Formal Requirements of Markov State Models for Paired Associate Learning.

Discrete state learning models that make Markov assumptions are a powerful tool for the analysis and optimization of performance in paired associate tasks. We seek here to derive bounds on the complexity needed by such models in order to account for the critical effects of lag and retention intervals on paired associate learning. More specifically, after establishing that two different Markov chains are needed (one for describing the effects of trials where a paired associate is presented and one for describing the effects of trials where the paired associate is not presented), we determine the minimum number of states required in a Markov model with two chains. It is shown formally that, under certain psychologically plausible assumptions, more than three states are required. A model with two chains and four states is presented and it is shown empirically that it can account for the lag and retention effects in paired associate learning. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

[1]  John G. Kemeny,et al.  Finite Markov Chains. , 1960 .

[2]  A nonmonotonic effect of distribution of trials in retardate learning and memory. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  R. Atkinson,et al.  A comparison of paired-associate learning models having different acquisition and retention axioms , 1964 .

[4]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  Aging and Skilled Performance : Advances in Theory and Applications , 1996 .

[5]  R. Atkinson Optimizing the Learning of a Second-Language Vocabulary. , 1972 .

[6]  Gordon H. Bower,et al.  Application of a model to paired-associate learning , 1961 .

[7]  T. Wickens Models for Behavior: Stochastic Processes in Psychology , 1982 .

[8]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Mathematical Learning Theory and the New "Mental Forestry" , 1973 .

[9]  James G. Greeno,et al.  Paired-associate learning with short-term retention: Mathematical analysis and data regarding identification of parameters ☆ , 1967 .

[10]  Joseph L. Young,et al.  Reinforcement-test intervals in paired-associate learning , 1971 .

[11]  R. G. Crowder Principles of learning and memory , 1977 .

[12]  T. Salthouse,et al.  Initiating the formalization of theories of cognitive aging. , 1988, Psychology and aging.

[13]  A. Glenberg Monotonic and nonmonotonic lag effects in paired-associate and recognition memory paradigms , 1976 .

[14]  David A. Balota,et al.  Age-related differences in the impact of spacing, lag, and retention interval. , 1989 .

[15]  W. Batchelder,et al.  A multinomial modeling analysis of memory deficits in Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia. , 1997, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[16]  W. Karush,et al.  Optimal stimulus presentation strategy for a stimulus sampling model of learning , 1966 .

[17]  Donald L. Fisher,et al.  Optimal static and dynamic training schedules: state models of skill acquisition , 1996 .