Systems, man, and the paradox of structure

The design, creation, and analysis of structure are central to both science and engineering. The paradox of structure is that, whatever its nature, any structure is both enabling and limiting at the same time. Each person manages this paradox differently, as described by the adaption-innovation theory of M. J. Kirton. This paper provides a summary of key points in adaption-innovation theory, as well as some of its applications in engineering research and education, including a new initiative by the author to explore the relationship between the cognitive styles of inventors and the types of inventions they create. The paradox of structure is also discussed here in the context of technical systems, with specific examples to illustrate its impact on the development of new ideas. Finally, the ramifications of this paradox are considered as the boundaries of science and engineering are moved forward in an age of increased vigilance and system security.

[1]  J. Y. S. Luh,et al.  On-Line Computational Scheme for Mechanical Manipulators , 1980 .

[2]  Graham Thompson,et al.  A review of creativity principles applied to engineering design , 1999 .

[3]  John M. Hollerbach,et al.  A Recursive Lagrangian Formulation of Maniputator Dynamics and a Comparative Study of Dynamics Formulation Complexity , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[4]  K. Jablokow,et al.  The Thinking Expedition: A Course In Creativity, Innovation And Change , 2001 .

[5]  Graham Thompson,et al.  Experience of creativity enhancement teaching in industry and university , 2001 .

[6]  Graham Thompson,et al.  Creativity for engineering plant design: an exploratory study , 1994 .

[7]  K. Jablokow.  Invention And Creative Design: Getting From Thought To Thing , 2001 .

[8]  Kathryn Weed Jablokow,et al.  Project Team Dynamics and Cognitive Style , 2002 .

[9]  K. J. Evans,et al.  Adaptors and Innovators: Styles of Creativity and Problem-solving , 1990 .

[10]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Copernican revolution , 2021, Our Celestial Clockwork.

[11]  K. Jablokow,et al.  Thinking About Thinking: Problem Solving Style In The Engineering Classroom , 2000 .

[12]  K. Kreutz,et al.  A Spatial Operator Algebra For Manipulator Modeling And Control , 1988, Other Conferences.

[13]  M. Kirton.  Adaptors and Innovators: A Description and Measure. , 1976 .

[14]  R. G. Clapp,et al.  Stability of Cognitive Style in Adults and Some Implications, a Longitudinal Study of the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory , 1993 .