Word Order in German: A Corpus Study ✩

This paper presents a corpus study of the order between subject and object in German main and embedded clauses. Since prior studies have shown that object-subject (OS) sentences are rare in comparison to subject-object (SO) sentences, for both main and embedded clauses two corpora were assembled: One corpus containing both SO and OS sentences, and a second corpus containing only OS sentences. In accordance with prior work, the rate of OS sentences was low, but the construction of a corpus restricted to OS-sentences still allowed a statistical analysis of OS-sentences. For embedded clauses, the main results of the current corpus study are: (i) Accusative objects predominate in SOsentences but dative objects in OS-sentences. (ii) The use of OS order is tied to lexical-semantic properties of verbs and their arguments. OS order occurs mainly when the subject is inanimate and the object animate. The verbs used in OS-sentences are mainly ditransitive verbs in the passive voice and unaccusative verbs. (iii) Weight had no significant e! ect on order. For main clauses with either subject or object in the prefield somewhat di! erent results were found. Following the presentation of the corpus results, we discuss how they fit into current conceptions of word-order variation.

[1]  Hristopher,et al.  Soft Constraints Mirror Hard Constraints : Voice and Person in English and Lummi , 2001 .

[2]  Jürgen Lenerz,et al.  Zur Abfolge nominaler Satzglieder im Deutschen , 1977 .

[3]  O. Behaghel.  Beziehungen zwischen Umfang und Reihenfolge von Satzgliedern. , 1909, Indogermanische Forschungen.

[4]  R. Dietrich.  Wettbewerb — aber wie? Skizze einer Theorie der freien Wortstellung , 1994 .

[5]  Ursula Hoberg.  Die Wortstellung in der geschriebenen deutschen Gegenwartssprache , 1981 .

[6]  Nomi Erteschik-Shir.  What’s What? , 2006 .

[7]  Jürgen Pafel,et al.  Quantifier Scope in German , 2006 .

[8]  J. Hawkins.  Efficiency and complexity in grammars , 2004 .

[9]  Wojciech Skut,et al.  An Annotation Scheme for Free Word Order Languages , 1997, ANLP.

[10]  E. Engdahl,et al.  The linguistic realization of information packaging , 2013 .

[11]  Theo Vennemann,et al.  Das Zusammenwirken von Wortstellungsfaktoren On the Interplay of Factors in the Determination of Word Order , 1993 .

[12]  Karin Harbusch,et al.  The relationship between grammaticality ratings and corpus frequencies: A case study into word order variability in the midfield of German clauses , 2005 .

[13]  U. Engel.  Regeln zur "Satzgliedfolge" : zur Stellung der Elemente im einfachen Verbalsatz , 1972 .

[14]  Keith Allan,et al.  Hierarchies and the choice of left conjuncts (with particular attention to English) , 1987, Journal of Linguistics.

[15]  Hubert Haider,et al.  Deutsche Syntax : generativ : Vorstudien zur Theorie einer projektiven Grammatik , 1993 .

[16]  Gisbert Fanselow,et al.  Features, -Roles, and Free Constituent Order , 2001, Linguistic Inquiry.

[17]  J rgen Lenerz,et al.  Word Order Variation: Competition or Co-Operation? , 2001 .

[18]  Wolfgang Sternefeld,et al.  Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research , 1993 .

[19]  Vieri Samek-Lodovici,et al.  Prosody–Syntax Interaction in the Expression of Focus , 2005 .

[20]  M. Zubizarreta.  Prosody, Focus, and Word Order , 1998 .

[21]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Predicting the dative alternation , 2007 .

[22]  Wemer Frey,et al.  A medial topic position for German , 2004 .

[23]  Frederick J. Newmeyer,et al.  Linguistic Theory In America , 1980 .

[24]  Wojciech Skut,et al.  Studien zur performanzorientierten Linguistik , 1998, Kognitionswissenschaft.

[25]  H. Uszkoreit.  Constraints on order , 1986 .

[26]  Anette Rosenbach,et al.  Animacy Versus Weight as Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English , 2005 .

[27]  Gisbert Fanselow,et al.  Münchhausen-Style Head movement and the analysis of verb-second , 2003 .

[28]  Hubert Haider,et al.  Scrambling: Nontriggered Chain Formation in OV Languages , 2003, Journal of Germanic Linguistics.

[29]  Shipra Dingare,et al.  The Effect of Feature Hierarchies on Frequencies of Passivization in English , 2001 .

[30]  John A. Hawkins,et al.  Syntactic Weight Versus Information Structure in Word Order Variation , 1992 .

[31]  P. Eisenberg,et al.  Grundriß der deutschen Grammatik. , 1986 .

[32]  Craig Lee Thiersch,et al.  Topics in German syntax. , 1978 .

[33]  Marga Reis.  Die Stellung der Verbargumente im Deutschen: Stilübungen zum Grammatik:Pragmatik-Verhältnis , 1987 .

[34]  Markus Steinbach,et al.  On The (Absence Of A) Base Position For Dative Objects In German , 1995 .

[35]  Erich Drach,et al.  Grundgedanken der deutschen Satzlehre , 1963 .

[36]  G. Grewendorf.  Ergativity in German , 1989 .

[37]  Arnim von Stechow,et al.  Bausteine syntaktischen Wissens , 1988 .

[38]  K. A. Jayaseelan.  IP‐internal topic and focus phrases , 2001 .

[39]  G. Müller.  Optimality, markedness, and word order in German , 1999 .

[40]  Kris Heylen.  A quantitative corpus study of German word order variation , 2004 .

[41]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Grammar overrides frequency: evidence from the online processing of flexible word order , 2002, Cognition.

[42]  J. Zwart.  The Minimalist Program , 1998, Journal of Linguistics.

[43]  L Konieczny,et al.  Locality and Parsing Complexity , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[44]  Beth Levin,et al.  Argument Realization , 2005 .

[45]  A. Friederici,et al.  “And yet it moves” or why grammar overrides frequency: a reply to Kempen and Harbusch , 2003, Cognition.

[46]  Karin Harbusch,et al.  A corpus study into word order variation in German subordinate clauses: Animacy affects linearization independently of function assignment , 2003 .

[47]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering , 2015 .

[48]  Sabine Brants,et al.  The TIGER Treebank , 2001 .

[49]  한국언어학회,et al.  생성문법연구 = Studies in generative grammar , 1990 .

[50]  John Robert Ross,et al.  Constraints on variables in syntax , 1967 .

[51]  M. Schlesewsky,et al.  Gradience in grammar : generative perspectives , 2006 .

[52]  John A. Hawkins,et al.  A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency , 1995 .

[53]  Werner Frey,et al.  Syntaktische Bedingungen für die semantische Interpretation : über Bindung, implizite Argumente und Skopus , 1993 .

[54]  Nomi Erteschik-Shir,et al.  Information Structure: The Syntax-Discourse Interface , 2007 .

[55]  Ad Neeleman,et al.  Scrambling and the PF Interface , 1997 .

[56]  Karin Harbusch,et al.  An artificial opposition between grammaticality and frequency: comment on Bornkessel, Schlesewsky, and Friederici (2002) , 2003, Cognition.

[57]  Daniela Kurz.  A Statistical Account on Word Order Variation in German , 2000, COLING 2000.

[58]  Andrea Weber,et al.  Word Order Variation in German Main Clauses. A Corpus Analysis , 2004, COLING 2004.

[59]  Hans Uszkoreit,et al.  Word Order and Constituent Structure in German , 1987, CSLI Lecture Notes.