Constitutional and somatic rearrangement of chromosome 21 in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

Changes in gene dosage are a major driver of cancer, known to be caused by a finite, but increasingly well annotated, repertoire of mutational mechanisms. This can potentially generate correlated copy-number alterations across hundreds of linked genes, as exemplified by the 2% of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) with recurrent amplification of megabase regions of chromosome 21 (iAMP21). We used genomic, cytogenetic and transcriptional analysis, coupled with novel bioinformatic approaches, to reconstruct the evolution of iAMP21 ALL. Here we show that individuals born with the rare constitutional Robertsonian translocation between chromosomes 15 and 21, rob(15;21)(q10;q10)c, have approximately 2,700-fold increased risk of developing iAMP21 ALL compared to the general population. In such cases, amplification is initiated by a chromothripsis event involving both sister chromatids of the Robertsonian chromosome, a novel mechanism for cancer predisposition. In sporadic iAMP21, breakage-fusion-bridge cycles are typically the initiating event, often followed by chromothripsis. In both sporadic and rob(15;21)c-associated iAMP21, the final stages frequently involve duplications of the entire abnormal chromosome. The end-product is a derivative of chromosome 21 or the rob(15;21)c chromosome with gene dosage optimized for leukaemic potential, showing constrained copy-number levels over multiple linked genes. Thus, dicentric chromosomes may be an important precipitant of chromothripsis, as we show rob(15;21)c to be constitutionally dicentric and breakage-fusion-bridge cycles generate dicentric chromosomes somatically. Furthermore, our data illustrate that several cancer-specific mutational processes, applied sequentially, can coordinate to fashion copy-number profiles over large genomic scales, incrementally refining the fitness benefits of aggregated gene dosage changes.

[1]  S. Richards,et al.  Prognosis of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and intrachromosomal amplification of chromosome 21 (iAMP21). , 2007, Blood.

[2]  T. Deerinck,et al.  Catastrophic Nuclear Envelope Collapse in Cancer Cell Micronuclei , 2013, Cell.

[3]  N. Carter,et al.  Estimation of rearrangement phylogeny for cancer genomes. , 2012, Genome research.

[4]  Mark D. Johnson,et al.  Functional genomic analysis of chromosomal aberrations in a compendium of 8000 cancer genomes , 2013, Genome research.

[5]  S. Richards,et al.  Risk-directed treatment intensification significantly reduces the risk of relapse among children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and intrachromosomal amplification of chromosome 21: a comparison of the MRC ALL97/99 and UKALL2003 trials. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  Andrew Menzies,et al.  The patterns and dynamics of genomic instability in metastatic pancreatic cancer , 2010, Nature.

[7]  David T. W. Jones,et al.  Genome Sequencing of Pediatric Medulloblastoma Links Catastrophic DNA Rearrangements with TP53 Mutations , 2012, Cell.

[8]  J. Hamerton,et al.  A cytogenetic survey of 14,069 newborn infants. I. Incidence of chromosome abnormalities. , 1976, Clinical genetics.

[9]  Derek Y. Chiang,et al.  The landscape of somatic copy-number alteration across human cancers , 2010, Nature.

[10]  J. Korbel,et al.  Criteria for Inference of Chromothripsis in Cancer Genomes , 2013, Cell.

[11]  T. Richmond,et al.  Complex genomic alterations and gene expression in acute lymphoblastic leukemia with intrachromosomal amplification of chromosome 21. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  C. Harrison,et al.  Analysis of a breakpoint cluster reveals insight into the mechanism of intrachromosomal amplification in a lymphoid malignancy. , 2011, Human molecular genetics.

[13]  Antony V. Cox,et al.  Identification of somatically acquired rearrangements in cancer using genome-wide massively parallel paired-end sequencing , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[14]  M. Loh,et al.  Intrachromosomal amplification of chromosome 21 is associated with inferior outcomes in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated in contemporary standard-risk children's oncology group studies: a report from the children's oncology group. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  N. Carter,et al.  Massive Genomic Rearrangement Acquired in a Single Catastrophic Event during Cancer Development , 2011, Cell.

[16]  P. Jacobs,et al.  Estimates of the frequency of chromosome abnormalities detectable in unselected newborns using moderate levels of banding. , 1992, Journal of medical genetics.

[17]  C. Harrison,et al.  Genomic characterization implicates iAMP21 as a likely primary genetic event in childhood B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. , 2011, Blood.

[18]  C. Harrison,et al.  Intrachromosomal amplification of chromosome 21 (iAMP21) may arise from a breakage–fusion–bridge cycle , 2007, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[19]  Neil J Ganem,et al.  DNA breaks and chromosome pulverization from errors in mitosis , 2012, Nature.

[20]  M. Stratton,et al.  The cancer genome , 2009, Nature.

[21]  P. Boyle,et al.  Population mixing, socioeconomic status and incidence of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in England and Wales: analysis by census ward , 2008, British Journal of Cancer.