How Do Secondary Level Biology Teachers Make Sense of Using Mathematics in Design-Based Lessons About a Biological Process?

In the fall of 2011 five secondary level biology teachers in the northeast United States implemented an experimental instructional module that challenged their students with a design problem. This challenge required students to perform both mathematical analysis and the engineering application of biological concepts in order to reach a resolution. Specifically, given the parental genotypes of two gecko parents, students were tasked to: (a) mathematically represent the relative frequency of all possible offspring genotypes; and (b) design a systematic breeding program for the geckos that would consistently produce a rare and highly desired genotype as a result. Presented here is a study of how the participating teachers made sense of the mathematics and engineering design applied to the biological process of inheritance, and their reflections on their own implementations of the instructional module. Emergent themes dealt with the limitations of mathematics in teachers’ own biology education, their lack of experience with either engineering or design, and their efforts to help students address similar circumstances.

[1]  R. Tolman Difficulties in Genetics Problem Solving , 1982 .

[2]  S. Krauss,et al.  Teachers’ Content Knowledge and Pedagogical Content Knowledge , 2013 .

[3]  H. Simon,et al.  Models Of Man : Social And Rational , 1957 .

[4]  David A. Gillam,et al.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2012 .

[5]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory , 2020, Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies.

[6]  Kristin Lesseig,et al.  Conceptualizing the Work of Leading Mathematical Tasks in Professional Development , 2009 .

[7]  R. Elmore Getting to Scale with Good Educational Practice , 1996 .

[8]  Deborah Loewenberg Ball,et al.  Content Knowledge for Teaching , 2008 .

[9]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[10]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Optimizing Treatment and Instruction: Implications of a New Theory of Disuse , 2013 .

[11]  Paul Adams,et al.  Next Generation Science Standards , 2013 .

[12]  J. Krajcik,et al.  Designing Educative Curriculum Materials to Promote Teacher Learning , 2005 .

[13]  Maher Z. Hashweh Teacher pedagogical constructions: a reconfiguration of pedagogical content knowledge , 2005 .

[14]  M. Manen Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy , 1990 .

[15]  Patricia A. S. Ralston,et al.  Partnerships and Experience in Building STEM Pipelines , 2013 .

[16]  Samuel T. Moulton,et al.  Imagining predictions: mental imagery as mental emulation , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  P. Berger,et al.  The Social Construction of Reality , 1966 .

[18]  Michael L. Robinson,et al.  Engineering Literacy in High School Students , 2003 .

[19]  유창조 Naturalistic Inquiry , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[20]  David F. Channell Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation , 1999 .

[21]  Jeffrey J. Kuenzi Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education: Background, Federal Policy, and Legislative Action , 2008 .

[22]  R. D. Allen,et al.  Student Difficulties with Mendelian Genetics Problems , 1987 .

[23]  William M. Smith,et al.  A Study of Thinking , 1956 .

[24]  Pamela Cantrell,et al.  How Do 4th through 12th Grade Science Textbooks Address Applications in Engineering and Technology? , 2002 .

[25]  M. Çakır,et al.  Prospective Biology Teachers' Understanding of Genetics Concepts. , 2001 .

[26]  Johannes Strobel,et al.  Engineering in the K‐12 STEM Standards of the 50 U.S. States: An Analysis of Presence and Extent , 2012 .

[27]  William M. Smith,et al.  A Study of Thinking , 1956 .

[28]  L. Shulman Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 1986 .

[29]  James H. Stewart,et al.  Difficulties Experienced by High School Students when Learning Basic Mendelian Genetics. , 1982 .

[30]  H. Emmett Brown,et al.  Association for the education of teachers in science , 1957 .

[31]  C. Moustakas Phenomenological Research Methods , 1994 .

[32]  M. G. Sherin,et al.  Developing curriculum vision and trust: Changes in teachers' curriculum strategies: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction , 2008 .