An Implementation of Seamless Human-Robot Interaction for Telerobotics

Achieving human-robot cooperation in a telerobotics system is the focus of this paper. The implementation of human-robot systems can be extremely challenging when the robot is not directly controlled by the human. The interaction mode, depending on the task context, can be continuous manual, semi-autonomous or autonomous. To address the Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) issues in such a system, a concept of seamless HRI is introduced. Seamless HRI implies flexibility in human control in interacting with a robot in different situations, and the adaptability of the robot autonomy in response to the human control. The main idea is to design a telerobotics system that allows a shift from manual to autonomous operation, dynamically, via different human-robot roles and relationships. These roles are Master-Slave, Supervisor-Subordinate, Partner-Partner, Teacher-Learner and Full Autonomous mode by the robot. This paper presents the theoretical foundations and the requirements for seamless HRI. An implementation of the concept and an experimental evaluation is presented.

[1]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Telerobotics, Automation, and Human Supervisory Control , 2003 .

[2]  Alessandro Saffiotti,et al.  The uses of fuzzy logic in autonomous robot navigation , 1997, Soft Comput..

[3]  Gerald Seet,et al.  A Testbed for Human-Robot Interactions , 2004 .

[4]  R.C. Arkin.  Reactive control as a substrate for telerobotic systems , 1991, NTC '91 - National Telesystems Conference Proceedings.

[5]  Luís Seabra Lopes,et al.  Semisentient robots: routes to integrated intelligence , 2001 .

[6]  Rodney A. Brooks,et al.  A Robust Layered Control Syste For A Mobile Robot , 2022 .

[7]  Charles E. Thorpe,et al.  Collaborative control: a robot-centric model for vehicle teleoperation , 2001 .

[8]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  Human-robot interaction: development of an evaluation methodology for the bystander role of interaction , 2003, SMC'03 Conference Proceedings. 2003 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Conference Theme - System Security and Assurance (Cat. No.03CH37483).

[9]  Monica N. Nicolescu,et al.  Learning and interacting in human-robot domains , 2001, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[10]  Henry Hexmoor,et al.  Quantifying Relative Autonomy in Multiagent Interaction , 2003 .

[11]  Andrea Lockerd Thomaz,et al.  Tutelage and Collaboration for Humanoid Robots , 2004, Int. J. Humanoid Robotics.

[12]  William G. Cochran,et al.  Experimental Designs, 2nd Edition , 1950 .

[13]  Y. Agostini,et al.  The Vahm Robotized Wheelchair: System Architecture and Human-Machine Interaction , 1998, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[14]  Vladimir J. Lumelsky,et al.  Final report for the DARPA/NSF interdisciplinary study on human-robot interaction , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[15]  Peter A. Hancock,et al.  On The Future Of Hybrid Human-Machine Systems , 1993 .

[16]  Hendrik Van Brussel,et al.  Assessing the user's intent using bayes' rule : application to wheelchair control , 2003 .

[17]  Kai Wei. Ong.  Sharing and trading in a telerobotics system , 2006 .

[18]  Gerald Seet,et al.  Sharing and Trading in a Human-Robot System , 2005 .

[19]  R. Kirk.  Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences , 1970 .

[20]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Human-robot interactions during the robot-assisted urban search and rescue response at the World Trade Center , 2003, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.

[21]  J. A. Wise,et al.  Verification and Validation of Complex Systems: Human Factors Issues , 1993, NATO ASI Series.

[22]  Donald D. Dudenhoeffer,et al.  Mixed-initiative control for remote characterization of hazardous environments , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[23]  Achieving Robot Autonomy , 2002 .