

[6]  James Paul Gee,et al.  What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy , 2007, CIE.

[7]  N. Cowan The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[8]  R. Mayer,et al.  The Role of Interest in Learning From Scientific Text and Illustrations: On the Distinction Between Emotional Interest and Cognitive Interest , 1997 .

[9]  David Buckingham,et al.  Media Education: Literacy, Learning and Contemporary Culture , 2003 .

[10]  Mike Mannion,et al.  Interactive Multimedia and Learning: Realizing the Bene(cid:142) ts , 2001 .

[11]  M. Prensky Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants , 2001 .

[12]  S. Atkins Achieving educational soundness in the digital age , 2003 .

[13]  Clark N Quinn,et al.  Engaging Learning: Designing e-Learning Simulation Games , 2005 .

[14]  Jiajie Zhang,et al.  Representations in Distributed Cognitive Tasks , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[15]  J. Gee Learning by design: Games as learning machines , 2004 .

[16]  Andrew R. Brown,et al.  Elements of Effective e-Learning Design , 2005 .

[17]  B. Rogoff Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context , 1990 .

[18]  Rob Phillips,et al.  Evaluating the use of learning objects in Australian and New Zealand schools , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[19]  Sara Jones,et al.  Animated Diagrams: An Investigation into the Cognitive Effects of Using Animation to Illustrate Dynamic Processes , 2000, Diagrams.

[20]  Diana G. Oblinger,et al.  Educating the Net Generation , 2005 .